Re: [PATCH] BUILD: ssl: Build with new cryptographic library AWS-LC

2023-09-04 Thread William Lallemand
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 01:25:55AM +, Hopkins, Andrew wrote:
> Hi,

Hi Andrew!

> I have what I think it approaching the final 3 patches attached. I
> cleaned up the first patch so it just includes the code, makefile, and
> documentation changes to support AWS-LC. The second patch disables the
> one FFDH test when HAPRoxy is build with AWS-LC.

I merged these two ones which are fine.

> Finally, the third patch does a few things: 

> 1.  Add support to matrix.py to find the latest release of AWS-LC, it
> would be a one line change to add AWS-LC to build on every push in
> matrix.py in the future 

> 2. Update matrix.py to have a main function,
> this looks like a big change but is all whitespace. I did this because
> I needed a way to get the latest version in aws-lc.yml. I did that by
> invoking the determine_latest_aws_lc function in the GitHub action,
> I'm open to other suggestions

> 3. Add a weekly build of HAProxy with
> the latest release of AWS-LC with the same schedule as the other
> weekly jobs: Thursdays at 00:00
> 

Seems like you just list what could be 3 differents patches in my
opinion. :-) Also this could have been your commit message too!

I didn't merged this one, there is a lot going on in there. It would be
better to split them for better readibility. We encourage to write micro
commits with only one feature per patch.

I'm fine with the final result though, but could you split it in 3
patches? Thanks


> You can see an example of the run here [1]. Also, I discovered you can
> add `workflow_dispatch` to scheduled tasks so you can manually trigger
> them without having to tweak the cron schedule.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/andrewhop/haproxy/actions/runs/6044112377
> 

That's great, that will be useful this way!

Thanks

-- 
William Lallemand



Re: [PATCH] MINOR: properly mark the end of the CLI command in error messages

2023-09-04 Thread William Lallemand
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 10:05:11AM +0200, Miroslav Zagorac wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> this is a patch related to correctly marking the end of the CLI command in the
> error message in several places in the file src/ssl_ckch.c .
> 

Thanks, merged.


-- 
William Lallemand



[PR] BUG/MEDIUM: h1-htx: Ensure chunked parsing with full output buffer

2023-09-04 Thread PR Bot
Dear list!

Author: Chris Staite 
Number of patches: 1

This is an automated relay of the Github pull request:
   BUG/MEDIUM: h1-htx: Ensure chunked parsing with full output buffer

Patch title(s): 
   BUG/MEDIUM: h1-htx: Ensure chunked parsing with full output buffer

Link:
   https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/2278

Edit locally:
   wget https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/2278.patch && vi 2278.patch

Apply locally:
   curl https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/2278.patch | git am -

Description:
   A previous fix to ensure that there is sufficient space on the output
   buffer to place parsed data (#2053) introduced an issue that if the
   output buffer is filled on a chunk boundary no data is parsed but the
   congested flag is not set due to the state not being H1_MSG_DATA.
   The check to ensure that there is sufficient space in the output
   buffer is actually already performed in all downstream functions
   before it is used. This makes the early optimisation that avoids the
   state transition to H1_MSG_DATA needless.  Therefore, in order to
   allow the chunk parser to continue in this edge case we can simply
   remove the early check.  This ensures that the state can progress and
   set the congested flag correctly in the caller.
   
   This patch
   fixes #2262. The upstream change that caused this logic error was
   backported as far as 2.5, therefore it makes sense to backport this
   fix back that far also.

Instructions:
   This github pull request will be closed automatically; patch should be
   reviewed on the haproxy mailing list (haproxy@formilux.org). Everyone is
   invited to comment, even the patch's author. Please keep the author and
   list CCed in replies. Please note that in absence of any response this
   pull request will be lost.