Re: [GRASS-dev] r34362, r34366
Hi, 2008/11/20 Hamish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] >> But maybe you are right (in terms of g6.x), if you prefer I will revert >> this change. > > for g6.x I prefer that it be reverted so the interactive functionality > is not (effectively) lost. done in r34407. Martin -- Martin Landa * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa * ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] r34362, r34366
Hamish: > > re. https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/34366 > > > > fine for grass7, but please don't disable > valid+working functionality in > > devbr6. if you want to launch a gui window for it use > "r.recode --ui". Martin: > well, I prefer to disable GRASS_UI_TERM in general (where is possible). it's added there, by hand, on purpose & for a reason. without it there is no (obvious) way to get at that part of the module's functionality. sure, the gui menu should use --ui in the menu entry for that module so that a xterm isn't needed and there are not wingrass problems etc. > But maybe you are right (in terms of g6.x), if you prefer I will revert > this change. for g6.x I prefer that it be reverted so the interactive functionality is not (effectively) lost. thanks, Hamish ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] r34362, r34366
Hi, 2008/11/19 Hamish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > re. https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/34366 > > fine for grass7, but please don't disable valid+working functionality in > devbr6. if you want to launch a gui window for it use "r.recode --ui". well, I prefer to disable GRASS_UI_TERM in general (where is possible). But maybe you are right (in terms of g6.x), if you prefer I will revert this change. M. -- Martin Landa * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa * ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
[GRASS-dev] r34362, r34366
Hi, re. area of https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/34362 is it really a good idea for us to be telling people to use "rm -rf" in a main help page?? For one thing it's not portable, and for another new users are reading that- I'd suggest for them to learn to do dangerous things on their own time and we just say nothing. They'll all know how to delete a folder, all we have to say is that they can do that without worrying about breaking some registry. but let them source their own ammo. re. https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/34366 fine for grass7, but please don't disable valid+working functionality in devbr6. if you want to launch a gui window for it use "r.recode --ui". thanks, Hamish ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
