Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #2031: G_legal_filename() cleanup patch for GRASS 6

[Moritz Lennert]

On 19/05/14 05:30, GRASS GIS wrote:


  And again, even if this were a valid candidate for G6, backporting stuff
  directly to 6.4 without going into devbr6 for at least light/any testing
  first, especially anything which touches core libgis, especially a time
  right before RC release, is incredibly risky for anything which is not a
  critical bug fix, and not an environment I can justify contributing my
  time to.


  sorry if I'm grumpy, but I'm at the end of my rope about this.

  regards,
  Hamish


How about my proposal from a few weeks ago: Nobody commits to 
grass64release, only to grass6dev, and Hamish is the official maintainer 
of grass64release and decides what can be backported ?


This obviously can only work if Hamish has the time, so that 6.4.4 is 
not stalled for lack of manpower.


Moritz

___
grass-psc mailing list
grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #2031: G_legal_filename() cleanup patch for GRASS 6

[Martin Landa]

Hi,

2014-05-19 9:50 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert :

[...]

> How about my proposal from a few weeks ago: Nobody commits to
> grass64release, only to grass6dev, and Hamish is the official maintainer of
> grass64release and decides what can be backported ?
>
> This obviously can only work if Hamish has the time, so that 6.4.4 is not
> stalled for lack of manpower.

from my personal experience I would say that than we will probably
never release any new GRASS 6 version. ;-)

Martin

-- 
Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
___
grass-psc mailing list
grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc