Re: Guix's Answer to PyInstaller
> Hey! > ¿Qué tal? Hola, aqui gozando con bolsas y derivaciones ;() > but I suspect it requires a pretty heavy magic for non-python packages. I imagine not much magic for Common Lisp since we can produce a static binary with sbcl, etc. > I'd love to see this happening, mostly because I have clients I'd like to be > able to serve... If > you want to dig on this issue, please let me know your findings. Maybe I can > help! Another software to compare to is PyOxidizer which is used for producing binaries that embed Python: https://github.com/indygreg/PyOxidizer > Thanks for bringing this up! De nada, anytime! > [^1]: See https://ekaitz.elenq.tech/windows.html Nice blog post. I'll read it soon. all best, jgart
Re: Guix's Answer to PyInstaller
Hey! ¿Qué tal? --- Original Message --- On Friday, March 31st, 2023 at 7:33 PM, jgart wrote: > Hi Guixers, > > What is Guix's answer to PyInstaller? > > `guix pack --list-formats`? > > https://github.com/pyinstaller/pyinstaller > > I haven't reviewed all of PyInstaller yet to see where feature parity fails > or differences should be noted. > > On my TODO list. I've been thinking on this for a while, mostly for windows[^1]. We could manage to generate something similar to this, but I suspect it requires a pretty heavy magic for non-python packages. I'd love to see this happening, mostly because I have clients I'd like to be able to serve... If you want to dig on this issue, please let me know your findings. Maybe I can help! Thanks for bringing this up! [^1]: See https://ekaitz.elenq.tech/windows.html and also https://issues.guix.gnu.org/62226
Guix's Answer to PyInstaller
Hi Guixers, What is Guix's answer to PyInstaller? `guix pack --list-formats`? https://github.com/pyinstaller/pyinstaller I haven't reviewed all of PyInstaller yet to see where feature parity fails or differences should be noted. On my TODO list.
