Re: [GRASS-dev] storing full script as metadata

2008-06-09 Thread Hamish
Yann Chemin wrote:
> well, since G_recreate_command passed it into the metadata,
> I guess already that is good.
> I was thinking more of a kind of "command log",
> but with time-based
> separation of commands used in txt files.
> Whether they are stored inside a mapset would just be
> convenient.


see also 'v.info -h ' for some developed  which is the result 
of a number of vector module processing steps.

and the raster-metadata rewrite task suggestion box on the grass wiki grass7 
ideas page.


Hamish



  

___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev


Re: [GRASS-dev] storing full script as metadata

2008-06-09 Thread Yann Chemin
2008/6/9 Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Yann Chemin wrote:
>
>> Just wanted to keep exact track of the processing leading to a new layer.
>>
>> 1 - would it be feasible to store the whole processing line with
>> parameters (i.e. r.something -a input=file_in output-file_out etc...)
>> as metadata in the output file of a module ?
>
> G_command_history() already does this, i.e. it appends the result of
> G_recreate_command() to the history.
>

G_recreate_command()
OK I'll look into it.

>> 2 - would it be interesting to make a scripts/ place inside a mapset
>> where scripts would get automatically saved with something like:
>> MMMDDH_MODULE_NAME.sh or the like?
>
> I'm not sure what you're suggesting here.
>
> GRASS (the libraries and modules) only knows which commands are run;
> it doesn't know *how* they are run, e.g. if they are part a script, if
> they were typed into the shell, executed by the GUI, etc.
>

well, since G_recreate_command passed it into the metadata,
I guess already that is good.
I was thinking more of a kind of "command log", but with time-based
separation of commands used in txt files.
Whether they are stored inside a mapset would just be convenient.

thanks
Yann

> --
> Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>



-- 
Yann Chemin
International Rice Research Institute
Office: http://www.irri.org/gis
Perso: http://www.freewebs.com/ychemin
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev


Re: [GRASS-dev] storing full script as metadata

2008-06-09 Thread Glynn Clements

Yann Chemin wrote:

> Just wanted to keep exact track of the processing leading to a new layer.
> 
> 1 - would it be feasible to store the whole processing line with
> parameters (i.e. r.something -a input=file_in output-file_out etc...)
> as metadata in the output file of a module ?

G_command_history() already does this, i.e. it appends the result of
G_recreate_command() to the history.

> 2 - would it be interesting to make a scripts/ place inside a mapset
> where scripts would get automatically saved with something like:
> MMMDDH_MODULE_NAME.sh or the like?

I'm not sure what you're suggesting here.

GRASS (the libraries and modules) only knows which commands are run;
it doesn't know *how* they are run, e.g. if they are part a script, if
they were typed into the shell, executed by the GUI, etc.

-- 
Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev


[GRASS-dev] storing full script as metadata

2008-06-08 Thread Yann Chemin
Hello,

Just wanted to keep exact track of the processing leading to a new layer.

1 - would it be feasible to store the whole processing line with
parameters (i.e. r.something -a input=file_in output-file_out etc...)
as metadata in the output file of a module ?

2 - would it be interesting to make a scripts/ place inside a mapset
where scripts would get automatically saved with something like:
MMMDDH_MODULE_NAME.sh or the like?

just an idea.
Yann

-- 
Yann Chemin
International Rice Research Institute
Office: http://www.irri.org/gis
Perso: http://www.freewebs.com/ychemin
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev