Re: packaging: what to do about these requiring systemd?

[Andy Tai]

There are now cases of packages linking to Systemd, not just checking
for installing init scripts.
should these be considered bugs of such packages (and we shall ask the
package authors to make systemd optional)?

On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 4:45 AM Ricardo Wurmus  wrote:
>
> Andy Tai  writes:
>
> > Some packages require systemd;
>
> Some of these packages are perfectly happy with elogind.  Others only
> check to decide what files to install (systemd unit files or those for
> another init system).
>
> --
> Ricardo



-- 
Andy Tai, a...@atai.org, Skype: licheng.tai, Line: andy_tai, WeChat: andytai1010
Year 2024 民國113年
自動的精神力是信仰與覺悟
自動的行為力是勞動與技能

Re: packaging: what to do about these requiring systemd?

[Ricardo Wurmus]

Andy Tai  writes:

> Some packages require systemd;

Some of these packages are perfectly happy with elogind.  Others only
check to decide what files to install (systemd unit files or those for
another init system).

-- 
Ricardo

packaging: what to do about these requiring systemd?

[Andy Tai]

Some packages require systemd; some may provide configure stage
options to disable systemd support which can be supplied by the
package definitions in Guix.  But for these that do not make systemd
support configurable, what is the general approach to make such
packages available in GNU Guix?