Re: [h-cost] split drawers

2011-09-15 Thread Beteena Paradise
Which is why I love the cage crinoline so much more than a regular crinoline. 
That doesn't happen. It folds nicely. :)  I bet they felt the same!

Teena



From: WorkroomButtons.com westvillagedrap...@yahoo.com
To: Historical Costume h-cost...@indra.com
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 3:06 AM
Subject: Re: [h-cost] split drawers

Ah... that makes perfect sense.  When she was not quite 12, my daughter 
was a jr. docent in a hoop skirt.  Let's just say sitting down, um... 
modestly was a challenge.  I had forgotten all about that experience!



Dede


--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Ann Catelli elvestoor...@yahoo.com wrote:

If you have a lampshade slightly loose on its harp, press down on one side.  
The other side goes Flying up.


The crinoline does the same thing, if not managed carefully.    

Even the most ladylike of persons might fall.
Drawers are definitely needed.
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] split drawers

2011-09-14 Thread WorkroomButtons.com
Okay, dumb question, but... why did they need drawers at all?  Chemise, layers 
of petticoats, and long skirts -- everything totally obscured, so why bother 
with drawers?

Dede O'Hair

--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Kim Baird kba...@cableone.net wrote:
Victorian women NEEDED split drawers. They wore a long chemise over the top
of the drawers, and a corset laced up tightly on top of that, so the only
way to drop a penny was to have the drawers split. You just couldn't get
at them to pull them down from the waist.
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] split drawers

2011-09-14 Thread Maggie Halberg
You'll find drawers starting to creep into women's clothing starting in the 
1840's and 50's.  They really really started to become common when women 
started to wear cage crinolines in the later 1850's.  With crinoline there were 
suddenly not as many layers right next to the body (nothing but the chemise and 
a single petticoat) and women probably started wearing them for modesty and 
comfort.  By the time the crinoline fell from fashion they had become typical 
and women just continued to wear them.

  Maggie Halberg

 

 


 

 

-Original Message-
From: WorkroomButtons.com westvillagedrap...@yahoo.com
To: Historical Costume h-cost...@indra.com
Sent: Wed, Sep 14, 2011 4:36 pm
Subject: Re: [h-cost] split drawers


Okay, dumb question, but... why did they need drawers at all?  Chemise, layers 
of petticoats, and long skirts -- everything totally obscured, so why bother 
with drawers?

Dede O'Hair

--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Kim Baird kba...@cableone.net wrote:
Victorian women NEEDED split drawers. They wore a long chemise over the top
of the drawers, and a corset laced up tightly on top of that, so the only
way to drop a penny was to have the drawers split. You just couldn't get
at them to pull them down from the waist.
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

 
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] split drawers

2011-09-14 Thread Joan Jurancich

At 12:59 PM 9/14/2011, you wrote:

Victorian women NEEDED split drawers. They wore a long chemise over the top
of the drawers, and a corset laced up tightly on top of that, so the only
way to drop a penny was to have the drawers split. You just couldn't get
at them to pull them down from the waist.

Kim


That's not necessarily so.  (Gentlemen, please delete this message, 
only the ladies should read it.)  When in my 1840s outfit for 
Sutter's Fort, I simply do not wear any bifurcated garments.  With 5 
layers (shift, 3 petticoats, and dress) between me and the outside 
world (and no inclination to do cartwheels), my modesty is safe.  I 
find split drawers to be very uncomfortable as they never fit 
properly and caused me to get badly chaffed.  So all I need to do is 
pick up all the layers and take care of business.  Of course, later 
in the 19th century fashions were different, but until the cage 
crinoline, drawers were not necessary for modesty.



Joan Jurancich
joa...@surewest.net 



___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] split drawers

2011-09-14 Thread otsisto
-Original Message-
At 12:59 PM 9/14/2011, you wrote:
Victorian women NEEDED split drawers. They wore a long chemise over the top
of the drawers, and a corset laced up tightly on top of that, so the only
way to drop a penny was to have the drawers split. You just couldn't get
at them to pull them down from the waist.

Kim

That's not necessarily so.  (Gentlemen, please delete this message,
only the ladies should read it.)  When in my 1840s outfit for
Sutter's Fort, I simply do not wear any bifurcated garments.  With 5
layers (shift, 3 petticoats, and dress) between me and the outside
world (and no inclination to do cartwheels), my modesty is safe.  I
find split drawers to be very uncomfortable as they never fit
properly and caused me to get badly chaffed.  So all I need to do is
pick up all the layers and take care of business.  Of course, later
in the 19th century fashions were different, but until the cage
crinoline, drawers were not necessary for modesty.
Joan Jurancich
joa...@surewest.net

I think she was saying accessability and not modesty. Your drawers is
sometime caught up in the corset making it difficut to drop the drawers. And
like corsets, if made right should fit comfortably.

