Re: [gmx-users] possible bug in posre

2017-08-30 Thread Sergio Manzetti
That means intercalation is affected directly by this, and the results will 
have no meaningful physical sense. Has anyone succssfully simulated 
intercalation in the DNA by some molecules without a method that disrupts the 
physicochemical energies of the DNA and the intercalator? 


Sergio Manzetti 

[ http://www.fjordforsk.no/logo_hr2.jpg ] 

[ http://www.fjordforsk.no/ | Fjordforsk AS ] [ http://www.fjordforsk.no/ |   ] 
Midtun 
6894 Vangsnes 
Norge 
Org.nr. 911 659 654 
Tlf: +47 57695621 
[ http://www.oekolab.com/ | Økolab  ] | [ http://www.nanofact.no/ | Nanofactory 
 ] | [ http://www.aq-lab.no/ | AQ-Lab  ] | [ http://www.phap.no/ | FAP ] 



From: "Justin Lemkul" <jalem...@vt.edu> 
To: "gmx-users" <gmx-us...@gromacs.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 4:50:55 PM 
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] possible bug in posre 

On 8/30/17 10:39 AM, Sergio Manzetti wrote: 
> Its only the constraints in DPOSRE that I am concerned about. They do keep 
> the antisense and the sense strands together, however, do they keep this 
> together so that also intercalation between the bases is not any longer 
> physically related? 

Constraints and restraints are different; -DPOSRES has nothing to do 
with constraints. 

Position restraints bias the positions of the affected atoms towards 
their reference coordinates. They are absolute in space, so they don't 
"keep strands together" in the literal sense, but they simply 
prevent/disfavor anything from moving. 

-Justin 

-- 
== 

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. 
Assistant Professor 
Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry 

303 Engel Hall 
340 West Campus Dr. 
Blacksburg, VA 24061 

jalem...@vt.edu | (540) 231-3129 
http://www.biochem.vt.edu/people/faculty/JustinLemkul.html 

== 

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list 

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! 

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists 

* For (un)subscribe requests visit 
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. 
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] possible bug in posre

2017-08-30 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 8/30/17 10:39 AM, Sergio Manzetti wrote:

Its only the constraints in DPOSRE that I am concerned about. They do keep the 
antisense and the sense strands together, however, do they keep this together 
so that also intercalation between the bases is not any longer physically 
related?


Constraints and restraints are different; -DPOSRES has nothing to do 
with constraints.


Position restraints bias the positions of the affected atoms towards 
their reference coordinates.  They are absolute in space, so they don't 
"keep strands together" in the literal sense, but they simply 
prevent/disfavor anything from moving.


-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry

303 Engel Hall
340 West Campus Dr.
Blacksburg, VA 24061

jalem...@vt.edu | (540) 231-3129
http://www.biochem.vt.edu/people/faculty/JustinLemkul.html

==

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] possible bug in posre

2017-08-30 Thread Sergio Manzetti
Its only the constraints in DPOSRE that I am concerned about. They do keep the 
antisense and the sense strands together, however, do they keep this together 
so that also intercalation between the bases is not any longer physically 
related? 


Sergio Manzetti 

[ http://www.fjordforsk.no/logo_hr2.jpg ] 

[ http://www.fjordforsk.no/ | Fjordforsk AS ] [ http://www.fjordforsk.no/ |   ] 
Midtun 
6894 Vangsnes 
Norge 
Org.nr. 911 659 654 
Tlf: +47 57695621 
[ http://www.oekolab.com/ | Økolab  ] | [ http://www.nanofact.no/ | Nanofactory 
 ] | [ http://www.aq-lab.no/ | AQ-Lab  ] | [ http://www.phap.no/ | FAP ] 



From: "Justin Lemkul" <jalem...@vt.edu> 
To: "gmx-users" <gmx-us...@gromacs.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 3:43:09 PM 
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] possible bug in posre 

On 8/30/17 9:33 AM, Sergio Manzetti wrote: 
> Weird stuff, because the 1 simulation turned out well, even without POSRE. 
> 
> Can this POSRE be reliable, in terms of intercalation of molecules? In other 
> words, does the energy that is imposed by POSRE really reflect the energy 
> landscape of the bonds simulated in the remaining of the molecules in the 
> box, by lincs? If the dposre is an aiddtional energy to the h-bonds of the 
> DNA, then any intercalation study is really futile! 

You're talking about both constraints and restraints here, and typically 
restraints are applied to non-H atoms and constraints involve bonds to H 
atoms. Restraints are biasing potentials to prevent motion. You'll 
have to explain what you're studying and why you think you need 
restraints (which are typically only used during equilibration). 
Restraints are artificial, so anything that comes out of a restrained 
simulation should be interpreted with care, because you could be 
completely preventing relevant dynamics. Binding of a molecule to a 
restrained target may be completely unphysical. 

-Justin 

-- 
== 

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. 
Assistant Professor 
Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry 

303 Engel Hall 
340 West Campus Dr. 
Blacksburg, VA 24061 

jalem...@vt.edu | (540) 231-3129 
http://www.biochem.vt.edu/people/faculty/JustinLemkul.html 

== 

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list 

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! 

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists 

* For (un)subscribe requests visit 
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. 
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] possible bug in posre

2017-08-30 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 8/30/17 9:33 AM, Sergio Manzetti wrote:

Weird stuff, because the 1 simulation turned out well, even without POSRE.

Can this POSRE be reliable, in terms of intercalation of molecules? In other 
words, does the energy that is imposed by POSRE really reflect the energy 
landscape of the bonds simulated in the remaining of the molecules in the box, 
by lincs? If the dposre is an aiddtional energy to the h-bonds of the DNA, then 
any intercalation study is really futile!


You're talking about both constraints and restraints here, and typically 
restraints are applied to non-H atoms and constraints involve bonds to H 
atoms.  Restraints are biasing potentials to prevent motion.  You'll 
have to explain what you're studying and why you think you need 
restraints (which are typically only used during equilibration).  
Restraints are artificial, so anything that comes out of a restrained 
simulation should be interpreted with care, because you could be 
completely preventing relevant dynamics. Binding of a molecule to a 
restrained target may be completely unphysical.


-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry

303 Engel Hall
340 West Campus Dr.
Blacksburg, VA 24061

jalem...@vt.edu | (540) 231-3129
http://www.biochem.vt.edu/people/faculty/JustinLemkul.html

==

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] possible bug in posre

2017-08-30 Thread Sergio Manzetti
Weird stuff, because the 1 simulation turned out well, even without POSRE. 

Can this POSRE be reliable, in terms of intercalation of molecules? In other 
words, does the energy that is imposed by POSRE really reflect the energy 
landscape of the bonds simulated in the remaining of the molecules in the box, 
by lincs? If the dposre is an aiddtional energy to the h-bonds of the DNA, then 
any intercalation study is really futile! 


Sergio Manzetti 

[ http://www.fjordforsk.no/logo_hr2.jpg ] 

[ http://www.fjordforsk.no/ | Fjordforsk AS ] [ http://www.fjordforsk.no/ |   ] 
Midtun 
6894 Vangsnes 
Norge 
Org.nr. 911 659 654 
Tlf: +47 57695621 
[ http://www.oekolab.com/ | Økolab  ] | [ http://www.nanofact.no/ | Nanofactory 
 ] | [ http://www.aq-lab.no/ | AQ-Lab  ] | [ http://www.phap.no/ | FAP ] 



From: "Justin Lemkul" <jalem...@vt.edu> 
To: "gmx-users" <gmx-us...@gromacs.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 3:35:48 PM 
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] possible bug in posre 

On 8/30/17 9:21 AM, Sergio Manzetti wrote: 
> Hi, I have made 5 copies of a simulation, using the following mdp , with 
> gen-seed = 17529, 17528, 17527, 17526 and 17525. In this simulation, thre is 
> a piece of DNA; with posre etc. In simulation one, after 20 ns, the DNA is 
> bound to some other molecule and everything looks OK. In simulation 2, 3, 4 
> and 5 the DNA strands fly everywhere in the box, outside the box and even 
> double up in longitude direction. All the directories are identical in their 
> files, and the grompp has been used respectively. Does this sound familiar to 
> some, or is it most likely a grompp error? This is the second time I try 
> this. 
> 
> 
> title = DNA in water stabilization 
> cpp = /lib/cpp 
> include = -I../top 
> define = 

The fact that there's no -DPOSRES here suggests you're probably not 
actually using restraints. Therefore, what you're seeing is your DNA 
diffusing across the box and experiencing the normal PBC imaging 
effects. If restraints are on, you'll see a corresponding energy term 
in the .log and .edr files. If it's not there, there are no restraints. 

-Justin 

-- 
== 

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. 
Assistant Professor 
Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry 

303 Engel Hall 
340 West Campus Dr. 
Blacksburg, VA 24061 

jalem...@vt.edu | (540) 231-3129 
http://www.biochem.vt.edu/people/faculty/JustinLemkul.html 

== 

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list 

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! 

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists 

* For (un)subscribe requests visit 
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. 
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] possible bug in posre

2017-08-30 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 8/30/17 9:21 AM, Sergio Manzetti wrote:

Hi, I have made 5 copies of a simulation, using the following mdp , with 
gen-seed = 17529, 17528, 17527, 17526 and 17525. In this simulation, thre is a 
piece of DNA; with posre etc. In simulation one, after 20 ns, the DNA is bound 
to some other molecule and everything looks OK. In simulation 2, 3, 4 and 5 the 
DNA strands fly everywhere in the box, outside the box and even double up in 
longitude direction. All the directories are identical in their files, and the 
grompp has been used respectively. Does this sound familiar to some, or is it 
most likely a grompp error? This is the second time I try this.


title = DNA in water stabilization
cpp = /lib/cpp
include = -I../top
define =


The fact that there's no -DPOSRES here suggests you're probably not 
actually using restraints.  Therefore, what you're seeing is your DNA 
diffusing across the box and experiencing the normal PBC imaging 
effects.  If restraints are on, you'll see a corresponding energy term 
in the .log and .edr files.  If it's not there, there are no restraints.


-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry

303 Engel Hall
340 West Campus Dr.
Blacksburg, VA 24061

jalem...@vt.edu | (540) 231-3129
http://www.biochem.vt.edu/people/faculty/JustinLemkul.html

==

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

[gmx-users] possible bug in posre

2017-08-30 Thread Sergio Manzetti
Hi, I have made 5 copies of a simulation, using the following mdp , with 
gen-seed = 17529, 17528, 17527, 17526 and 17525. In this simulation, thre is a 
piece of DNA; with posre etc. In simulation one, after 20 ns, the DNA is bound 
to some other molecule and everything looks OK. In simulation 2, 3, 4 and 5 the 
DNA strands fly everywhere in the box, outside the box and even double up in 
longitude direction. All the directories are identical in their files, and the 
grompp has been used respectively. Does this sound familiar to some, or is it 
most likely a grompp error? This is the second time I try this. 


title = DNA in water stabilization 
cpp = /lib/cpp 
include = -I../top 
define = 
integrator = md 
dt = 0.002 
nsteps = 1000 
nstxout = 5000 
nstvout = 5000 
nstlog = 5000 
nstenergy = 300 
nstxout-compressed = 300 
compressed-x-grps = PRB SOL NA CL DNA 
energygrps = PRB SOL NA CL DNA 
nstlist = 10 
ns-type = grid 
rlist = 0.8 
coulombtype = PME 
rcoulomb = 0.8 
rvdw = 0.8 
tcoupl = V-Rescale 
tc-grps = System 
tau-t = 0.1 
ref-t = 310 
Pcoupl = No 
tau-p = 1.0 
compressibility = 4.5e-5 
ref-p = 1.0 
gen-vel = yes 
gen-temp = 310 
gen-seed = 17529 
constraints = all-bonds 



Sergio Manzetti 

[ http://www.fjordforsk.no/logo_hr2.jpg ] 

[ http://www.fjordforsk.no/ | Fjordforsk AS ] [ http://www.fjordforsk.no/ |   ] 
Midtun 
6894 Vangsnes 
Norge 
Org.nr. 911 659 654 
Tlf: +47 57695621 
[ http://www.oekolab.com/ | Økolab  ] | [ http://www.nanofact.no/ | Nanofactory 
 ] | [ http://www.aq-lab.no/ | AQ-Lab  ] | [ http://www.phap.no/ | FAP ] 

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.