Re: License questions
Am 20.05.2016 16:12 schrieb Aleksandar Lazic: Maybe off topic and just for my curiosity 'why'. Lazy developers. Oh so shiny to get client-ip and other info "for free" from the ajp-listener/container. Next to any jboss/tomcat app I get on the table "suffers" from this. There are one/some that added ajp to nginx - and it's a major pain. We have faced a lot of problems with ajp with jboss & tomcat after switching to http(s) most of the issues was gone, jfyi ;-). Beloved ajp ping/pong exhausting the container? :) Oh - please DO NOT add AJP to haproxy :-) ciao -- pb
Re: License questions
Hi Jonathan. Am 20-05-2016 16:05, schrieb Jonathan Fisher: Hey guys, Reading through the license, I had a couple of questions. HAProxy does not speak AJP, which is not terrible, but I was thinking about implementing a module for it. Maybe off topic and just for my curiosity 'why'. I have also thought to add this protocol to haproxy but due to the fact that almost all server speaks also http(s) I don't see any benefit with ajp. This thought matches also fcgi, from my point of view. We have faced a lot of problems with ajp with jboss & tomcat after switching to http(s) most of the issues was gone, jfyi ;-). Cheers Aleks If I did, I would want the license to be ASL. If I pull in the development headers from HAProxy, would that present a license conflict? -- JONATHAN S. FISHER Senior Software Engineer https://twitter.com/exabrial http://www.tomitribe.com https://www.tomitribe.io
License questions
Hey guys, Reading through the license, I had a couple of questions. HAProxy does not speak AJP, which is not terrible, but I was thinking about implementing a module for it. If I did, I would want the license to be ASL. If I pull in the development headers from HAProxy, would that present a license conflict? -- *Jonathan S. Fisher* Senior Software Engineer https://twitter.com/exabrial http://www.tomitribe.com https://www.tomitribe.io
