Re: [h-cost] Valuation of collection--again
Well, I'd think so. Fran otsisto wrote: So any costume that is the daughter's stays with the daughter and should not be up for sale unless the daughter wishes to sell it. Right? De -Original Message- BTW, I don't see that a father has any claim on his children's (or stepchildren's, if that's the case) personal posessions in a divorce suit. He's not divorcing the daughter. Fran Lavolta Press wrote: ___ h-costume mailing list h-costume@mail.indra.com http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume ___ h-costume mailing list h-costume@mail.indra.com http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
RE: [h-cost] Valuation of collection--again
So any costume that is the daughter's stays with the daughter and should not be up for sale unless the daughter wishes to sell it. Right? De -Original Message- BTW, I don't see that a father has any claim on his children's (or stepchildren's, if that's the case) personal posessions in a divorce suit. He's not divorcing the daughter. Fran Lavolta Press wrote: ___ h-costume mailing list h-costume@mail.indra.com http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
Re: [h-cost] Valuation of collection--again
BTW, I don't see that a father has any claim on his children's (or stepchildren's, if that's the case) personal posessions in a divorce suit. He's not divorcing the daughter. Fran Lavolta Press wrote: otsisto wrote: What I'd like to know is if most of these costumes are made for and worn by her and her daughter and thus proof of ownership, it therefore should NOT be shared property unless HE has been wearing the items himself as well. ___ h-costume mailing list h-costume@mail.indra.com http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
