Re: mips/*/time.h

2009-12-04 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
Robert Millan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In mips branch grub_cpu_idle() is provided by grub/mips/yeeloong/time.h
> and grub/mips/qemu-mips/time.h, but there's no grub/mips/time.h.
>
> This breaks mipsel-emu port, which lacks this definition.  Why not merge
> mips/yeeloong/time.h and mips/qemu-mips/time.h into mips/time.h ?  Both
> files are identical.
>
>   
Both are stubs actually. Why does *-emu needs these files at all? *-emu
doesn't see this type of machine info. It should just use host function
for both cpu_idle and get_rtc


-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel


Re: mips/*/time.h

2009-12-04 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 05:24:02PM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko 
wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In mips branch grub_cpu_idle() is provided by grub/mips/yeeloong/time.h
> > and grub/mips/qemu-mips/time.h, but there's no grub/mips/time.h.
> >
> > This breaks mipsel-emu port, which lacks this definition.  Why not merge
> > mips/yeeloong/time.h and mips/qemu-mips/time.h into mips/time.h ?  Both
> > files are identical.
> >
> >   
> Both are stubs actually. Why does *-emu needs these files at all? *-emu
> doesn't see this type of machine info. It should just use host function
> for both cpu_idle and get_rtc

grub_cpu_idle is implemented as an inline stub, which resides in time.h.

-- 
Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."


___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel