Re: Building the enum-types (with or without pango-ot.h)

[John Emmas]

On 14/08/2017 18:10, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:

You can ignore pango-ot.h for now.



Thanks Behdad,

John
___
gtk-i18n-list mailing list
gtk-i18n-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-i18n-list

Re: Building the enum-types (with or without pango-ot.h)

[Behdad Esfahbod]

You can ignore pango-ot.h for now.

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 10:02 AM, John Emmas 
wrote:

> When generating the enum-types modules ('pango-enum-types.c' and
> 'pango-enum-types.h') should I be referencing (i.e. including) pango-ot.h
> during the process?  I only realised recently that I hadn't been including
> it.  If I do include it, an extra function gets added to the generated
> files ('pango_ot_table_type_get_type()').  But when I then compile
> pango-enum-types.c, MSVC complains because PANGO_OT_TABLE_GSUB and
> PANGO_OT_TABLE_GPOS are undeclared identifiers.
>
> I can fix that problem by modifying pango.h to add a #include for
> .  Pango itself then builds correctly.
>
> Unfortunately though... adding that extra #include then causes mayhem when
> building pangoft2.
>
> Should I just forget about pango-ot.h (i.e simply not reference it when
> I'm generating the enum-types in the first place?)  Everything seems to
> build fine if I just leave it out...
>
> Thanks, John
> ___
> gtk-i18n-list mailing list
> gtk-i18n-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-i18n-list
>



-- 
behdad
http://behdad.org/
___
gtk-i18n-list mailing list
gtk-i18n-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-i18n-list