Added Luajit 2.0.3

[Raimon Grau]

Hi,
Here's Luajit 2.0.3 updated recipe.


From c2d3eaaac53e38235bcdfa2f33160b25ca25d237 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Raimon Grau raimons...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 12:34:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Added Luajit 2.0.3

---
 gnu/packages/lua.scm | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/lua.scm b/gnu/packages/lua.scm
index 81caa26..8394afb 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lua.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lua.scm
@@ -66,13 +66,13 @@ for configuration, scripting, and rapid prototyping.)
 (define-public luajit
   (package
 (name luajit)
-(version 2.0.2)
+(version 2.0.3)
 (source (origin
   (method url-fetch)
   (uri (string-append http://luajit.org/download/LuaJIT-;
   version .tar.gz))
   (sha256
-   (base32 
0f3cykihfdn3gi6na9p0xjd4jnv26z18m441n5vyg42q9abh4ln0
+   (base32 
0ydxpqkmsn2c341j4r2v6r5r0ig3kbwv3i9jran3iv81s6r6rgjm
 (build-system gnu-build-system)
 (arguments
  '(#:tests? #f  ;luajit is distributed without tests
-- 
1.8.3.2

Re: [PATCH 2/2] guix substitute-binary: Support the Signature field of a narinfo file.

[Nikita Karetnikov]

 I was about to say you could push to master, but since the new
 substitute-binary will refuse any unsigned archives[*], it may be wiser
 to push to a special branch so we can test it in real life before
 merging into master.

 Should the special branch be based on ‘master’ or ‘core-updates’?

 On ‘master’.

Done.  Since some tests on ‘master’ fail for me, could you run ‘make
check’ to make sure that it doesn’t break anything?


pgp4farRFby2k.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Added Luajit 2.0.3

[Andreas Enge]

Hello,

On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:40:08PM +0100, Raimon Grau wrote:
 Here's Luajit 2.0.3 updated recipe.

thanks for the update! Could you please add a git log entry as per the
examples already present in the git repository, and create the patch with
git format-patch?

Thanks in advance,

Andreas