Re: [hackers] Re: [ubase] [PATCH] Include sys/sysmacros.h when major is not defined in sys/types.h
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 08:01:18AM +0100, Laslo Hunhold wrote: > Dimitris is the current maintainer, so you will have to talk to him, > but I'd say that nothing speaks against you maintaining it. I always > saw sbase and ubase to be siblings, so given you already maintain > sbase, it would make a lot of sense. :) He is in the mailing list, but I think he usually doesn't read it. Maybe a direct mail is better. Regards,
Re: [hackers] Re: [ubase] [PATCH] Include sys/sysmacros.h when major is not defined in sys/types.h
On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 12:13:11 -0700 Michael Forney wrote: Dear Michael, > On 2019-08-10, Michael Forney wrote: > > This fixes the build with glibc >= 2.28 and musl >= 1.1.23. > > Ping. Anyone still care about ubase? There are a few patches pending > on the list. > > If nobody else is interested, I can start maintaining ubase. Dimitris is the current maintainer, so you will have to talk to him, but I'd say that nothing speaks against you maintaining it. I always saw sbase and ubase to be siblings, so given you already maintain sbase, it would make a lot of sense. :) With best regards Laslo pgpmkP3DeDOO1.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[hackers] Re: [ubase] [PATCH] Include sys/sysmacros.h when major is not defined in sys/types.h
On 2019-08-10, Michael Forney wrote: > This fixes the build with glibc >= 2.28 and musl >= 1.1.23. Ping. Anyone still care about ubase? There are a few patches pending on the list. If nobody else is interested, I can start maintaining ubase.
