Re: Imagemagick with OpenEXR support
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023, 01:37 Csepp wrote: > > Théo Maxime Tyburn writes: > > > Csepp writes: > > > >> Théo Maxime Tyburn writes: > >> > >>> ``` > >>> checking for OpenEXR >= 1.0.6... no > >>> [...] > >>> Delegate library configuration: > >>> OpenEXR --with-openexr=yes no > >>> ``` > >> > >> If we are going by semver, then 1.0.6 is incompatible with 3.x. Maybe > >> it expects an older version? > > > > Hum. But it seems to look for a version that is greater or equal > > 1.0.6. Shouldn't 3.x be matched ? Maybe I misunderstand semver. > > You mean 3.x could have incompatibilities so that is what is is not > > matched ? > > A major version bump is supposed to mean a backwards incompatible > change, so depending on how the greater-than operator works, 1.x might > not be "smaller" than 3.x. It's not a total ordering, I think it's a... > semilattice? Or something along those lines. > Ah I see. That would make sense. Though semver.org says: ``` Precedence is determined by the first difference when comparing each of these identifiers from left to right as follows: Major, minor, and patch versions are always compared numerically. Example: 1.0.0 < 2.0.0 < 2.1.0 < 2.1.1. ``` But maybe the imagemagick config also specifies a maximum version and doesn't say it out loud in the printed output. I'll have a look >
Re: Imagemagick with OpenEXR support
Théo Maxime Tyburn writes: > Csepp writes: > >> Théo Maxime Tyburn writes: >> >>> ``` >>> checking for OpenEXR >= 1.0.6... no >>> [...] >>> Delegate library configuration: >>> OpenEXR --with-openexr=yes no >>> ``` >> >> If we are going by semver, then 1.0.6 is incompatible with 3.x. Maybe >> it expects an older version? > > Hum. But it seems to look for a version that is greater or equal > 1.0.6. Shouldn't 3.x be matched ? Maybe I misunderstand semver. > You mean 3.x could have incompatibilities so that is what is is not > matched ? A major version bump is supposed to mean a backwards incompatible change, so depending on how the greater-than operator works, 1.x might not be "smaller" than 3.x. It's not a total ordering, I think it's a... semilattice? Or something along those lines.
Re: Imagemagick with OpenEXR support
Csepp writes: > Théo Maxime Tyburn writes: > >> ``` >> checking for OpenEXR >= 1.0.6... no >> [...] >> Delegate library configuration: >> OpenEXR --with-openexr=yes no >> ``` > > If we are going by semver, then 1.0.6 is incompatible with 3.x. Maybe > it expects an older version? Hum. But it seems to look for a version that is greater or equal 1.0.6. Shouldn't 3.x be matched ? Maybe I misunderstand semver. You mean 3.x could have incompatibilities so that is what is is not matched ?
Re: Imagemagick with OpenEXR support
Théo Maxime Tyburn writes:
> Hi guixers,
>
> I am trying to add OpenEXR to the current Imagemagick.
>
> I tried this out
>
> ```
> (package
> (inherit imagemagick)
> (inputs (append `(("openexr" ,openexr)) (package-inputs imagemagick
> ```
>
> but in the configure phase:
> ```
> checking for OpenEXR >= 1.0.6... no
> [...]
> Delegate library configuration:
> OpenEXR --with-openexr=yes no
> ```
>
> I'm not sure why OpenEXR is not visible at configure time. There doesn't
> seem to be any manual addition of references to include or lib
> directories from the store in the current imagemagick package
> definition. So I assume it should just work fine.
>
> Any idea?
>
> Théo
If we are going by semver, then 1.0.6 is incompatible with 3.x. Maybe
it expects an older version?
Imagemagick with OpenEXR support
Hi guixers,
I am trying to add OpenEXR to the current Imagemagick.
I tried this out
```
(package
(inherit imagemagick)
(inputs (append `(("openexr" ,openexr)) (package-inputs imagemagick
```
but in the configure phase:
```
checking for OpenEXR >= 1.0.6... no
[...]
Delegate library configuration:
OpenEXR --with-openexr=yes no
```
I'm not sure why OpenEXR is not visible at configure time. There doesn't
seem to be any manual addition of references to include or lib
directories from the store in the current imagemagick package
definition. So I assume it should just work fine.
Any idea?
Théo
