> On Jul 6, 2018, at 8:59 AM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > >> Why anyone would need BMP wrapper to monitor IGP ? > > probably similar reasons that folk seem to need bgp-ls to get the > is-is/ospf databases. is-is and ospf have decades of complexity > layered on un-simple bases. so we seek yet another layer of gunk > through which to see them more 'simply.' > > i would say an optimistic view might be that it will take a couple > more decades to gunk up bgp-ls and bmp so that we want yet another > layer. but it would appear that my optimism is not warranted.
Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it… Acee > > randy > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > l...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow