[gmx-users] Fw: minimization for final configuration

2014-09-30 Thread Mahboobeh Eslami
dear Justin thanks for your replyThe plot of the RMSD against time for the 
trajectory generated with g_rms shows a maximum RMSD about 0.195 nm.
I set cut-off value to 0.2 nm for g_clusters command.
Is it a appropriate value?Sincerely.On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 2:17 PM, 
Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
  

 

On 9/30/14 3:36 AM, Mahboobeh Eslami wrote:
 hi GMX users
 i have simulated the protein-ligand complex by gromacs for 20ns.
 The average for the final structure of 18 to 20 nanoseconds has been 
 achieved.is minimization for the final average structure required?Sincerely.


An average structure might be totally unphysical.  Energy minimization of an 
unphysical structure leads you to something that is probably useless.  I'd 
suggest doing clustering if you're interested in the predominant 
conformation(s) 
during a certain time period of the simulation.

-Justin

-- 
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==


   
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Fw: minimization for final configuration

2014-09-30 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 9/30/14 9:58 AM, Mahboobeh Eslami wrote:

dear Justin
thanks for your reply
The plot of the RMSD against time for the trajectory generated with g_rms shows
a maximum RMSD about 0.195 nm.
I set cut-off value to 0.2 nm for g_clusters command.
Is it a appropriate value?


g_rms and g_cluster do different types of RMSD evaluation.  g_rms compares 
against a single reference structure, g_cluster does RMSD between frames to 
decide on clusters, so the output of g_rms is not necessarily an indicator here. 
 You can tell for yourself whether or not the value was suitable by inspecting 
the loads of output that g_cluster provides you, and by visualizing the contents 
of the clusters to ensure that structures that were clustered together are 
reasonably similar.  For a structure that doesn't change much, you'll probably 
get one really big cluster and then a few that are sparsely populated.


-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.