Re: Ocaml (was: Merging core-updates?)

2023-02-20 Thread Julien Lepiller
We can probably get rid of most 4.07 variants but I would keep the bootstrap 
(in the hope we can bootstrap later versions from it). 4.09 is still used for 
unison, and I think Andreas uses it a lot :)

I'd say remove all leaf 4.07 packages that are libraries only.

Le 20 février 2023 11:35:16 GMT+01:00, Simon Tournier 
 a écrit :
>Hi Julien,
>
>On dim., 19 févr. 2023 at 10:15, Julien Lepiller  wrote:
>> ocaml-4.14 and ocaml-5 don't have this issue. I just pushed a fix for
>> ocaml-4.09. I'll also have to fix ocaml-4.07 since it fails to build as
>> early as camlboot. It'll take a while to test. Thanks for pointing me
>> to that patch!
>
>Do we still keep 4.07 and 4.09?  And all the package variants?
>
>Cheers,
>simon



Re: Ocaml (was: Merging core-updates?)

2023-02-20 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi Julien,

On dim., 19 févr. 2023 at 10:15, Julien Lepiller  wrote:
> ocaml-4.14 and ocaml-5 don't have this issue. I just pushed a fix for
> ocaml-4.09. I'll also have to fix ocaml-4.07 since it fails to build as
> early as camlboot. It'll take a while to test. Thanks for pointing me
> to that patch!

Do we still keep 4.07 and 4.09?  And all the package variants?

Cheers,
simon



Re: Ocaml (was: Merging core-updates?)

2023-02-19 Thread Julien Lepiller
ocaml-4.14 and ocaml-5 don't have this issue. I just pushed a fix for
ocaml-4.09. I'll also have to fix ocaml-4.07 since it fails to build as
early as camlboot. It'll take a while to test. Thanks for pointing me
to that patch!

Le Sat, 18 Feb 2023 12:38:55 +0100,
Andreas Enge  a écrit :

> Am Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 12:03:31PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Enge:
> > this looks exactly like the line that posed problems for openjdk.
> > Maybe there is a patch? Could someone familiar with ocaml have a
> > look?  
> 
> It looks like this:
>https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/10266
> 
> Andreas
> 




Re: Ocaml (was: Merging core-updates?)

2023-02-18 Thread Andreas Enge
Am Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 12:03:31PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Enge:
> this looks exactly like the line that posed problems for openjdk.
> Maybe there is a patch? Could someone familiar with ocaml have a look?

It looks like this:
   https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/10266

Andreas