Re: [GRASS-dev] removing nviz from trunk
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Martin Landa wrote: > 2012/11/4 Martin Landa : ... >> thanks for you comments. Since there were no objections I will start >> removal process. > > done in r53748-53755. Also related libraries (form, bwidget, gtcktk) > have been removed. So currently G7 should TCL/TK-free. I recompiled from scratch and it went through fine. Markus ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] removing nviz from trunk
Hi, 2012/11/4 Martin Landa : >> wxNviz [1] covers almost 100% of functionality compared to original >> nviz and it's stable enough for other testing and development. This is >> the main reason why I would vote for removing nviz from trunk >> including related libraries like `form` or `gtcltk`. > > thanks for you comments. Since there were no objections I will start > removal process. done in r53748-53755. Also related libraries (form, bwidget, gtcktk) have been removed. So currently G7 should TCL/TK-free. Martin -- Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] removing nviz from trunk
While I too am in favor of this, it makes it all the more imperative that we solve the broken wxNVIZ for Mac. Michael C. Michael Barton Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change Arizona State University voice: 480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-727-9746 (CSDC) fax: 480-965-7671 (SHESC), 480-727-0709 (CSDC) www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton, http://csdc.asu.edu On Nov 4, 2012, at 11:39 AM, grass-dev-requ...@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:grass-dev-requ...@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: From: Martin Landa mailto:landa.mar...@gmail.com>> Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] removing nviz from trunk Date: November 4, 2012 4:33:59 AM MST To: GRASS developers list mailto:grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org>> Cc: Helena Mitasova mailto:hmit...@ncsu.edu>> Hi all, 2012/10/27 Martin Landa mailto:landa.mar...@gmail.com>>: wxNviz [1] covers almost 100% of functionality compared to original nviz and it's stable enough for other testing and development. This is the main reason why I would vote for removing nviz from trunk including related libraries like `form` or `gtcltk`. thanks for you comments. Since there were no objections I will start removal process. Martin -- ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] removing nviz from trunk
Hi all, 2012/10/27 Martin Landa : > wxNviz [1] covers almost 100% of functionality compared to original > nviz and it's stable enough for other testing and development. This is > the main reason why I would vote for removing nviz from trunk > including related libraries like `form` or `gtcltk`. thanks for you comments. Since there were no objections I will start removal process. Martin -- Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] removing nviz from trunk
One question - Does the region change work properly for wxnviz in grass7? In grass6.4.3 it is necessary to quit entire wxgui to get the region change to apply to wxnviz, but based on the discussions with Anna this can be fixed in grass7? (I just got back from europe so it will take me a day or too to catch up and get some time to test). I agree that tcl/tk nviz can be removed from trunk - I have been using wxnviz exclusively for the research and edu work for couple months now and I did not see a reason to go back to old nviz for anything so far. Helena Helena Mitasova Associate Professor Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences 2800 Faucette Drive, Rm. 1125 Jordan Hall North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC 27695-8208 hmit...@ncsu.edu "All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.” On Oct 27, 2012, at 3:11 AM, Anna Kratochvílová wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Martin Landa wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> nviz is the last Tcl/Tk application in trunk. >> >> wxNviz [1] covers almost 100% of functionality compared to original >> nviz and it's stable enough for other testing and development. This is >> the main reason why I would vote for removing nviz from trunk >> including related libraries like `form` or `gtcltk`. > > Hi, > > here [1] is the comparison of tcltk nviz and wxNviz functionality, > feel free to edit it. > > Anna > > [1] > http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/WxNviz#Comparison_of_Tcl.2FTk_nviz_and_wxNviz_functionality > >> >> Martin >> >> [1] http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/WxNviz >> >> -- >> Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa >> ___ >> grass-dev mailing list >> grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] removing nviz from trunk
+1 On Oct 27, 2012 3:44 AM, "Martin Landa" wrote: > Hi all, > > nviz is the last Tcl/Tk application in trunk. > > wxNviz [1] covers almost 100% of functionality compared to original > nviz and it's stable enough for other testing and development. This is > the main reason why I would vote for removing nviz from trunk > including related libraries like `form` or `gtcltk`. > > Martin > > [1] http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/WxNviz > > -- > Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa > ___ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] removing nviz from trunk
As old NVIZ is set to go anyway, I'd say Yes for removing it from trunk. There is still time till 7.0 release to improve wxnviz to match all features/stability of good old NVIZ. Maris. 2012/10/27 Anna Kratochvílová : > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Martin Landa wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> nviz is the last Tcl/Tk application in trunk. >> >> wxNviz [1] covers almost 100% of functionality compared to original >> nviz and it's stable enough for other testing and development. This is >> the main reason why I would vote for removing nviz from trunk >> including related libraries like `form` or `gtcltk`. > > Hi, > > here [1] is the comparison of tcltk nviz and wxNviz functionality, > feel free to edit it. > > Anna > > [1] > http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/WxNviz#Comparison_of_Tcl.2FTk_nviz_and_wxNviz_functionality > >> >> Martin >> >> [1] http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/WxNviz >> >> -- >> Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa >> ___ >> grass-dev mailing list >> grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > ___ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] removing nviz from trunk
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Martin Landa wrote: > Hi all, > > nviz is the last Tcl/Tk application in trunk. > > wxNviz [1] covers almost 100% of functionality compared to original > nviz and it's stable enough for other testing and development. This is > the main reason why I would vote for removing nviz from trunk > including related libraries like `form` or `gtcltk`. Hi, here [1] is the comparison of tcltk nviz and wxNviz functionality, feel free to edit it. Anna [1] http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/WxNviz#Comparison_of_Tcl.2FTk_nviz_and_wxNviz_functionality > > Martin > > [1] http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/WxNviz > > -- > Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa > ___ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
[GRASS-dev] removing nviz from trunk
Hi all, nviz is the last Tcl/Tk application in trunk. wxNviz [1] covers almost 100% of functionality compared to original nviz and it's stable enough for other testing and development. This is the main reason why I would vote for removing nviz from trunk including related libraries like `form` or `gtcltk`. Martin [1] http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/WxNviz -- Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
