Re: [hackers] [sbase] [patch] ed: Treat addresses of 0 as 1 for insert

2017-01-02 Thread Laslo Hunhold 
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 09:33:15 -0800
Evan Gates  wrote:

Hey Evan,

> POSIX says: "Address 0 shall be valid for this command; it shall be
> interpreted as if address 1 were specified."

I checked the standard. Thanks, applied!

Cheers

Laslo

-- 
Laslo Hunhold

Re: [hackers] [sbase] [patch] ed: Treat addresses of 0 as 1 for insert

2016-12-27 Thread Evan Gates 
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Laslo Hunhold  wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 15:19:35 +
> Thomas Mannay  wrote:
>
> Hey Thomas,
>
>> From 6665eaa1d2c25a95b44a4f4fb3d24a3bd5c1180f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Thomas Mannay 
>> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 15:16:32 +
>> Subject: [PATCH] Treat addresses of 0 as 1 for insert
>
> this patch looks logical to me, but what do the others say?
>
> Cheers
>
> Laslo
>
> --
> Laslo Hunhold 
>

POSIX says: "Address 0 shall be valid for this command; it shall be
interpreted as if address 1 were specified."

Re: [hackers] [sbase] [patch] ed: Treat addresses of 0 as 1 for insert

2016-12-27 Thread Laslo Hunhold 
On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 15:19:35 +
Thomas Mannay  wrote:

Hey Thomas,

> From 6665eaa1d2c25a95b44a4f4fb3d24a3bd5c1180f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Thomas Mannay 
> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 15:16:32 +
> Subject: [PATCH] Treat addresses of 0 as 1 for insert

this patch looks logical to me, but what do the others say?

Cheers

Laslo

-- 
Laslo Hunhold