Re: [gmx-users] Problem with g_chi options

2014-08-03 Thread Florian Sittel

Hi!

I've just encountered exactly the same problem.
I have a trajectory from another group and a .pdb-file with the 
reference structure.
From the pdb I generated a tpr file, however g_chi finishes with these 
infos:



'57 residues with dihedrals found
276 dihedrals found
Reading frame  1514000 time 75667.297
j after resetting (nr. active dihedrals) = 170

WARNING: not all dihedrals found in topology (only 170 out of 276)!'


This suggests, that it can only find the backbone dihedrals, but not the 
ones

of the sidechains.

I do not get, what is meant by 'active dihedrals'.

Additionally, if g_chi relies on topological information from a tpr-like 
file,

we should perhaps change this help

'-s   conf.gro  InputStructure file: gro g96 pdb tpr etc.'

(like in g_rama).


Any little hints to this problem are highly welcome.

Cheers,
  Florian



On 07/14/2014 04:33 PM, Anna Stopka wrote:

Hi!

Thanks for your reply Justin!
I have tried using a tpr file instead of a gro file, but that makes no 
difference. I still have the same problem!


Does anybody have another idea?
Thanks in advance!

Anna

On 07/09/2014 07:24 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:


On 7/9/14, 5:51 AM, Anna Stopka wrote:

Hi everybody,

I wrote last week, but nobody answered. So I write again, still 
having the same

problem:

I want do an analysis of my simulation with the tool g_chi.
The problem is, that the optional output options don't work.

I use the following command:

g_chi -s config.gro -f traj.xtc -oh -all

and all I get are the standard output files chi.log and order.xvg.
I am not sure if it has something to do with the following warning I 
get:


WARNING: not all dihedrals found in topology (only 1056 out of 1746)!

Honestly, I don't understand why I get this warning, because all the
input files are fine.

Have you tried using a .tpr file instead of a .gro file as the 
structure passed
to -s?  I don't know how there can be any interpretation of a 
topology, given

the fact that you haven't passed any topological information to g_chi.

-Justin





--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Problem with g_chi options

2014-07-14 Thread Anna Stopka

Hi!

Thanks for your reply Justin!
I have tried using a tpr file instead of a gro file, but that makes no 
difference. I still have the same problem!


Does anybody have another idea?
Thanks in advance!

Anna

On 07/09/2014 07:24 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:


On 7/9/14, 5:51 AM, Anna Stopka wrote:

Hi everybody,

I wrote last week, but nobody answered. So I write again, still having the same
problem:

I want do an analysis of my simulation with the tool g_chi.
The problem is, that the optional output options don't work.

I use the following command:

g_chi -s config.gro -f traj.xtc -oh -all

and all I get are the standard output files chi.log and order.xvg.
I am not sure if it has something to do with the following warning I get:

WARNING: not all dihedrals found in topology (only 1056 out of 1746)!

Honestly, I don't understand why I get this warning, because all the
input files are fine.


Have you tried using a .tpr file instead of a .gro file as the structure passed
to -s?  I don't know how there can be any interpretation of a topology, given
the fact that you haven't passed any topological information to g_chi.

-Justin



--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] Problem with g_chi options

2014-07-09 Thread Anna Stopka

Hi everybody,

I wrote last week, but nobody answered. So I write again, still having the same 
problem:

I want do an analysis of my simulation with the tool g_chi.
The problem is, that the optional output options don't work.

I use the following command:

g_chi -s config.gro -f traj.xtc -oh -all

and all I get are the standard output files chi.log and order.xvg.
I am not sure if it has something to do with the following warning I get:

WARNING: not all dihedrals found in topology (only 1056 out of 1746)!

Honestly, I don't understand why I get this warning, because all the
input files are fine.

Thanks for your help!
Best regards,
Anna


--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Problem with g_chi options

2014-07-09 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 7/9/14, 5:51 AM, Anna Stopka wrote:

Hi everybody,

I wrote last week, but nobody answered. So I write again, still having the same
problem:

I want do an analysis of my simulation with the tool g_chi.
The problem is, that the optional output options don't work.

I use the following command:

g_chi -s config.gro -f traj.xtc -oh -all

and all I get are the standard output files chi.log and order.xvg.
I am not sure if it has something to do with the following warning I get:

WARNING: not all dihedrals found in topology (only 1056 out of 1746)!

Honestly, I don't understand why I get this warning, because all the
input files are fine.



Have you tried using a .tpr file instead of a .gro file as the structure passed 
to -s?  I don't know how there can be any interpretation of a topology, given 
the fact that you haven't passed any topological information to g_chi.


-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] Problem with g_chi options

2014-07-02 Thread Anna Stopka

Hi,

I want do an analysis of my simulation with the tool g_chi.
The problem is, that the optional output options don't work.

I use the following command:

g_chi -s config.gro -f traj.xtc -oh -all

and all I get are the standard output files chi.log and order.xvg.
I am not sure if it has something to do with the following warning I get:

WARNING: not all dihedrals found in topology (only 1056 out of 1746)!

Honestly, I don't understand why I get this warning, because all the 
input files are fine.


Thanks for your help!
Best regards,
Anna
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.