Hi,
I don't have any experience with that parameter, but I think if you don't
need permeable structures, you don't need that parameter. I would try to
represent the structures in the elevation, that should work. But keep in
mind that it's a shallow water flow model, so it's not ideal for filling
large and deep depressions. In that case you can also consider Itzi model.
Anna
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 5:16 AM Johannes Radinger <
johannesradin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear GRASS users,
>
> maybe someone of you has already worked with r.sim.water while considering
> dams as impermeable structures that retain water, i.e. create
> impoundments/reservoirs.
>
> I am wondering how to best specify dams within r.sim.water: There is the
> parameter flow_control which is a raster map that indicates the
> permeability of the landscape. The manual mentions here a permeability
> ratio (0-1) and I guess this should be 0 for all cells that represent a dam
> and 1 for all other cells of the computational region?!
> But what about the elevation data then; Do I need to provide an
> elevation raster that includes the dam height or should this be the
> elevation as without dams?
> I'd like to know whether I need to provide a flow_control map or an
> elevation map that includes dams or both? I couldn't find any example of
> r.sim.water that uses the flow_control parameter so far... any
> ideas/experiences from your side?
>
> cheers,
> Johannes
>
> ___
> grass-user mailing list
> grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
___
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
