Re: GWL 0.3.0 released

2021-02-11 Thread Bengt Richter
On +2021-02-11 21:37:56 +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> 
> Bengt Richter  writes:
> 
> > gpg --verify gwl-0.3.0.tar.gz.sig
> > gpg: assuming signed data in 'gwl-0.3.0.tar.gz'
> > gpg: Signature made Sat 06 Feb 2021 09:28:59 PM CET
> > gpg:using RSA key BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC
> > gpg: Good signature from "Ricardo Wurmus (Work) 
> > " [expired]
> > gpg: aka "rekado " [expired]
> > ┌──┐
> > │ gpg: Note: This key has expired! │
> > └──┘
> 
> You should get a fresh key from keys.openpgp.org
> Its expiry is regularly extended.
>
Thanks for all your Fosdem/guix work first of all, but I expected

--8<---cut here---start->8---
[17:29 ~/bs]$ gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-keys 
BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC
gpg: key 197A5888235FACAC: 16 signatures not checked due to missing keys
┌───┐
│ gpg: key 197A5888235FACAC: "Ricardo Wurmus (Work) 
" not changed │
└───┘
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:  unchanged: 1
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

to give me an updated key, and am left wondering why it didn't :)
It seems I have a wrong default for keyserver:

--8<---cut here---start->8---
[22:21 ~/bs]$ gpg --refresh-keys
gpg: refreshing 6 keys from hkp://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
gpg: key 197A5888235FACAC: 14 signatures not checked due to missing keys
┌───┐
│ gpg: key 197A5888235FACAC: "Ricardo Wurmus (Work) 
" not changed │
└───┘
--8<---cut here---end--->8---


Maybe the original advice for getting a key should be extended with the
fresh key advice above (preferably the literal gpg command line, my guess re 
that boxed below).
This seems to do it:
┌───┐
│ gpg --recv-keys BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC --keyserver 
keys.openpgp.org │
└───┘
(though my first try was "gpg --refresh-keys --keyserver keys.openpgp.org"
which only found you for the keys I have).

--8<---cut here---start->8---
[22:44 ~/bs]$ gpg --recv-keys BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC 
--keyserver keys.openpgp.org
gpg: Note: '--keyserver' is not considered an option
gpg: "--keyserver" not a key ID: skipping
gpg: "keys.openpgp.org" not a key ID: skipping
gpg: key 197A5888235FACAC: 16 signatures not checked due to missing keys
gpg: key 197A5888235FACAC: "Ricardo Wurmus (Work) 
" not changed
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:  unchanged: 1
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

Now gpg --verify works \o/ :)

> 
> Ricardo
-- 
Regards,
Bengt Richter



Re: GWL 0.3.0 released

2021-02-11 Thread Ricardo Wurmus

Bengt Richter  writes:

> gpg --verify gwl-0.3.0.tar.gz.sig
> gpg: assuming signed data in 'gwl-0.3.0.tar.gz'
> gpg: Signature made Sat 06 Feb 2021 09:28:59 PM CET
> gpg:using RSA key BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC
> gpg: Good signature from "Ricardo Wurmus (Work) 
> " [expired]
> gpg: aka "rekado " [expired]
> ┌──┐
> │ gpg: Note: This key has expired! │
> └──┘

You should get a fresh key from keys.openpgp.org
Its expiry is regularly extended.


Ricardo


Re: GWL 0.3.0 released

2021-02-11 Thread Leo Famulari
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 07:03:31PM +, Cook, Malcolm wrote:
> 
> Do we know if a video recording Ricardo’s FOSDEM talk is/will be available?  
> I don’t (yet?) see it in FOSDEM’s Youtube channel.  Thanks!

Videos are on the way:

https://twitter.com/bitcynth/status/1358761774577819650



RE: GWL 0.3.0 released

2021-02-11 Thread Cook, Malcolm

Do we know if a video recording Ricardo’s FOSDEM talk is/will be available?  I 
don’t (yet?) see it in FOSDEM’s Youtube channel.  Thanks!



Re: GWL 0.3.0 released

2021-02-11 Thread Bengt Richter
On +2021-02-10 22:05:45 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Heya,
> 
> Ricardo Wurmus  skribis:
> 
> > The Guix Workflow Language 0.3.0 has been released.
> >
> > I forgot to Cc y’all in the release announcement:
> >
> >https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gwl-devel/2021-02/msg0.html
> 
> Congrats on all the hard work!
> 
> If you didn’t follow FOSDEM, don’t miss Ricardo’s talk:
> 
>   https://fosdem.org/2021/schedule/event/guix_workflow/
> 
> Ludo’.
>
--8<---cut here---start->8---
gpg --verify gwl-0.3.0.tar.gz.sig
gpg: assuming signed data in 'gwl-0.3.0.tar.gz'
gpg: Signature made Sat 06 Feb 2021 09:28:59 PM CET
gpg:using RSA key BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC
gpg: Good signature from "Ricardo Wurmus (Work) " 
[expired]
gpg: aka "rekado " [expired]
┌──┐
│ gpg: Note: This key has expired! │
└──┘
Primary key fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
[17:26 ~/bs]$ wl-paste 
gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-keys 
BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC
[17:29 ~/bs]$ echo $(wl-paste )
gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-keys 
BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC
[17:29 ~/bs]$ gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-keys 
BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC
gpg: key 197A5888235FACAC: 16 signatures not checked due to missing keys
┌───┐
│ gpg: key 197A5888235FACAC: "Ricardo Wurmus (Work) 
" not changed │
└───┘
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:  unchanged: 1
[17:30 ~/bs]$ gpg --verify gwl-0.3.0.tar.gz.sig
gpg: assuming signed data in 'gwl-0.3.0.tar.gz'
gpg: Signature made Sat 06 Feb 2021 09:28:59 PM CET
gpg:using RSA key BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC
gpg: Good signature from "Ricardo Wurmus (Work) " 
[expired]
gpg: aka "rekado " [expired]
┌──┐
│ gpg: Note: This key has expired! │
└──┘
Primary key fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
[17:30 ~/bs]$ 
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

Thought someone might want to know.

-- 
Regards,
Bengt Richter



Re: GWL 0.3.0 released

2021-02-10 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Heya,

Ricardo Wurmus  skribis:

> The Guix Workflow Language 0.3.0 has been released.
>
> I forgot to Cc y’all in the release announcement:
>
>https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gwl-devel/2021-02/msg0.html

Congrats on all the hard work!

If you didn’t follow FOSDEM, don’t miss Ricardo’s talk:

  https://fosdem.org/2021/schedule/event/guix_workflow/

Ludo’.



GWL 0.3.0 released

2021-02-06 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hey Guix,

The Guix Workflow Language 0.3.0 has been released.

I forgot to Cc y’all in the release announcement:

   https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gwl-devel/2021-02/msg0.html

-- 
Ricardo