Re: GLib and Gtk+ branched for 2.15.0

2007-11-21 Thread Renato Araujo
And about offscreen redirection[1]? Will be in the next release?


[1] Bug  318807 - http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=318807

On Nov 19, 2007 1:12 PM, Emmanuele Bassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 16:23 +0100, Tim Janik wrote:

   upstream GLib and Gtk+ have been branched now. as of this morning,
 both trunks
   are at 2.15.0, and stable branches have been created for bugfixes:
  http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/glib/branches/glib-2-14/
  http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gtk+/branches/gtk-2-12/
  
   so the plan is to release GLib-2.16.0 and Gtk+-2.16.0 in sync again
 at the end
   of this development phase.
  
   Oh? Is the plan still to release a glib with gio a bit earlier so that
   it can hit Gnome 2.22 (without the corresponding Gtk+ release)?
 
  it'd probably be good to resume (bi-)weekly IRC meetings to discuss this
  and similar issues.

 yep: I've just updated the wiki page[1] and will send the reminder on
 gtk-devel-list and the announces list later today.

 current meeting points:

  * gio/gvfs
  * gsettings
  * extended-layout hints

 ciao,
  Emmanuele

 +++

 [1] http://live.gnome.org/GTK+/Meetings


 --
 Emmanuele Bassi,
 W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.net
 B: http://log.emmanuelebassi.net

 ___
 gtk-devel-list mailing list
 gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list




-- 
Renato Araujo Oliveira Filho
Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia - INdT
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list


GLib and Gtk+ branched for 2.15.0

2007-11-19 Thread Tim Janik
Hay all.

upstream GLib and Gtk+ have been branched now. as of this morning, both trunks
are at 2.15.0, and stable branches have been created for bugfixes:
   http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/glib/branches/glib-2-14/
   http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gtk+/branches/gtk-2-12/

so the plan is to release GLib-2.16.0 and Gtk+-2.16.0 in sync again at the end
of this development phase.

---
ciaoTJ
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list


Re: GLib and Gtk+ branched for 2.15.0

2007-11-19 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2007/11/19, Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Hay all.

 upstream GLib and Gtk+ have been branched now. as of this morning, both trunks
 are at 2.15.0, and stable branches have been created for bugfixes:
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/glib/branches/glib-2-14/
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gtk+/branches/gtk-2-12/

 so the plan is to release GLib-2.16.0 and Gtk+-2.16.0 in sync again at the end
 of this development phase.

Not that I'm against it, but is there a rationale/discussion for this somewhere?

Don't remember seeing anything on this list, but that might be just me
and my million mailing lists...

-- 
Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Powered by http://movial.fi
Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list


Re: GLib and Gtk+ branched for 2.15.0

2007-11-19 Thread Tim Janik
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Kalle Vahlman wrote:

 2007/11/19, Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Hay all.

 upstream GLib and Gtk+ have been branched now. as of this morning, both 
 trunks
 are at 2.15.0, and stable branches have been created for bugfixes:
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/glib/branches/glib-2-14/
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gtk+/branches/gtk-2-12/

 so the plan is to release GLib-2.16.0 and Gtk+-2.16.0 in sync again at the 
 end
 of this development phase.

 Not that I'm against it, but is there a rationale/discussion for this 
 somewhere?

there is no strong technical reason either way.
having different MINOR version numbers for glib and gtk+ has been a constant
matter of confusion in emails and during meetings, so syncing them is simply
going to make things easier for humans.

 Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
ciaoTJ
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list


Re: GLib and Gtk+ branched for 2.15.0

2007-11-19 Thread Alexander Larsson

On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 11:18 +0100, Tim Janik wrote:
 Hay all.
 
 upstream GLib and Gtk+ have been branched now. as of this morning, both trunks
 are at 2.15.0, and stable branches have been created for bugfixes:
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/glib/branches/glib-2-14/
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gtk+/branches/gtk-2-12/
 
 so the plan is to release GLib-2.16.0 and Gtk+-2.16.0 in sync again at the end
 of this development phase.

Oh? Is the plan still to release a glib with gio a bit earlier so that
it can hit Gnome 2.22 (without the corresponding Gtk+ release)?


___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list


Re: GLib and Gtk+ branched for 2.15.0

2007-11-19 Thread Mathias Hasselmann

Am Montag, den 19.11.2007, 11:18 +0100 schrieb Tim Janik:
 Hay all.
 
 upstream GLib and Gtk+ have been branched now.

That's cool. So I'd like to merge my extended layout work[1] now - 
unless someone says STOP, want to review first.

Ciao,
Mathias

[1] As found in the extended-layout branch and Bug #101968.
-- 
Mathias Hasselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://taschenorakel.de/


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list


Re: GLib and Gtk+ branched for 2.15.0

2007-11-19 Thread Emmanuele Bassi

On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 16:23 +0100, Tim Janik wrote:

  upstream GLib and Gtk+ have been branched now. as of this morning, both 
  trunks
  are at 2.15.0, and stable branches have been created for bugfixes:
 http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/glib/branches/glib-2-14/
 http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gtk+/branches/gtk-2-12/
 
  so the plan is to release GLib-2.16.0 and Gtk+-2.16.0 in sync again at the 
  end
  of this development phase.
 
  Oh? Is the plan still to release a glib with gio a bit earlier so that
  it can hit Gnome 2.22 (without the corresponding Gtk+ release)?
 
 it'd probably be good to resume (bi-)weekly IRC meetings to discuss this
 and similar issues.

yep: I've just updated the wiki page[1] and will send the reminder on
gtk-devel-list and the announces list later today.

current meeting points:

  * gio/gvfs
  * gsettings
  * extended-layout hints

ciao,
 Emmanuele

+++

[1] http://live.gnome.org/GTK+/Meetings


-- 
Emmanuele Bassi,
W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.net
B: http://log.emmanuelebassi.net

___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list