On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 12:34 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 13.12.2007, 12:17 +0100 schrieb Alexander Larsson:
If we add things like GSettings to libgio (to avoid adding yet
more .so's) then things look even more weird. GIOSettings?
Off-topic, but random though since we couldn't find a name of the
utility .so between libgobject and libgtk yet.
What's about libgcore.so?
I think the current plan is that the symbols would be in libgio.so, but
then we can make the actual modules be separate, with their own .pc
file and headers in a separate subdir.
I'm not sure I like this, as I don't quite see the point of fragmenting
the headers etc like that, but it does make the name of the .so an
academic issue, as it hides it behind the .pc file names which is what
developers see.
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
