Re: fdwalk
On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 13:15 +, Markus Teich via gtk-devel-list wrote: > Heyho, > > I discovered you have a fdwalk implementation in glib/gspawn.c which > is not exported as a usable symbol. Is there any reason for this? If > not, I'd suggest exporting that symbol and maybe even another wrapper > that takes a list of FDs to keep open instead of the callback pointer > and closes all other ones. Closing all fds except some specific ones > is a common pattern before exec()ing. GLib provides higher-level subprocess handling functionality with GSubprocess; the g_subprocess_launcher_take_fd() and g_subprocess_launcher_set_child_setup() functions are relevant here. I’m not sure there’s enough demand to expose an fdwalk() implementation to everyone. Philip signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: fdwalk
Hey, The general answer to this kind of question is ’because nobody has needed it’. If you can demonstrate a need for a public fdwalk() implementation, which would be used by multiple apps, for a purpose which can’t just be served by GSubprocess or g_spawn_*(), then please file a bug about it on https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product =glib. Philip On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 14:40 +, Markus Teich via gtk-devel-list wrote: > Heyho, > > I'm going to unsubscribe from the list now to avoid noise. If someone > gets interested in this, please CC me in any response. Thanks! > > --Markus > > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 4:46 PM Markus Teichoogle.com> wrote: > > Heyho, > > > > I discovered you have a fdwalk implementation in glib/gspawn.c > > which is not exported as a usable symbol. Is there any reason for > > this? If not, I'd suggest exporting that symbol and maybe even > > another wrapper that takes a list of FDs to keep open instead of > > the callback pointer and closes all other ones. Closing all fds > > except some specific ones is a common pattern before exec()ing. > > > > --Markus > > > > > > ___ > > gtk-devel-list mailing list > > gtk-devel-list@gnome.org > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: fdwalk
Heyho, I'm going to unsubscribe from the list now to avoid noise. If someone gets interested in this, please CC me in any response. Thanks! --Markus On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 4:46 PM Markus Teich < mteich+gtk-devel-l...@google.com> wrote: > Heyho, > > I discovered you have a fdwalk implementation in glib/gspawn.c which is > not exported as a usable symbol. Is there any reason for this? If not, I'd > suggest exporting that symbol and maybe even another wrapper that takes a > list of FDs to keep open instead of the callback pointer and closes all > other ones. Closing all fds except some specific ones is a common pattern > before exec()ing. > > --Markus > > > -- > Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Str. 33, 80636 München, Geschäftsführer: > Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado, Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, > HRB 86891, Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg > This e-mail is confidential. If you received this communication by > mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please erase all copies > and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone to the wrong > person. > -- Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Str. 33, 80636 München, Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado, Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg This e-mail is confidential. If you received this communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone to the wrong person. ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list