De


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] split drawers

2011-09-14 Thread otsisto
You can find drawers in the late 1500s and forward. For the ladies with meat
on their thighs it is a chaffing matter. For most it is underwear.
De

-Original Message-
You'll find drawers starting to creep into women's clothing starting in the
1840's and 50's.  They really really started to become common when women
started to wear cage crinolines in the later 1850's.  With crinoline there
were suddenly not as many layers right next to the body (nothing but the
chemise and a single petticoat) and women probably started wearing them for
modesty and comfort.  By the time the crinoline fell from fashion they had
become typical and women just continued to wear them.

  Maggie Halberg










-Original Message-
From: WorkroomButtons.com westvillagedrap...@yahoo.com
To: Historical Costume h-cost...@indra.com
Sent: Wed, Sep 14, 2011 4:36 pm
Subject: Re: [h-cost] split drawers


Okay, dumb question, but... why did they need drawers at all?  Chemise,
layers
of petticoats, and long skirts -- everything totally obscured, so why bother
with drawers?

Dede O'Hair

--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Kim Baird kba...@cableone.net wrote:
Victorian women NEEDED split drawers. They wore a long chemise over the top
of the drawers, and a corset laced up tightly on top of that, so the only
way to drop a penny was to have the drawers split. You just couldn't get
at them to pull them down from the waist.
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume



___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] split drawers

2011-09-14 Thread Cactus
We should keep in mind that our definition of modesty would differ greatly from 
their definition of modesty.  Also, what we consider uncomfortable, because 
we don't do it / wear it all the time, was not necessarily uncomfortable to 
them, because they grew up dressing that way, there was no alternative.  I was 
in the train station the other day waiting for my train, and a woman came in 
wearing a cotton sundress, about 5-6 above her knees.  Her only undergarments 
(assuming here) were her knickers. Today she would be considered covered and 
decent, in the 1800s she would be considered nekked.  We can't help but apply 
our 21st century mindset to everything we do, even dressing 18th or 19th 
century or earlier.
 
Cactus
 
 
way to drop a penny was to have the drawers split. You just couldn't get
at them to pull them down from the waist.

Kim

That's not necessarily so.  When in my 1840s outfit for
Sutter's Fort, I simply do not wear any bifurcated garments.  With 5
layers (shift, 3 petticoats, and dress) between me and the outside
world (and no inclination to do cartwheels), my modesty is safe.  I
find split drawers to be very uncomfortable as they never fit
properly and caused me to get badly chaffed.  So all I need to do is
pick up all the layers and take care of business.  Joan Jurancich
joa...@surewest.net


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] split drawers

2011-09-14 Thread WorkroomButtons.com
Unfortunately, I now completely understand why wearing split drawers would be 
desirable.

Dede


--- On Wed, 9/14/11, otsisto otsi...@socket.net wrote:
For the ladies with meat
on their thighs it is a chaffing matter.
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] split drawers

2011-09-14 Thread Ann Catelli
Dear Dede--


If you have a lampshade slightly loose on its harp, press down on one side.  
The other side goes Flying up.

The crinoline does the same thing, if not managed carefully.    

Even the most ladylike of persons might fall.
Drawers are definitely needed.

Also, they were in fashion and had been coming into fashion since somewhere 
around 1800.


Trowsers (sic) may be found in the Workwoman's Guide (1840 edition online here: 
http://www.archive.org/details/workwomansguide00workgoog); my copy is after an 
1838 edition, as reprinted by Old Sturbridge Village, so some sort of 
bifurcated undergarment for women was being constructed at that point.  

This book is not aimed a fashion-forward women, but women trying to clothe 
their families or to make clothes as a charitable act.


Ann in CT



 why did they need drawers at all?  Chemise, layers of petticoats, and long 
 skirts -- everything totally obscured, so why
 bother with drawers?

 Dede O'Hair

--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Kim Baird kba...@cableone.net wrote:
Victorian women NEEDED split drawers. They wore a long chemise over the top
of the drawers, and a corset laced up tightly on top of that, so the only
way to drop a penny was to have the drawers split. You just couldn't get
at them to pull them down from the waist.
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] split drawers

2011-09-14 Thread WorkroomButtons.com
Ah... that makes perfect sense.  When she was not quite 12, my daughter 
was a jr. docent in a hoop skirt.  Let's just say sitting down, um... 
modestly was a challenge.  I had forgotten all about that experience!



Dede


--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Ann Catelli elvestoor...@yahoo.com wrote:

If you have a lampshade slightly loose on its harp, press down on one side.  
The other side goes Flying up.


The crinoline does the same thing, if not managed carefully.    

Even the most ladylike of persons might fall.
Drawers are definitely needed.
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume