[GreenYouth] Re: Governor can sanction Minister's prosecution, says Supreme Court 2004

2009-06-09 Thread damodar prasad
*But Rasheed, Is not the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA)- a Bourgieous
enactment to save its crass compardor public leaders. *
*I think by the way you were arguing about the necessity of CPs in
neo-liberal context in previous mails, you should've argued that CP leaders
should be above the bourgiuoes law of PCA... clean and uncontaminated*..

Governors, of course are pawns in the hands of the central governemnt and
the CBI is no great independent instituion. But is it not desirable that
Communist Party leader and the CP institution as such should be above such
posts?

I am afraid that the way CPM has managed Lavalin, since the formation of
this Govt., has in turn helped the reactionary forces.

The stubborn stance of CPM has enabled the bourgeous parties reap the
dividends of its mis-managed strategy.

( I referrred to formation of this Govt bocz when Lavalin issue came up
last time, Com. secy has boldly said that he is ready to face any inquiry.
The boldness was missing later, :-) :-) :-) only to be found in the words of
English Desabhimani, I mean the Hindu editorial.)

CPM has given an impression that something is severely rotten by the way it
handled the issue.

The media syndicate must have done its duty but the stance of CPM as regards
non-compliance to judicial review only complicated the matter.

As an enthusiast of CPM brand politics and observing politics above
factional self-ineterests, *you* should be more worrying about the
moral- voice of CPM at national level.

The red card often held out by the CPM on corrupt practice and tainted
ministers will no longer be available.

The argument of political fight on legal issues is not only avaliable to
CPM. Now this will echoed by anyone.. i mean all the compradors..








On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Abdul Rasheed rasheed...@gmail.com wrote:


 *That does not mean that Governer is impartial. Sure, advocate General
 might have party interests. As one who have the right to criticize the AG,
 we can criticize the Governer too, since both of them are party nominees.
 *
 **
 *But here the Governer acted against the advise of ministry and the advise
 of AG. He may have the discreetional power to take such a dicision. By doing
 this, here he became the part of a political game.*
 **
 **
 *regards *
 *Rasheed *



 On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:02 AM, damodar prasad 
 damodar.pra...@gmail.comwrote:

 Since Advocate General is elected by the people, to think he will take a
 partial decision is against the commonsense.
 But never had I thought a post-modern situation would prevail amidst the
 feudal factional struggle for Leninist Truth.
 What more eveidence needed for a the arrival of political relativism, in
 other words, Most-Modern!!


 On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Abdul Rasheed rasheed...@gmail.comwrote:


 *The Governer is the nominee of the ruling party in centre. To think
 that he will take a completely impartial dicisions will be a stupidity.
 *
 **
 *regards *
 *Rasheed *
   **




 On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:40 PM, sunil kumar ksunilgout...@gmail.comwrote:



 *Governor can sanction Minister's prosecution, says Supreme Court *

 By Our Legal Correspondent

  NEW DELHI, NOV. 5. The Supreme Court today held that the Governor of a
 State could independently accord sanction for prosecution of a Minister in
 prevention of corruption cases without the aid and advice of the Council
 of Ministers.

 A five-judge Constitution Bench, headed by Justice N. Santosh Hegde,
 observed that if on facts and circumstances of a case, the Governor cannot
 act in his own discretion there would be a complete breakdown of the rule 
 of
 law inasmuch as it would then be open for Governments to refuse sanction in
 spite of overwhelming material showing that a *prima facie* case is
 made out.

 The Bench that included Justice S.N. Variava, Justice B.P. Singh,
 Justice H.K. Sema and Justice S.B. Sinha said: If, in cases where [a]
 *prima facie* case is clearly made out, sanction to prosecute high
 functionaries is refused or withheld, democracy itself will be at stake. It
 would then lead to a situation where people in power may break the law with
 impunity safe in the knowledge that they will not be prosecuted as the
 requisite sanction will not be granted.

 The Bench gave this ruling while upholding sanction for prosecution
 accorded by the then Madhya Pradesh Governor against two former Ministers,
 Rajender Kumar Singh and Hisahu Ram Yadav. A case under the Prevention of
 Corruption Act was registered against them in March 1998 on the basis of a
 report from the Lok Ayukta.

 Sanction sought from the Council of Ministers for prosecuting the two
 was rejected. The Council of Ministers held that there was not an iota of
 material available against them for proceeding with the case. The Governor
 then considered the matter and opined that a *prima facie* case was
 made out for granting sanction and gave it under Section 197 of the 
 Criminal
 Procedure Code.

 The two 

[GreenYouth] Re: Governor can sanction Minister's prosecution, says Supreme Court 2004

2009-06-09 Thread damodar prasad
*Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA)- a Bourgieous enactment to save its
crass compardor public leaders*I...
 mean the clause clause in PCA invoked on need for the governor's sanction
for prosecution.

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:31 AM, damodar prasad damodar.pra...@gmail.comwrote:

 *But Rasheed, Is not the . *
 *I think by the way you were arguing about the necessity of CPs in
 neo-liberal context in previous mails, you should've argued that CP leaders
 should be above the bourgiuoes law of PCA... clean and uncontaminated*
 ..

 Governors, of course are pawns in the hands of the central governemnt and
 the CBI is no great independent instituion. But is it not desirable that
 Communist Party leader and the CP institution as such should be above such
 posts?

 I am afraid that the way CPM has managed Lavalin, since the formation of
 this Govt., has in turn helped the reactionary forces.

 The stubborn stance of CPM has enabled the bourgeous parties reap the
 dividends of its mis-managed strategy.

 ( I referrred to formation of this Govt bocz when Lavalin issue came up
 last time, Com. secy has boldly said that he is ready to face any inquiry.
 The boldness was missing later, :-) :-) :-) only to be found in the words
 of English Desabhimani, I mean the Hindu editorial.)

 CPM has given an impression that something is severely rotten by the way it
 handled the issue.

 The media syndicate must have done its duty but the stance of CPM as
 regards non-compliance to judicial review only complicated the matter.

 As an enthusiast of CPM brand politics and observing politics above
 factional self-ineterests, *you* should be more worrying about the
 moral- voice of CPM at national level.

 The red card often held out by the CPM on corrupt practice and tainted
 ministers will no longer be available.

 The argument of political fight on legal issues is not only avaliable to
 CPM. Now this will echoed by anyone.. i mean all the compradors..








 On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Abdul Rasheed rasheed...@gmail.comwrote:


 *That does not mean that Governer is impartial. Sure, advocate General
 might have party interests. As one who have the right to criticize the AG,
 we can criticize the Governer too, since both of them are party nominees.
 *
 **
 *But here the Governer acted against the advise of ministry and the
 advise of AG. He may have the discreetional power to take such a dicision.
 By doing this, here he became the part of a political game.*
 **
 **
 *regards *
 *Rasheed *



 On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:02 AM, damodar prasad 
 damodar.pra...@gmail.comwrote:

 Since Advocate General is elected by the people, to think he will take a
 partial decision is against the commonsense.
 But never had I thought a post-modern situation would prevail amidst the
 feudal factional struggle for Leninist Truth.
 What more eveidence needed for a the arrival of political relativism, in
 other words, Most-Modern!!


 On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Abdul Rasheed rasheed...@gmail.comwrote:


 *The Governer is the nominee of the ruling party in centre. To think
 that he will take a completely impartial dicisions will be a stupidity.
 *
 **
 *regards *
 *Rasheed *
   **




 On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:40 PM, sunil kumar ksunilgout...@gmail.comwrote:



 *Governor can sanction Minister's prosecution, says Supreme Court *

 By Our Legal Correspondent

  NEW DELHI, NOV. 5. The Supreme Court today held that the Governor of
 a State could independently accord sanction for prosecution of a Minister 
 in
 prevention of corruption cases without the aid and advice of the Council
 of Ministers.

 A five-judge Constitution Bench, headed by Justice N. Santosh Hegde,
 observed that if on facts and circumstances of a case, the Governor 
 cannot
 act in his own discretion there would be a complete breakdown of the rule 
 of
 law inasmuch as it would then be open for Governments to refuse sanction 
 in
 spite of overwhelming material showing that a *prima facie* case is
 made out.

 The Bench that included Justice S.N. Variava, Justice B.P. Singh,
 Justice H.K. Sema and Justice S.B. Sinha said: If, in cases where [a]
 *prima facie* case is clearly made out, sanction to prosecute high
 functionaries is refused or withheld, democracy itself will be at stake. 
 It
 would then lead to a situation where people in power may break the law 
 with
 impunity safe in the knowledge that they will not be prosecuted as the
 requisite sanction will not be granted.

