Re: [GRASS-dev] d.out.file
Anna wrote: I just added the support of exporting image from wxGUI and d.mon through command line. It does not support the advanced options of d.out.file in GRASS 64 (mainly because of different rendering mechanism). Testing (especially in d.mon) is welcome. Hi Anna, one very useful advanced option of the GRASS 6 d.out.file is the output format geotiff, that way you can compose a scene and export it, then reimport it as a georeferenced RGB image. Do we still have a way of doing that? The quadruple size is problematic for making poster sized output since the grid, barscale, vector line overlays are still exported as 1 px wide, which shrinks to 1/4 the size when you try and export as high quality. The cairo and vector-based output drivers may help, but the main solution I have for that is to encourage people to use ps.map for when they want hi-res hardcopy outputs. thanks, Hamish ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] d.out.file
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Hamish hamis...@yahoo.com wrote: Anna wrote: I just added the support of exporting image from wxGUI and d.mon through command line. It does not support the advanced options of d.out.file in GRASS 64 (mainly because of different rendering mechanism). Testing (especially in d.mon) is welcome. Hi Anna, one very useful advanced option of the GRASS 6 d.out.file is the output format geotiff, that way you can compose a scene and export it, then reimport it as a georeferenced RGB image. Do we still have a way of doing that? No, we don't. Or better say, accoring to the fact that d.out.file is being reintroduced, we don't have the way yet. But my question is: wouldn't be d.out.rast/d.to.rast even better than d.out.file to GeoTIFF with subsequent import and r.composite. d.out.rast/d.to.rast would do the mentioned process automatically. Clearly, there is a place for both and I think I would use both; export as GeoTIFF, referenced PNG, or what ever for use in other applications as well as direct (at least from user point of view) conversion to raster map (for 3D view surface cover). Vaclav The quadruple size is problematic for making poster sized output since the grid, barscale, vector line overlays are still exported as 1 px wide, which shrinks to 1/4 the size when you try and export as high quality. The cairo and vector-based output drivers may help, but the main solution I have for that is to encourage people to use ps.map for when they want hi-res hardcopy outputs. thanks, Hamish ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] d.out.file: world (wld) file support issue
On Jan 25, 2008 11:21 PM, Dylan Beaudette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 25 January 2008, Markus Neteler wrote: Hi, I wanted to add world file support to d.out.file but it seems that d.info -g doesn't work correctly (-g just added in SVN) in case that the res= parameter of d.out.file is used. The generated world file remains identical and thus the resulting map shifted. What's wrong here? Patch attached to generate the world file. thanks Markus I am not sure what is wrong, but... would it make sense to use the facillities for world file creation that GDAL provides ? via r.out.gdal ? maybe I am not seeing the subtle differences.. I want to write out the *monitor* content with d.out.file (r.out.gdal cannot do that). Markus ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] d.out.file: world (wld) file support issue
On Friday 25 January 2008, Markus Neteler wrote: Hi, I wanted to add world file support to d.out.file but it seems that d.info -g doesn't work correctly (-g just added in SVN) in case that the res= parameter of d.out.file is used. The generated world file remains identical and thus the resulting map shifted. What's wrong here? Patch attached to generate the world file. thanks Markus I am not sure what is wrong, but... would it make sense to use the facillities for world file creation that GDAL provides ? via r.out.gdal ? maybe I am not seeing the subtle differences.. cheers, -- Dylan Beaudette Soil Resource Laboratory http://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/ University of California at Davis 530.754.7341 ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
