Re: [gmx-users] energy minimization error

2015-05-16 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 5/16/15 6:27 AM, James Lord wrote:

Dear gmx users,
I am getting this error, Can anyone help me to get around this?
Cheers
James


Program mdrun, VERSION 4.6.3
Source code file: /home/james/gromacs-4.6.3/src/mdlib/domdec.c, line: 6792

Fatal error:
There is no domain decomposition for 8 nodes that is compatible with the
given box and a minimum cell size of 6.93203 nm
Change the number of nodes or mdrun option -rdd
Look in the log file for details on the domain decomposition



Log file opened on Sat May 16 22:15:44 2015
Host: james-E530  pid: 22300  nodeid: 0  nnodes:  1
Gromacs version:VERSION 4.6.3
Precision:  single
Memory model:   64 bit
MPI library:thread_mpi
OpenMP support: enabled
GPU support:disabled
invsqrt routine:gmx_software_invsqrt(x)
CPU acceleration:   AVX_256
FFT library:fftw-3.3.2-sse2
Large file support: enabled
RDTSCP usage:   enabled
Built on:   Wed Oct 30 18:28:46 NZDT 2013
Built by:   james@james-E530 [CMAKE]
Build OS/arch:  Linux 3.11.0-12-generic x86_64
Build CPU vendor:   GenuineIntel
Build CPU brand:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3632QM CPU @ 2.20GHz
Build CPU family:   6   Model: 58   Stepping: 9
Build CPU features: apic avx clfsh cmov cx8 cx16 f16c htt lahf_lm mmx msr
nonstop_tsc pcid pclmuldq pdcm popcnt pse rdrnd rdtscp sse2 sse3 sse4.1
sse4.2 ssse3 tdt x2apic
C compiler: /usr/bin/cc GNU cc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.1-10ubuntu8) 4.8.1
C compiler flags:   -mavx-Wextra -Wno-missing-field-initializers
-Wno-sign-compare -Wall -Wno-unused -Wunused-value -Wno-unused-parameter
-Wno-array-bounds -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wno-strict-overflow
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -fexcess-precision=fast  -O3
-DNDEBUG


  :-)  G  R  O  M  A  C  S  (-:

   Gromacs Runs On Most of All Computer Systems

 :-)  VERSION 4.6.3  (-:

 Contributions from Mark Abraham, Emile Apol, Rossen Apostolov,
Herman J.C. Berendsen, Aldert van Buuren, Pär Bjelkmar,
  Rudi van Drunen, Anton Feenstra, Gerrit Groenhof, Christoph Junghans,
 Peter Kasson, Carsten Kutzner, Per Larsson, Pieter Meulenhoff,
Teemu Murtola, Szilard Pall, Sander Pronk, Roland Schulz,
 Michael Shirts, Alfons Sijbers, Peter Tieleman,

Berk Hess, David van der Spoel, and Erik Lindahl.

Copyright (c) 1991-2000, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
  Copyright (c) 2001-2012,2013, The GROMACS development team at
 Uppsala University  The Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.
 check out http://www.gromacs.org for more information.

  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License
 as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1
  of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

 :-)  mdrun  (-:


 PLEASE READ AND CITE THE FOLLOWING REFERENCE 
B. Hess and C. Kutzner and D. van der Spoel and E. Lindahl
GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable
molecular simulation
J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4 (2008) pp. 435-447
  --- Thank You ---  


 PLEASE READ AND CITE THE FOLLOWING REFERENCE 
D. van der Spoel, E. Lindahl, B. Hess, G. Groenhof, A. E. Mark and H. J. C.
Berendsen
GROMACS: Fast, Flexible and Free
J. Comp. Chem. 26 (2005) pp. 1701-1719
  --- Thank You ---  


 PLEASE READ AND CITE THE FOLLOWING REFERENCE 
E. Lindahl and B. Hess and D. van der Spoel
GROMACS 3.0: A package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis
J. Mol. Mod. 7 (2001) pp. 306-317
  --- Thank You ---  


 PLEASE READ AND CITE THE FOLLOWING REFERENCE 
H. J. C. Berendsen, D. van der Spoel and R. van Drunen
GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation
Comp. Phys. Comm. 91 (1995) pp. 43-56
  --- Thank You ---  

Input Parameters:
integrator   = steep
nsteps   = 5
init-step= 0
cutoff-scheme= Group
ns_type  = Grid
nstlist  = 5
ndelta   = 2
nstcomm  = 100
comm-mode= Linear
nstlog   = 1000
nstxout  = 0
nstvout  = 0
nstfout  = 0
nstcalcenergy= 100
nstenergy= 1000
nstxtcout= 0
init-t   = 0
delta-t  = 0.001
xtcprec  = 1000
fourierspacing   = 0.12
nkx  = 56
nky  = 56
nkz  = 144
pme-order= 4
ewald-rtol   = 1e-05
ewald-geometry   = 0
epsilon-surface  

Re: [gmx-users] warnings in energy minimization

2015-05-16 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 5/16/15 12:14 AM, James Lord wrote:

Hi all,
I am using Justin's minim.mdp to energy minimize my system and I am getting
these warnings,Should I care about them? It is saying that my simulation
may not be stable?

Steepest Descents:
Tolerance (Fmax)   =  1.0e+03
Number of steps=5

WARNING: Listed nonbonded interaction between particles 5312 and 5315
at distance 3f which is larger than the table limit 3f nm.

This is likely either a 1,4 interaction, or a listed interaction inside
a smaller molecule you are decoupling during a free energy calculation.
Since interactions at distances beyond the table cannot be computed,
they are skipped until they are inside the table limit again. You will
only see this message once, even if it occurs for several interactions.

IMPORTANT: This should not happen in a stable simulation, so there is
probably something wrong with your system. Only change the table-extension
distance in the mdp file if you are really sure that is the reason.


http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Blowing_Up

-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] question

2015-05-16 Thread Andrew Bostick
Dear Tsjerk

residue numbers in chain B are as 220-434.
GLU residue is 380.

residue numbers in chain E are as 435-551.
LYS residue is 540.

How to merge these two chains through these two residues?
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] position restraints

2015-05-16 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 5/16/15 8:13 AM, Ming Tang wrote:

Dear all,

I want to minimize my system to relax the solvent with the positions of heavy 
atoms within the protein restrained. I searched the archives and got the idea 
that I need to put something like this in topology:

#ifdef POSRES_WATER
; Position restraint for each water oxygen
[ position_restraints ]
;  i funct   fcxfcyfcz
11   1000   1000   1000
#endif

But I still have no idea how to get the heavy atoms restrained. Could anybody 
tell me how to do this?



pdb2gmx does this automatically for you.  It writes posre.itp, which specifies 
heavy atom restraints.  It's controlled by a similar #ifdef block.



I want to use gromos54a7 ff to simulate my collagen. As Justin suggested, I need to study 
the original paper Definition and testing of the GROMOS force-field versions 54A7 
and 54B7 to write my .mdp file. In the paper it says,
1.  Each system was energy minimised to relax the solvent with the 
positions of the heavy atoms within the protein and RNA restrained.
2.  All solute atom positions were restrained to their positions in the 
initial structure through a harmonic potential energy term with force constant 
of 2.5 9 104 kJ mol-1 nm-2.
Could anybody tell me how to restrain the heavy atoms of protein, and how to 
get the solute atom positions restrained with a harmonic potential energy term 
with a certain constant?


This is what posre.itp does.

Also note that you don't necessarily have to follow that protocol exactly; my 
general advice for proper use of force fields is about proper nonbonded setup. 
Preparation of a system often depends on what the system is and if there are any 
special considerations.  For a simple protein system, it's pretty hard to break 
things.  I don't see much benefit in restraining atoms during minimization, though.


-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] question

2015-05-16 Thread Andrew Bostick
Dear Tsjerk

I used pdb2gmx -f be_near.pdb -ignh -merge

Thanks in advance.
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.