Hi,
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
poch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 09/06/10 00:49, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
• how to deal with gtk-requiring libraries, with regards to the API/ABI break
- libraries will have to do an ABI bump to match the ABI bump in gtk
- we need to communicate this on the various venues and remind the
maintainers
ACTION: mclasen to draft a mail for gtk-devel-list/desktop-announce
Forgive me if I misunderstood it, but isn't this the sort of thing that would
be
avoided if GTK+ used symbol versioning? If so, using it from 3.0 onwards may
be
a good idea.
If you read the recent thread,
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2010-May/msg00088.html
as it points out, symbol versioning only helps with symbols. The ABI
bump would still be required for types, properties, signals, etc.
Havoc
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
