Memory-buffer only port?

2008-05-19 Thread Joshua Chia
I'm trying to use the GTK port of WebKit to render web pages to image
files.  This normally would involve a simple hack, but I'm running this on a
Linux system that has no X11 or DirectFB.  Is there a port of GTK that only
uses a simple memory buffer without any hardware support?  If not, could
anyone give me an idea of how much work I should expect to do for making
such a port and roughly which areas I would need to work on?

Josh
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list


Re: Memory-buffer only port?

2008-05-19 Thread Dominic Lachowicz
It'd probably be easier to just install Xvfb: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xvfb

2008/5/16 Joshua Chia [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 I'm trying to use the GTK port of WebKit to render web pages to image
 files.  This normally would involve a simple hack, but I'm running this on a
 Linux system that has no X11 or DirectFB.  Is there a port of GTK that only
 uses a simple memory buffer without any hardware support?  If not, could
 anyone give me an idea of how much work I should expect to do for making
 such a port and roughly which areas I would need to work on?

 Josh


 ___
 gtk-devel-list mailing list
 gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list





-- 
Counting bodies like sheep to the rhythm of the war drums.
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list