[h2] Re: JRuby + Sinatra + H2 + ActiveRecord(Optional)

2015-02-04 Thread Max Lord
Hi Sheldon!

H2 is very well supported by the jruby activerecord-jdbc-adapter project.

https://github.com/jruby/activerecord-jdbc-adapter

You can use either active record or sequel as an ORM. The only caveat is 
that the jar version of H2 in jdbc-h2 is maybe not the best version to use. 
It might be better to build H2 and use a newer version.

Good luck,
Max

On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 3:42:27 PM UTC-5, Sheldon Hall wrote:

 Hi,

 Does anyone have an example of using an H2 database (in activerecord 
 pattern or not) with JRuby and Sinatra? Has anyone tried this before?
 Trying to find some example code but haven't really found anything 
 comprehensive. In addition it probably doesn't help that I'm new to most of 
 those
 technologies. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

 Regards,


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups H2 
Database group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to h2-database+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to h2-database@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [h2] 1.4 beta creates much bigger database file

2015-02-04 Thread Max Lord
I also had problems with an mvstore db growing out of control (about 3GB 
for 1M rows). I updated to 1.4.184, reimported, and it was much smaller 
(100MB). 

So the recent changes have had a very positive effect. 

Unfortunately, I was using 1.4.178 because that was the current jar bundled 
with the jdbc-h2 ruby gem. That version doesn't seem like such a good 
default. 

On Monday, February 2, 2015 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-5, Damien Coraboeuf wrote:

 I have replaced by BLOB columns by BINARY(32000) ones (more than enough in 
 our case). After exporting the database in SQL ('script' command), 
 recreating a blank database and reimporting the SQL ('runscript'), I went 
 from 1.7 Gb to 17 Mb.

 I'll monitor the database in the next days to see if the inflation starts 
 again.

 Damien.

 On Monday, 2 February 2015 17:40:49 UTC+1, Damien Coraboeuf wrote:

 Hi,

 Speaking of real world example - we are using H2 1.4.x to hold results 
 for a continuous delivery chain. With 1.4.177, our database was  600 Mb, 
 and after a 'shutdown defrag', we went down to... 11 Mb. We switched to 
 1.4.184 but now, the database has grown up to 1.7 Gb. That's a serious 
 issue for us :(

 The URL we use is:

 jdbc:h2:/opt/ontrack/database/data;MODE=MYSQL

 Damien.

 On Monday, 5 January 2015 18:15:56 UTC+1, Thomas Mueller wrote:

 Hi,

 OK, that's nice! There is still quite a lot of room for improvements, 
 and I don't consider this completely fixed, but will not work on it with 
 very high priority any longer.

 Regards,
 Thomas


 On Sunday, December 21, 2014, Steve McLeod steve@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Thomas,

 The database file size in 1.4.184 is much, much better than in earlier 
 1.4.x releases.

 I've done some trials and these are my findings:

 1.3.176: Fully loaded database after shutdown is 317 Mb
 1.4.184: Fully loaded database after shutdown is 380 Mb

 This seems reasonable.


 On Friday, 19 December 2014 17:15:29 UTC+8, Thomas Mueller wrote:

 Hi,

 Version 1.4.184 should produce smaller database files than previous 
 version (1.4.x - 1.4.182), maybe half or a third of the old file size. It 
 would be great to get some real-world results!

 Regards,
 Thomas



 On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Thomas Mueller thomas.to...@gmail.com
  wrote:

 Hi,

 Some initial results: you can shrink the database by running 
 shutdown compact or shutdown defrag. Each time this is run, it 
 shrinks 
 a few MB (up to some point, of course). This works, but it's relatively 
 slow. Now the task is to make it faster. There are two ways: shrink it 
 fully to the minimum size, and shrink it incrementally (like now) but 
 faster. I'm working on that now.

 Regards,
 Thomas



 On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Steve McLeod steve@gmail.com 
 wrote:

 Hi Thomas,

 I've sent you a private email with a link to the new database file, 
 made with H2 1.4.178

 Regards,

 Steve


 On Monday, 5 May 2014 07:46:16 UTC+2, Thomas Mueller wrote:

 Hi,

 The database file should shrink if you run shutdown defrag.

 The current compact algorithm is quite inefficient, that means the 
 databases file is quite big on average. The highest priority is still 
 to 
 ensure it always works correctly, and when that's done I will work on 
 more 
 efficiently re-using disk space and specially compact the file faster 
 when 
 closing the database.

 Could you send me the new database file? It would be nice to have a 
 real-world database file to test this. The last file you sent helped a 
 lot, 
 thanks to it I found some problems that completely prevented the file 
 to 
 shrink.

 Regards,
 Thomas



 On Sunday, May 4, 2014, Steve McLeod steve@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Thomas,

 I tested the same large data import with H2 1.4.178, and there is 
 no improvement over H2 1.4.177.

 Here are the file sizes, in both cases after the app has stopped:

 H2 1.3.176: pokercopilot.h2.db  301,669,352  bytes
 H2 1.4.178: pokercopilot.mv.db 1,023,037,440  bytes

 Let me know what I can do to help.

 Regards,

 Steve


 On Saturday, 19 April 2014 11:44:05 UTC+2, Steve McLeod wrote:

 Hi Thomas,

 Great! Glad I could help make your superb product even better.



 On Friday, 18 April 2014 21:38:27 UTC+2, Thomas Mueller wrote:

 Hi,

 Thanks a lot for the database! I know what the problem is now, but 
 I couldn't fix it yet. The database file (pokercopilot2.mv.db) has 
 about 
 181 MB of live data, the rest (about 78%) is not used. The 
 mechanism to 
 get rid of the unused space is not working as it should for this case 
 (I 
 think the problem is that b-tree nodes are not processed correctly). 
 This 
 will be fixed in the next release.

 Regards,
 Thomas


 On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Steve McLeod steve@gmail.com
  wrote:

 Hi Thomas,

 I've sent a link to file privately to your email address.

 Regards,

 Steve



 On Friday, 18 April 2014 14:04:37 UTC+2, Thomas Mueller wrote:

 Hi,

 Hm, that didn't help much. Could you send me the (compressed) 
 database files please?