Re: 0.14.1?
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:07:07PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Now that so much time has passed and so many packages have been added > and updated we could even do 0.15.0. This should be one of the few pleasures of the release managers, to decide about version numbers and code names! Andreas
Re: 0.14.1?
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Efraim Flashner skribis: > >> We now have aarch64 build machines, but there wasn't one when 0.14.0 was >> released. This means that if someone installs guix on aarch64 and tries >> to run 'guix pull' then they have to build from the bootstrap binaries >> to guix before pulling and then compiling HEAD. I tried this myself on >> Scaleway, which offers aarch64 VMs, and was met by test errors. > > I’m all for 0.14.1 (we initially wanted to do that by FOSDEM…). Now that so much time has passed and so many packages have been added and updated we could even do 0.15.0. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net
Re: 0.14.1?
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 10:41:34AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I would like to add the new Shepherd as well, which should be ready > anytime soon. It would be important to fix bug https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30299 first, and maybe other shepherd related bugs in the tracker. Andreas
Re: 0.14.1?
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 10:41:34AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello, > > Efraim Flashner skribis: > > > We now have aarch64 build machines, but there wasn't one when 0.14.0 was > > released. This means that if someone installs guix on aarch64 and tries > > to run 'guix pull' then they have to build from the bootstrap binaries > > to guix before pulling and then compiling HEAD. I tried this myself on > > Scaleway, which offers aarch64 VMs, and was met by test errors. > > I’m all for 0.14.1 (we initially wanted to do that by FOSDEM…). > > I would like to add the new Shepherd as well, which should be ready > anytime soon. > > Thoughts? > > > Also, for aarch64 at least, berlin.guixsd.org should be added to the > > default substitute servers. > > I’ve pushed a change to default to berlin.guixsd.org on aarch64. People > still need to authorize the right key, though. > That shouldn't be too hard, if you use the install script and say 'yes' to using the substitute servers, it includes berlin.guixsd.org as a substitute server. -- Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: 0.14.1?
Hello, Efraim Flashner skribis: > We now have aarch64 build machines, but there wasn't one when 0.14.0 was > released. This means that if someone installs guix on aarch64 and tries > to run 'guix pull' then they have to build from the bootstrap binaries > to guix before pulling and then compiling HEAD. I tried this myself on > Scaleway, which offers aarch64 VMs, and was met by test errors. I’m all for 0.14.1 (we initially wanted to do that by FOSDEM…). I would like to add the new Shepherd as well, which should be ready anytime soon. Thoughts? > Also, for aarch64 at least, berlin.guixsd.org should be added to the > default substitute servers. I’ve pushed a change to default to berlin.guixsd.org on aarch64. People still need to authorize the right key, though. Ludo’.