Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> I've done some quick research over the various options.
>
> - lzip: better than gz and bzip2 for sure, possibly better than xz (at
> least according to the author).
>
> - plzip: for "parallel lzip". With 4 threads I was able to compress
> icecat 2.5x faster. It used 5x more memory though. The compression
> ratio is 1-2% worse.
>
> - lrzip: it would crash whenever I would change the compression level.
> Seems less stable. It's as fast as plzip, while being 1-2% less
> compressed. I don't think it's worth using.
>
> All in all, lzip is a definite win over most options. The main question
> is: lzip or plzip?
‘guix publish’ has its own worker pool and handles parallelism
internally, so in that context plain sequential lzip would be more
appropriate IMO.
Ludo’.
