Re: [Hampshire] DAT as a backup medium

2017-04-23 Thread Keith Edmunds via Hampshire
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:55:27 +0100, hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk said:

> Is DAT still a viable backup medium if you want USB and to avoid optical
> disks?

What is the reason for the backups? (Yes, that's a serious question).

-- 
"I won't insult your intelligence by suggesting you really believe what
you just said" - Willam F Buckely jr


-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--

Re: [Hampshire] DAT as a backup medium

2017-04-23 Thread Gordon Scott via Hampshire



On 22/04/17 12:37, Rob Malpass via Hampshire wrote:
I find it amazing hdd technology (which we’ve has since the 70s) is 
still the medium of preference.


To a significant extent it's _because_ they've been around since the 70s.

They've been undergoing fairly continuous evolution since then ... 
better materials, better manufacturing techniques, better balance and 
resilience of the components and so on. Totally hermetically sealed, 
auto-parking, etc.


I used to use tape, but it isn't actually all _that_ reliable.  It 
_isn't_ hermetically sealed, so it's at greater risk from environmental 
factors like humidity and pollution, tape has always been prone to 
stretch, I presume(!) that there's still contact between head and tape 
(in HDDs the head 'flies' microns above the medium).


SSD may(!) be more reliable, but it's much more expensive.
I gave up tape when it became more expensive than HDDs.
So far, I personally have seen no reason to return.
YMMV.

Gordon.

--
Gordon Scott
http://www.gscott.co.uk

*Rescue Tally Ho*
http://www.yachttallyho.com
https://www.facebook.com/yachtTallyHo

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--