Re: [Hampshire] An excellent description of Windows Mobile

2009-07-31 Thread Timothy Brocklehurst
I've had colleagues with Windows-based smart phones, blackberries and 
I-phones. Personally I prefer the I-phone (oooh, Tim being pro-Apple... how 
often does that happen?) from a set-up point of view, and those who have had 
them seem very happy with them.

The gripe I have with Blackberries (which I presume is the plural of 
Blackberry), other than a questionable choice on the touch-screen with 
certain models, is the web-based setup procedure. Not a major concern, just 
not the way I'd want to set it up.

My colleague with the windows smart phone got rid of it some time ago, as it 
would occasionally crash during calls, holding the GPRS line connected, and 
consequently costing a not insignificant amount of money over a month.

I try not to Microsoft-bash for the sake of it, and I try to keep an open mind 
about their new products, but you must admit, they do produce some grade A 
s**t at times.

Incidentally, all three listed can connect to both Exchange and IMAP.

Cheers,

Tim B.

On Friday 31 July 2009 08:43:48 Samuel Penn wrote:
 On Friday 31 July 2009 07:22:38 Stephen Davies wrote:
  http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/07/30/microsoft_mobile_bach/comments/
 
  Warning, reading this may require you to clean your keyboard  screen.
 
  couple with the release of the HTC Hero in the UK (hint, runs Android)
  http://www.mobilefun.co.uk/sim-free-htc-hero-white-p20549.htm?referer=N20
 09 0730_Extinct_Name-toptextHTCHeroAccessories
 
  I can see the writing on the wall for Windows Mobile unless some serious
  $$$ can persuade makers otherwise.

 Some friends of mine have Windows mobiles, and they're great.
 Nice hardware, and the software seems to work just fine. Being
 able to just connect into the company's Exchange server to
 access contacts, calendar and email whilst on the move is what
 I'd consider a killer feature as far as business users are
 concerned.

 Don't make the mistake of underestimating Microsoft just because
 you don't like them.

 --
 Be seeing you, http://www.glendale.org.uk
 Sam.Mail/IM (Jabber): s...@glendale.org.uk



-- 
OpenPilot - Open-source Marine Chart Plotter
Lead Developer
http://openpilot.sourceforge.net

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] An excellent description of Windows Mobile

2009-07-31 Thread trotter
At 21:29 31/07/2009, you wrote:
I've had colleagues with Windows-based smart phones, blackberries and
I-phones. Personally I prefer the I-phone (oooh, Tim being pro-Apple... how
often does that happen?) from a set-up point of view, and those who have had
them seem very happy with them.

The gripe I have with Blackberries (which I presume is the plural of
Blackberry), other than a questionable choice on the touch-screen with
certain models, is the web-based setup procedure. Not a major concern, just
not the way I'd want to set it up.

My colleague with the windows smart phone got rid of it some time ago, as it
would occasionally crash during calls, holding the GPRS line connected, and
consequently costing a not insignificant amount of money over a month.

I try not to Microsoft-bash for the sake of it, and I try to keep an 
open mind
about their new products, but you must admit, they do produce some grade A
s**t at times.

Incidentally, all three listed can connect to both Exchange and IMAP.


There is the older palm classic range like the Treo however there is now the
palm Pre thats getting good reviews in the US.
Will be in uk around Sept/Oct.

 From what i can tell from ex palm users it seems win mob offers more 
of the flexibility
and the amount of applications that the palm does than blackberry or iphone.

Martin N


Owner of the bwfc yahoogroup and Co-Moderator of  MiniDisc and 
amithlonopen yahoo groups. 


-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] An excellent description of Windows Mobile

2009-07-31 Thread John Cooper
Samuel Penn wrote:
 On Friday 31 July 2009 07:22:38 Stephen Davies wrote:
 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/07/30/microsoft_mobile_bach/comments/

 Warning, reading this may require you to clean your keyboard  screen.

 couple with the release of the HTC Hero in the UK (hint, runs Android)
 http://www.mobilefun.co.uk/sim-free-htc-hero-white-p20549.htm?referer=N2009
 0730_Extinct_Name-toptextHTCHeroAccessories

 I can see the writing on the wall for Windows Mobile unless some serious
 $$$ can persuade makers otherwise.
 
 Some friends of mine have Windows mobiles, and they're great.
 Nice hardware, and the software seems to work just fine. Being
 able to just connect into the company's Exchange server to
 access contacts, calendar and email whilst on the move is what
 I'd consider a killer feature as far as business users are
 concerned.
 
 Don't make the mistake of underestimating Microsoft just because
 you don't like them.
 
Windows mobile has nothing in common with MS Windows other than I think
they are both poorly coded, buggy and virus prone. Whereas something
like Android is Linux, just like any distro such as Ubuntu runs on and
are excellent, secure, innovative and community driven. HTC magic and
hero are real M$ mobile killers, even better than Nokia. Google
understand technology and don't need abusive monopolistic practices to
keep their market share. You are so old school thinking M$ can carry on
abusing its market share. Don't underestimate Google just because you
only know M$!

John.

-- 
--
Discover Linux - Open Source Solutions to Business and Schools
http://discoverlinux.co.uk
--

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] An excellent description of Windows Mobile

2009-07-31 Thread James Ashburner
Timothy Brocklehurst wrote:
 The gripe I have with Blackberries (which I presume is the plural of 
 Blackberry), other than a questionable choice on the touch-screen with 
 certain models, is the web-based setup procedure. Not a major concern, just 
 not the way I'd want to set it up.
   
I look after all the BlackBerries at work and they're all activated via 
USB, though they can be activated remotely if necessary.

James

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--