Moving maemo-gtk as gtk+ branch?

2007-06-01 Thread Tommi Komulainen
Hi,

As there's growing interest for Hildon outside the maemo context we're
currently discussing moving Hildon to gnome.org infrastructure to give
it more independent status. The plan is to ensure that Hildon can be
used with stock gtk+, though with somewhat limited capabilities.

However we'll still need to maintain our branch of gtk+ for the time
being and with Hildon moving to gnome.org it would be somewhat awkward
to have the gtk+ branch elsewhere.

Now my question is, do you think it would make sense to move maemo gtk+
to a gtk+ branch, or would you prefer us maintaining it elsewhere?


-- 
Tommi Komulainen<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list


Re: Moving maemo-gtk as gtk+ branch?

2007-06-01 Thread Matthias Clasen
On 6/1/07, Tommi Komulainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As there's growing interest for Hildon outside the maemo context we're
> currently discussing moving Hildon to gnome.org infrastructure to give
> it more independent status. The plan is to ensure that Hildon can be
> used with stock gtk+, though with somewhat limited capabilities.
>
> However we'll still need to maintain our branch of gtk+ for the time
> being and with Hildon moving to gnome.org it would be somewhat awkward
> to have the gtk+ branch elsewhere.
>
> Now my question is, do you think it would make sense to move maemo gtk+
> to a gtk+ branch, or would you prefer us maintaining it elsewhere?

I don't see any particular problem with a maemo branch. If the
longterm goal is to reduce the delta down to zero, it might be good if
there was an uptodate list of the remaining differences and their
merge status. Maybe that already exists somewhere in the maemo wiki
and I am not aware of it...
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list


Re: Moving maemo-gtk as gtk+ branch?

2007-06-01 Thread Xan
On 6/2/07, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/1/07, Tommi Komulainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As there's growing interest for Hildon outside the maemo context we're
> > currently discussing moving Hildon to gnome.org infrastructure to give
> > it more independent status. The plan is to ensure that Hildon can be
> > used with stock gtk+, though with somewhat limited capabilities.
> >
> > However we'll still need to maintain our branch of gtk+ for the time
> > being and with Hildon moving to gnome.org it would be somewhat awkward
> > to have the gtk+ branch elsewhere.
> >
> > Now my question is, do you think it would make sense to move maemo gtk+
> > to a gtk+ branch, or would you prefer us maintaining it elsewhere?
>
> I don't see any particular problem with a maemo branch. If the
> longterm goal is to reduce the delta down to zero, it might be good if
> there was an uptodate list of the remaining differences and their
> merge status. Maybe that already exists somewhere in the maemo wiki
> and I am not aware of it...

http://live.gnome.org/Maemo/Gtk210Changes has all the gory details of
the delta against upstream. The longterm goal is to reduce the
difference as much as possible yes (and we did great progress in the
last few months).

Cheers, Xan

> ___
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
>
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list


Re: Moving maemo-gtk as gtk+ branch?

2007-06-01 Thread Tommi Komulainen
On 6/2/07, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't see any particular problem with a maemo branch. If the
> longterm goal is to reduce the delta down to zero, it might be good if
> there was an uptodate list of the remaining differences and their
> merge status. Maybe that already exists somewhere in the maemo wiki
> and I am not aware of it...

We have such a list and it was recently moved to gnome.org:
http://live.gnome.org/Maemo/Gtk210Changes

However I'm not sure we can get down to zero any time soon. Hopefully
very, very close eventually, but maybe not down to zero.


-- 
Tommi Komulainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list