 The Bench gave this ruling while upholding sanction for prosecution
 accorded by the then Madhya Pradesh Governor against two former Ministers,
 Rajender Kumar Singh and Hisahu Ram Yadav. A case under the Prevention of
 Corruption Act was registered against them in March 1998 on the basis of a
 report from the Lok Ayukta.

 Sanction sought from the Council of Ministers for prosecuting the two
 was rejected. The Council of Ministers held that there was not an iota of
 material available 

[GreenYouth] Who pays the price of development?

2009-06-09 Thread Gladson Dungdung
Who pays the price of
development?http://www.jharkhandmirror.com/2009/06/who-paid-price-of-development.html
**http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_1JMyBl6hwC8/SiuoBjcPyWI/BIE/SyvipMpkyc8/s1600-h/Kelaghagh+struggle.jpg
*By Gladson Dungdung*
*7 June, 2009*

The ‘Kelaghgh dam’ is the most beautiful dam constructed on Chhinda river in
Simdega district of Jharkhand situated at a distance of 4 km from the
district headquarter. It is the best tourist place in the district with
lovely water dam surrounded by multiple hills which attracts tourists very
much. There is a plateau in the dam where a small and beautiful park exists.
Besides, the district administration provides the facility of motor boating
and a hotel is also constructed where the tourists can avail the lodging and
food facility. But how many of us really know that this beautiful place is
made on the grave of Adivasis (indigenous people)? Their only livelihood
resource that was land had been snatched away from them during the
construction of the Dam. The promises made for providing jobs, adequate
compensation and rehabilitation packages were not fulfilled. The owners of
the lands were left to die in the name of ‘development’.

The Kelaghagh dam was constructed in 1980 under the minor irrigation project
of the irrigation department of the government with the aim of irrigating
land of the Simdega block, where three villages – Bernibera, Bara Barpani
and Bhudhratoli completely submerged in the dam with the affected people of
approximately 3500. These villages were highly populated by Kharia, Munda
and Oraon Adivasis, where they used to practice their interesting tradition
and culture. Interestingly, the project failed to achieve its objective.
Presently, the water reaches to only one village – Meromdega and the water
supply to Tukupani, Jambahar and other areas was stopped since a long time.
Though the irrigation project uprooted the well-off Adivasis of three
villages but only one village is being benefited from the project. Secondly,
the Simdega Notified Area Committee supplies the drinking water to Simdega
town from the dam but the displaced people, those who have been living near
by the Dam get supply water neither for drinking nor for irrigating their a
few pieces of land.

A village called Bernibera situated at a distance of 5 kilometers in the
eastern part of Simdega lost it origin, meaning and identity, which had a
historic origin made of two words – Berni and Bera. The ‘Berni’ is the name
of an herbal plant, which is used as a medicine to cure fever, and the plant
is also used to make a rope. Another word ‘Bera’ is a Kharia (language of
Kharia Adivasis) word meaning a big piece of fertile land. Hence, there were
big pieces of fertile lands and Berni herbal plants were also in plenty
nearby the village therefore the village was named Bernibera. The people of
the village used to yield plenty of wheat, paddy and vegetables. But when
the dam was constructed the big pieces of fertile lands submerged in the dam
and the herbal plants also disappeared from the area.

70 years old Mangaldas Kharia is one of those unfortunate victims of
Bernibera village faced displacement while construction of Kelaghagh Dam.
His family was well-off as his father (Jakarias Kharia) had 20 acres of
fertile land in the village and he was also working as a teacher in a
government primary school. He had also purchased another 10 acres of land in
a village called Lathakhamhan, where he used to teach is a school with a
dream of making a good life for his sons (Mangaldash and Isaac). Since he
had two sons therefore he was willing to settle them in two different places
so that there would be no chances of any conflict between them. But his
dream was washed away by the dam. His land of Bernibera village was
submerged in the dam and he was given merely Rs. 11,000 as compensation.

Finally, the family had no option than settling down in Lathakhamhan
village, where the family had 10 acres of land. The land of Lathakhamhan
village was divided between two brothers (Mangaldas and Isaac), which led to
a huge division in the family. Though Mangaldas Khria survived because he
got the government job as teacher in the place of his father but his younger
brother Isaac suffered the most. Later on Isaac and his wife were brutally
murdered and their four kids left the village and living else where. They
are still not able to settle down. Thus, a well-off family was destroyed by
the development project and Mangaldas Kharia is still fighting for the
compensation for the land. He recalls that how women those who were
protesting against the construction of dam had been kept in the Hazaribagh
Jail for three days in 1980.

The villagers had started protesting against the land acquisition by
shouting a slogan ‘No to Dam’ but the protest was stopped when the police
atrocity was inflicted on the people. In 2007, the displaced people again
started a fight with the government for the jobs and compensation 

[GreenYouth] CCDS- DOCUMENTARY

2009-06-09 Thread jeeva jayadas
Hi friendsGood day!!!

Stop for sometime here

Here is  the documentary, made by me as part of the Infochange Media
Fellowship 2008, finds out how survivors of the tsunami are picking up the
pieces of their lives four years after the 2004 disaster that left over
10,000 dead in India. I traveled with my camera person rajesh nair through
Nagapattinam, the worst-affected district in Tamil Nadu, and coastal Kerala.


http://infochangeindia.org/Media-Fellowship-Rebuilding-Lives.html

looking forward to hear your comments
-- 
Jeeva Jayadas
Programme Producer
Marine BizTV
Cochin
India
Phone: 09447404280(mobile)

www.marinebiztv.com

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Green Youth Movement group.
 To post to this group, send email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[GreenYouth] Re: National Alliance of Anti-nuclear M ovements (NAAM) Launched with “The Kanyakumari Declarati on”

2009-06-09 Thread Sukla Sen
This is an extremely timely move - a highly welcome and significant
development.

Congrats to Dr. Udayakumar and his comrades for the great initiative.

The colonisation part, however, appears to be just a bit of rhetorical
hype.

The steel mills set up in India under Nehru regime soon after Independence
with foreign collaborations in different parts of the country viz. Bhilai,
Bokaro, Durgapur, Rourkela are no colonies of those collaborating foreign
powers, by no stretch.
But that's only a minor slip.

The move must be highly welcomed.

Sukla

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Anivar Aravind anivar.arav...@gmail.comwrote:



 *Press Release*

 For Immediate Release

 June 7, 2009

 * *

 *National Alliance of Anti-nuclear Movements (NAAM) Launched with *

 *“The Kanyakumari Declaration”*



 More than one hundred organizations, peoples’ movements and concerned
 citizens from across the country came together for a National Convention on
 “The Politics of Nuclear Energy and Resistance” on June 4-6, 2009 at
 Kanyakumari.



 They discussed all the different aspects of nuclear power generation and
 weapons production, the various stages of nuclearization from Uranium mining
 till waste management, and the commissions and the omissions of the
 government of India and the Department of Atomic Energy during the
 three-day-long convention.



 Besides the scientific, technological, and socioeconomic dimensions, the
 Convention also considered the political side of the nuclear threat. The
 nucolonization (nuclear+colonization) policy of the Delhi government is
 poised to continue with a Russian outpost in Koodankulam, a French
 settlement in Jaitapur, an American joint in Haripur and many more such
 establishments around the country. India is going to look and feel like the
 colony of several East India Companies. The Citizens of India would become
 the energy slaves of these White and Brown power barons.



 Most importantly, nuclearism is a political ideology that cannot stomach
 any transparency, accountability or popular participation. It snubs dissent,
 denounces opponents and creates a political climate of fear and retribution.
 With the India-US nuclear deal, and the deals with Russia and France and
 likely private participation in nuclear energy generation, the situation is
 going to get out of hand in our country. The combination of profiteering
 companies, secretive state apparatuses and repressive nuclear department
 will be ruthless and this nexus of capitalism, statism and nuclearism does
 not augur well for the country. These forces gaining an upper hand in our
 national polity will mean a death knell for the country’s democracy,
 openness, and prospects for sustainable development.



 In order to mobilize the Indian citizens against this growing
 nucolonization, to resist the nuclearization of the country, and to protect
 our people from nuclear threats and the environment from nuclear waste and
 radiation, an umbrella organization (tentatively named as the National
 Alliance of Anti-nuclear Movements) has been founded with eight committees
 on Documentation, Economic Analysis, Legal, Mass Media, International
 Liaison, Translation, Health, and Direct Action.



 A statement known as “The Kanyakumari Declaration” was also passed by the
 National Convention.



 Contact for More Info: Dr. S. P. Udayakumar, spudayaku...@gmail.com,
 09865683735



 THE  KANYAKUMARI  DECLARATION



 Statement of

 The National Convention on

 “The Politics of Nuclear Energy and Resistance,”

 June 4-6, 2009, Kanyakumari, Tamil Nadu, India



 We, the undersigned organizations, peoples’ movements and concerned
 citizens committed to building a world free from nuclear exploitation,
 nuclear business, nuclear power and nuclear weapons, do hereby declare the
 following:



 1.  In the context of the unprecedented threats facing the world due
 to global warming and the rapid depletion of conventional energy sources,
 the nuclear establishment is most opportunistically pushing nuclear energy
 as a climate-friendly energy source. However, all the activities associated
 with nuclear power generation - the mining and processing of uranium, the
 building of nuclear power stations involving huge amounts of cement and
 steel, the long construction process, the decommissioning of plants and the
 handling of radioactive waste - are highly unsafe and expensive, and cause
 enormous climate-changing pollution. Nuclear energy is not cheap, safe,
 clean or sustainable. It also does not offer a solution to our energy
 problems.



 2.  The government of India is aggressively expanding nuclear power
 generation and enhancing nuclear business with countries such as the United
 States, Russia, France, Kazakhstan and others without any regard for norms
 of democratic decision making. We express outrage over the fact that the
 newly-elected UPA government is conveniently choosing to interpret the
 verdict of the recent elections as a 

[GreenYouth] Re: CCDS- DOCUMENTARY

2009-06-09 Thread Mahtab Alam
Hi,
Thanks ton Jeeva. Will go through it and get back to you.

Regards,
Mahtab
Delhi



2009/6/10 jeeva jayadas devakije...@gmail.com

 Hi friendsGood day!!!

 Stop for sometime here

 Here is  the documentary, made by me as part of the Infochange Media
 Fellowship 2008, finds out how survivors of the tsunami are picking up the
 pieces of their lives four years after the 2004 disaster that left over
 10,000 dead in India. I traveled with my camera person rajesh nair through
 Nagapattinam, the worst-affected district in Tamil Nadu, and coastal Kerala.


 http://infochangeindia.org/Media-Fellowship-Rebuilding-Lives.html

 looking forward to hear your comments
 --
 Jeeva Jayadas
 Programme Producer
 Marine BizTV
 Cochin
 India
 Phone: 09447404280(mobile)

 www.marinebiztv.com

 



-- 
MD. MAHTAB ALAM
mdmahtaba...@gmail.com
Phone:+ 91-9811209345

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Green Youth Movement group.
 To post to this group, send email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[GreenYouth] [advt] TheFishPond.in Updates

2009-06-09 Thread Anivar Aravind

Dear Friends

The Fish Pond , a group Blog with Multiple Fishe(r)s now completes one
week of its launch. Within last one week we achieved 5 posts 15
Comments and 3260+ views .

The Current Posts are

Sex in the Neo-liberal City: On Savita Bhabhi
by Itty Abraham
http://thefishpond.in/2009/06/on-savita-bhabhi/

In The Interstices of Holocaust
by A  S
http://thefishpond.in/2009/06/in-the-interstices-of-holocaust/

Friendships: Ins, Outs and In-betweens
by P K Ratheeshkumar
http://thefishpond.in/2009/06/friendships-ins-outs-and-in-betweens/

Laughing unabated
by Mythri Prasad
http://thefishpond.in/2009/06/laughing-unabated/

Corporate Social Responsibility as a marketing ploy: Tata and rights of people
by Sumesh Mangalassery
http://thefishpond.in/2009/06/tata-csr-and-rights-of-people/


-
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/fish_pond
Follow Feed:  http://feeds.thefishpond.in/thefishpond
Follow Comments : http://feeds.thefishpond.in/fishcomments


To Join Send a mail to v...@thefishpond.in with your creative work

a  s

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Green Youth Movement group.
 To post to this group, send email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---