Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
On Mon, 2022-11-28 at 18:22 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of > stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No rush, > though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer. > > Ludo’. > > ¹ https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/msg00059.html > ² https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-07/msg00059.html > ³ https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2022/10-years-of-stories-behind-guix/ > Yes, I agree for my contribution to the blog posts with the license under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later. Thanks, `~Eric Bavier signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
Hello everyone, Sorry for the late reply, but as I've been asked by Simon to provide a public answer I managed to retrieve this message to reply that I do agree with the new licensing of CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL 1.3 for my contribution to the "10 years of stories" : ) Have a nice day folks, Alice Le Mon, 28 Nov 2022 18:22:15 +0100, Ludovic Courtès a écrit : > Hello Guix! > > You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had > contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their > work under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no > Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹. > > I did not get replies from Danny Milosavljevic and Laura Lazzati²; > everyone else agreed publicly. > > In the meantime, we got a new blog post³ with lots of contributors, > thanks to Simon’s work. Unfortunately I think we did not discuss the > licensing terms. > > Therefore, I propose to apply the following patch, which leaves out a > couple of posts as “unlicensed”. From there on, we’ll have consistent > free licensing by default. > > Thoughts? > > Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years > of stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No > rush, though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer. > > Ludo’. > > ¹ https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/msg00059.html > ² https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-07/msg00059.html > ³ https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2022/10-years-of-stories-behind-guix/ >
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
Csepp writes: > I thought I agreed when I sent my part, but in case I haven't: > I agree to licensing your contribution under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL > version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, > and no Back-Cover Texts. s/your/mine/ I copied the text from the email I was sent and apparently didn't edit it properly.
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
Ludovic Courtès writes: Hello! Thanks Simon for pinging me! > You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had > contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their work > under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant > Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹. [..] > Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of > stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No rush, > though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer. Sure, I'm happy for my blog contributions to be licensed under these terms. Greetings, Janneke -- Janneke Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar® https://AvatarAcademy.com
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 18:22:15 +0100 Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello Guix! > > You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had > contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their > work under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no > Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹. > > I did not get replies from Danny Milosavljevic and Laura Lazzati²; > everyone else agreed publicly. > > In the meantime, we got a new blog post³ with lots of contributors, > thanks to Simon’s work. Unfortunately I think we did not discuss the > licensing terms. > > Therefore, I propose to apply the following patch, which leaves out a > couple of posts as “unlicensed”. From there on, we’ll have consistent > free licensing by default. > > Thoughts? > > Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years > of stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No > rush, though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer. > > Ludo’. > > ¹ https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/msg00059.html > ² https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-07/msg00059.html > ³ https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2022/10-years-of-stories-behind-guix/ > I thought I agreed when I sent my part, but in case I haven't: I agree to licensing your contribution under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. Björn pgpgmaqYQbyYK.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
> Do you agree to licensing your contribution under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL > version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and > no Back-Cover Texts? Yes, I agree. publickey - luis.felipe.la@protonmail.com - 0x12DE1598.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
Hi, > Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of > stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No rush, > though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer. I’m also fine with the terms proposed here. Lars
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
I thought I agreed when I sent my part, but in case I haven't: I agree to licensing your contribution under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
Hi, On Fri, 02 Dec 2022 at 17:06, zimoun wrote: > On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 at 18:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of >> stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No rush, >> though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer. > > I will do my best this week-end. Ouch, time is flying! I did today. Cheers, simon
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
Ludovic Courtès skribis: > You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had > contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their work > under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant > Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹. > > I did not get replies from Danny Milosavljevic and Laura Lazzati²; > everyone else agreed publicly. > > In the meantime, we got a new blog post³ with lots of contributors, > thanks to Simon’s work. Unfortunately I think we did not discuss the > licensing terms. > > Therefore, I propose to apply the following patch, which leaves out a > couple of posts as “unlicensed”. From there on, we’ll have consistent > free licensing by default. > > Thoughts? > > Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of > stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No rush, > though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer. > > Ludo’. Hi Ludo, I wrote a paragraph for the "10 years of stories behind Guix" post, and I agree with the proposed licensing. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
Hello, On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 06:22 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello Guix! > > You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had > contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their work > under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant > Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹. > > I did not get replies from Danny Milosavljevic and Laura Lazzati²; > everyone else agreed publicly. > > In the meantime, we got a new blog post³ with lots of contributors, > thanks to Simon’s work. Unfortunately I think we did not discuss the > licensing terms. > > Therefore, I propose to apply the following patch, which leaves out a > couple of posts as “unlicensed”. From there on, we’ll have consistent > free licensing by default. > > Thoughts? > > Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of > stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No rush, > though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer. > As an author for one of the paragraphs on the "10 years" blog post, consider this my agreement with these licensing terms. Thanks for helping get this sorted! John Kehayias
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
Hello Ludo, Ludovic Courtès writes: > You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had > contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their work > under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant > Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹. >⋮ > Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of > stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No rush, > though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer. I'm one of the author of that post, and I agree with these licensing terms. Thank you for addressing this topic! -- Thanks Thiago
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
Hi Ludo, Thanks for this clarification. It reminds me hpc.guix.info posts. :-) On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 at 18:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of > stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No rush, > though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer. I will do my best this week-end. Cheers, simon
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
Hi! Ludovic Courtès skribis: > Therefore, I propose to apply the following patch, which leaves out a > couple of posts as “unlicensed”. From there on, we’ll have consistent > free licensing by default. Thanks to everyone who provided feedback. I pushed the patch. Let’s see if we can eventually address the remaining unlicensed posts, in particular the 10 years one. Ludo’.
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Therefore, I propose to apply the following patch, which leaves out a Yes! The patch looks good. I‘m fine with that license. Regards, Florian
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
On 2022-11-28, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had > contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their work > under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant > Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹. ... > Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of > stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No rush, > though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer. Happy for my contribution to be under those licensing terms! live well, vagrant signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
Am Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 06:22:15PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their work > under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant > Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹. > > Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of > stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? Fine for me, of course. Andreas
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
Hi, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello Guix! > > You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had > contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their work > under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant > Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹. > > I did not get replies from Danny Milosavljevic and Laura Lazzati²; > everyone else agreed publicly. Perhaps try one last time; Danny is still around, I think. > In the meantime, we got a new blog post³ with lots of contributors, > thanks to Simon’s work. Unfortunately I think we did not discuss the > licensing terms. > > Therefore, I propose to apply the following patch, which leaves out a > couple of posts as “unlicensed”. From there on, we’ll have consistent > free licensing by default. > > Thoughts? LGTM. -- Thanks, Maxim
Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts
Hi, > > Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of > stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No rush, > though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer. I'm one of them. You can use what I wrote with the license you prefer. Consider it yours. Cheers, Ekaitz
