In W3C CSS Working Group, there is a discussion[1] on providing "longhand" (as opposed to "shorthand") for the "transform" property, such as "transform-rotate" etc.. The use case is to shorten:
#demo { transform: scale(2); } #demo.state-1 { transform: scale(2) rotate(45deg); } #demo.state-2 { transform: scale(2) rotate(90deg); } into #demo { transform: scale(2); } #demo.state-1 { transform-rotate: 45deg; } #demo.state-2 { transform-rotate: 90deg; } As there's technical problem for browser to support this, I am wondering how SASS addresses a use csae like this (I myself is not familiar with SASS). Would it be a good idea to have a new syntax (like the "+transform" idea[2])? As some important features of SASS might become CSS modules known as CSS Variables and CSS Mixin[3], I think it would be nice to know what the SASS community thinks about this use case. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/thread#msg564 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0677 [3] http://www.xanthir.com/blog/b4Av0 Cheers, Kenny -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to haml@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to haml+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.