Re: [hackers] [st][PATCH] Fixed 'missing glyph doesn't use fontconfig config substitutions' bug
> I basically just copied the guts out of XftFontMatch[1] and saved > the intermediate configured FcPattern. Could be related to the bug that > inspired commit 4242027. > Ok, your patch seems correct, but I would like to know if your patch solves the issue of the commit 4242027, because in this case we can remove the changes of that commit, which are a bit ugly. Can you verify it? Regards,
Re: [hackers] [st][PATCH] Fixed 'missing glyph doesn't use fontconfig config substitutions' bug
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:05:55PM +0100, k...@shike2.com wrote: > Ok, your patch seems correct, but I would like to know if your patch solves > the issue of the commit 4242027, because in this case we can remove the > changes of that commit, which are a bit ugly. Can you verify it? I reverted 4242027, applied this patch, and it does indeed fix the problem for me. -- - Ian.
