Re: [h-cost] "Walking Art, " at the Italian Cultural Institute - chopines

2006-11-29 Thread Cin

"Round-heeled" reported a similar phenomenon but due to excessive
walking on the job--i.e., street-walker. This is a similar
"understanding" of mine
--Ruth Anne Baumgartner


I've always thought "round-heeled" was aimed more at the "easy to push
over" in the sexually available sense... not so much streetwalker as
er, um... "amateur enthusiast".

And in reference to the "Walking Art" exhibit article the photo
caption says "These 12-inch-high chopines are reproductions of a style
worn by Venetian women in the 16th century."  Well, pooh-pooh!  I've
never seen chopines that look like that.  The ones that are laced have
double rows of eyes and they dont have tongues like modern shoes. I
dont know of any with a heel cap. The ones that are closed toed are
usually mules. Most are open-toed. This is a modern shoe on a 16th-ISH
platform. It appears to be suede which is not a 16th leather
treatment. And as for the 16th c & Italy as the origin of chopines
here are clear references to Spanish chopines in the 15th c; you can
find one priest's c1485 diatribe  against them in Ruth Matilda
Anderson's book, Hispanic Dress.

What these 21st century chopines are is amusing; they are a
beautifully crafted homage to 16th style, but not a "reproduction".

I will now go console my double-laced, open-toed, velvet & tasseled
reproduction chopines and tell them how wonderful they truly are and
if I get to DC this winter, I will go have a look at the exhibit.
--cin
Cynthia Barnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


RE: [h-cost] "Walking Art," at the Italian Cultural Institute

2006-11-26 Thread Sharon at Collierfam.com
Don't know about "round heeled" referring to excessive walking-- I've heard
it was because a woman of easy virtue was easily pushed over, meaning she
had round heels instead of square ones which would tend to keep her from
tipping over.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ruth Anne Baumgartner
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2006 2:08 PM
To: Historical Costume
Subject: Re: [h-cost] "Walking Art," at the Italian Cultural Institute


Sounds interesting!
But the article's comment "The kings of France adopted high heels, as  
did the aristocracy, which explains why poor people who couldn't  
afford them were said to be "down at their heels." sounds fishy to  
me. My understanding (gleaned where? the mists of time  make source  
uncertain) was that people "down at the heel" walked their heels into  
nothing--and couldn't afford new shoes (or heels). So, Yes to poverty  
but No to an inability to afford high-heeled shoes to begin with
"Round-heeled" reported a similar phenomenon but due to excessive  
walking on the job--i.e., street-walker. This is a similar  
"understanding" of mine
Any corrections (or support) from people less dependent on fuzzy  
memories would be welcome!
--Ruth Anne Baumgartner
scholar gypsy and amateur costumer

On Nov 26, 2006, at 4:42 PM, lisa wrote:

> An article appeared in my local paper about this exhibit.
> http://tinyurl.com/ye4spw or http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/apps/ 
> pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061126/LIFE08/611260320/1076
>
> Has anyone seen the exhibit and if so, how was it?
>
> lisa
>
> ___
> h-costume mailing list
> h-costume@mail.indra.com
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] "Walking Art," at the Italian Cultural Institute

2006-11-26 Thread Ruth Anne Baumgartner

Sounds interesting!
But the article's comment "The kings of France adopted high heels, as  
did the aristocracy, which explains why poor people who couldn't  
afford them were said to be "down at their heels." sounds fishy to  
me. My understanding (gleaned where? the mists of time  make source  
uncertain) was that people "down at the heel" walked their heels into  
nothing--and couldn't afford new shoes (or heels). So, Yes to poverty  
but No to an inability to afford high-heeled shoes to begin with
"Round-heeled" reported a similar phenomenon but due to excessive  
walking on the job--i.e., street-walker. This is a similar  
"understanding" of mine
Any corrections (or support) from people less dependent on fuzzy  
memories would be welcome!

--Ruth Anne Baumgartner
scholar gypsy and amateur costumer

On Nov 26, 2006, at 4:42 PM, lisa wrote:


An article appeared in my local paper about this exhibit.
http://tinyurl.com/ye4spw or http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/apps/ 
pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061126/LIFE08/611260320/1076


Has anyone seen the exhibit and if so, how was it?

lisa

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


[h-cost] "Walking Art," at the Italian Cultural Institute

2006-11-26 Thread lisa

An article appeared in my local paper about this exhibit.
http://tinyurl.com/ye4spw or 
http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061126/LIFE08/611260320/1076


Has anyone seen the exhibit and if so, how was it?

lisa

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume