Re: [GROW] Working Group Call for Adoption draft-lucente-grow-bmp-rel (start 25/Oct/2023 end 08/Nov/2023)

2023-10-26 Thread Thomas.Graf
Dear GROW,

I support the adoption of the document. In particular useful are the events 
exposing paths being dropped due to policy configurations.

Best wishes
Thomas

-Original Message-
From: GROW  On Behalf Of Job Snijders
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2023 12:57 AM
To: grow@ietf.org
Subject: [GROW] Working Group Call for Adoption draft-lucente-grow-bmp-rel 
(start 25/Oct/2023 end 08/Nov/2023)

Dear GROW,

The authors of draft-lucente-grow-bmp-rel asked whether GROW working group 
could consider adoption of the internet-draft.

This message is a request to the group for feedback on whether this 
internet-draft should be adopted.

Title: Logging of routing events in BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP)
Abstract:
  The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) does provision for BGP session event
  logging (Peer Up, Peer Down), state synchronization (Route
  Monitoring), debugging (Route Mirroring) and Statistics messages,
  among the others. This document defines a new Route Event Logging
  (REL) message type for BMP with the aim of covering use-cases with
  affinity to alerting, reporting and on-change analysis.

The Internet-Draft can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lucente-grow-bmp-rel/

Please share with the mailing list if you would like this work to be adopted by 
GROW, are willing to review and/or otherwise contribute to this draft!

WG Adoption call ends November 8th, 2023.

Kind regards,

Job / Chris
GROW co-chairs

___
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow


Re: [GROW] draft-fiebig-grow-bgpopsecupd-00 / Updating BCP194

2023-10-26 Thread Tobias Fiebig
Moin,
> I think extended (RFC4360) communities should also be added here.
Good point. Added a ticket.

> Another point to add in this section is scrubbing communities from a 
> received route if the number of attached communities is excessively
> high (e.g. > 100).
Same; Also in the ticket.

> I would suggest replacing the word "all" with "specific", or to add a
> line explicitly clarifying not to scrub unknown transitive
> attributes.
I see how the text there is unclear. Added a ticket to fix this after
118.


> The global limits seem to offer no real benefit in addition to 
> per-session limits. The referenced paper mentions Per-Origin AS
> limits, not the per-Neighbor AS limits mentioned in the draft. This
> also seems to be unimplementable, given that routers act
> independently on prefixes they receive.

I think there are two points in here:
- The paper mentions per-origin, which i consider even more un-
  implementable than per-neighbor, which is why I restricted it to 
  direct neighbors (similar to the idea of BCP38, that things 'should'
  be fine if everyone filters their downstreams.)
- Your implementability point is very valid.

To address both points, it might make sense to move this to a softer
recommendation to "Monitoring the global number of prefixes ingested
from each peer/downstream, and alerting if that number increases too
quickly" or something similar;

Then again, the attack in itself kind-of works; Well, not against most
major operators, but as soon as it goes to tier 2-3, there quickly are
funny cornercase-legacy-things around which die surprisingly quickly if
there is a sudden GRT jump by 10-20k prefixes or more.

It often boils down to walking on a very thin lines when it comes to
how many additional routes can be ingested, basically playing constant
catchup to find work-arounds for the next $month(s) until yet another
device can finally be decomissioned.

So, ultimately, I am not sure; More input appreciated.

With best regards,
Tobias


-- 
Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig
T +31 616 80 98 99
M tob...@fiebig.nl

___
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow


Re: [GROW] draft-fiebig-grow-bgpopsecupd-00 / Updating BCP194

2023-10-26 Thread Martin Pels

Hi Tobias,

On 22/10/2023 21:34, Tobias Fiebig wrote:

- Add large-communities/scrubbing


I think extended (RFC4360) communities should also be added here.

Another point to add in this section is scrubbing communities from a 
received route if the number of attached communities is excessively high 
(e.g. > 100).



- Add MAY for scrubbing of attributes


"operators MAY opt to scrub all BGP attributes known to cause service 
disruptions"


I would suggest replacing the word "all" with "specific", or to add a 
line explicitly clarifying not to scrub unknown transitive attributes.



- Add max-prefix limits and global limits


The global limits seem to offer no real benefit in addition to 
per-session limits. The referenced paper mentions Per-Origin AS limits, 
not the per-Neighbor AS limits mentioned in the draft. This also seems 
to be unimplementable, given that routers act independently on prefixes 
they receive.


Kind regards,
Martin

___
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow


Re: [GROW] Working Group Call for Adoption draft-francois-grow-bmp-loc-peer (start 24/Oct/2023 end 07/Nov/2023)

2023-10-26 Thread Luuk Hendriks
Hi all,

I think this is a useful idea and a good use case for what's offered by
the bmp-tlv draft, so +1 on support.


 luuk


On Tue 24 Oct 2023, 13:34, Job Snijders wrote:
> Dear GROW,
> 
> The authors of draft-francois-grow-bmp-loc-peer asked whether GROW
> working group could consider adoption of the internet-draft.
> 
> This message is a request to the group for feedback on whether this
> internet-draft should be adopted.
> 
> Title: BMP Loc-RIB: Peer address
> Abstract:
>BMP Loc-RIB lets a BMP publisher set the Peer Address value of a path
>information to zero.  This document introduces the option to
>communicate the actual peer from which a path was received when
>advertising that path with BMP Loc-RIB.
> 
> The Internet-Draft can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-francois-grow-bmp-loc-peer/
> 
> Please share with the mailing list if you are think this work should be
> adopted by GROW, willing to review and/or otherwise contribute to this
> draft!
> 
> WG Adoption call ends November 7th, 2023.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Job / Chris
> GROW co-chairs
> 
> ___
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

___
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow