Re: [H] trying to setup a second WAP

2007-01-07 Thread Steve
Although they are called routers I suspect they are not proper routers so 
the 1st device may not be able to route to a second internal subnet, even if 
you have been able to configure it in some way.


Try giving the 2nd device an address like 192.168.1.100 and see what 
happens.


Check the arp table on the 1st device to see what appears in there - you 
should see the mac address of the 2nd device plus it's IP address.


- Original Message - 
From: Chris Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: 'The Hardware List' hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 7:46 AM
Subject: FW: [H] trying to setup a second WAP




It actually appears to be working now.  The first Linksys is giving out a
192.168.1.x IP address, and I can get to the internet.  I can open up the
config properties for the first router(192.168.1.1.  However, I can't 
reach
the 192.168.2.1 router to make config changes.  Are you able to reach 
yours?



Thanks again,

Chris




--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.410 / Virus Database: 268.16.6/617 - Release Date: 05/01/2007 
11:11







RE: [H] trying to setup a second WAP

2007-01-07 Thread Chris Klein
Everything at this point is working fine, except I can't get to the
192.168.2.1 address.  I guess it's not *that* big of a deal.  I can create a
static route in the first router, however, nothing appears to work no matter
what I put in.  I can't ping from the 192.168.1.1 router to the 192.168.2.1
router.  I don't know if it's feasible at all at this point.  There is no
mention anywhere of router2, in router1.  Unless it's some config/file
somewhere that I don't have access to.  



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 3:34 AM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] trying to setup a second WAP

Although they are called routers I suspect they are not proper routers so 
the 1st device may not be able to route to a second internal subnet, even if

you have been able to configure it in some way.

Try giving the 2nd device an address like 192.168.1.100 and see what 
happens.

Check the arp table on the 1st device to see what appears in there - you 
should see the mac address of the 2nd device plus it's IP address.

- Original Message - 
From: Chris Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'The Hardware List' hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 7:46 AM
Subject: FW: [H] trying to setup a second WAP



 It actually appears to be working now.  The first Linksys is giving out a
 192.168.1.x IP address, and I can get to the internet.  I can open up the
 config properties for the first router(192.168.1.1.  However, I can't 
 reach
 the 192.168.2.1 router to make config changes.  Are you able to reach 
 yours?


 Thanks again,

 Chris




 -- 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.410 / Virus Database: 268.16.6/617 - Release Date: 05/01/2007

 11:11

 



Re: [H] trying to setup a second WAP

2007-01-07 Thread JOEUSER
Hello Chris,

Sunday, January 7, 2007, 12:16:45 AM, you wrote:

 I have a WRT54G connected to my cable modem.  It provides WPA2 Wireless G
 access to several devices in my apartment, along with a cat 5 connection to
 my main computer.

Something you may want to check into (super-charge your LinkSys)

http://www.sveasoft.com/


-- 
Regards,
 joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...



Re: [H] trying to setup a second WAP

2007-01-07 Thread j maccraw
More like super-lame. They got $40 from me, not a
dime more, too many 
problems with Talisman.

I've switched to DD-WRT and have had no headaches
since.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DD-WRT
http://www.dd-wrt.com/

JOEUSER wrote:
 Hello Chris,
 
 Sunday, January 7, 2007, 12:16:45 AM, you wrote:
 
 I have a WRT54G connected to my cable modem.  It
provides WPA2 Wireless G
 access to several devices in my apartment, along
with a cat 5 connection to
 my main computer.
 
 Something you may want to check into (super-charge
your LinkSys)
 
 http://www.sveasoft.com/
 
 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


Re: FW: [H] trying to setup a second WAP

2007-01-07 Thread j maccraw
I would assume the firewall on the slaved router would
filter the IANA 
subnet, but if it's getting IANA IP via DHCP though
it's WAN port from 
LAN port of master router then you'd think it would
just work.

Say that 3 time fast!

Also, I'd put the GS on the border with DD-WRT before
I'd put the older 
G version there. I'd definitely run DD-WRT on both
though with the 
internal slave running a static IP from the master's
subnet  leave 
slave's DHCP running serving a second subnet for it's
wireless clients.

Of course, here I would disable both DHCP servers
since I run a Win2K DC 
hosting DHCP  DNS which work together keeping my
local domain DNS straight.


Chris Klein wrote:
 H...didn't think about that.  And all of my
devices will get an IP
 address assigned to them from the first/main router,
correct?  I won't
 really have any devices plugged into the second one,
it's mainly just for
 wireless.
 
 
 I just tired it and it's not working.  Do you have
Linksys products at your
 house?  If so I have some specific
questions...nothing I try is working
 
 -Original Message-
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gary VanderMolen
 
 You need to plug the cable from the WRT54G into a
LAN (not WAN)
 port on the secondary router. I have a similar setup
in my house.
 In essence that turns the WRT54GS into a switch
rather than a router.


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


[H] Difference between MacBook and Pro?

2007-01-07 Thread Brian Weeden

Finally going to get one and trying to figure out where the
differences are.  All I can see so far is 2.0 vs 2.33 Core2 Duo and
and a double-layer SuperDrive.  Anything else I am missing?

--
Brian


Re: [H] Difference between MacBook and Pro?

2007-01-07 Thread tmservo
That's it. 

Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless  

-Original Message-
From: Brian Weeden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:40:01 
To:hwg hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] Difference between MacBook and Pro?

Finally going to get one and trying to figure out where the
differences are.  All I can see so far is 2.0 vs 2.33 Core2 Duo and
and a double-layer SuperDrive.  Anything else I am missing?

-- 
Brian



Re: [H] Consumer reports smokes crack

2007-01-07 Thread j maccraw
Ok, I'll revisit this one last time. From experience,
these options are 
necessities. Not in the sense that the laptop stops
functioning but in 
the sense that it becomes hard to use the laptop in
both home  mobile 
uses with major hassles  money loss.

Until I got a spare PSU I'd find myself either willing
to chance dying 
mobile rather than get on the floor under my desk 
unplug the it 
because it was a bitch to get out and to put back
later.

Batteries may last longer per-charge today, but they
have a longer 
overall lifetime if used in pairs because you can run
them same as 
single w/o deep-cycling them thus preventing premature
wear out.

Mouse I would concede with the poke of let's see you
use a trackpad for 
more than 15 minutes. They are a real PITA but OK, you
could go without 
lugging a usb mouse.

Sometimes optimal vs. unnecessary is defined not by
absolutes but by 
mitigating factors of everyday life.


Greg Sevart wrote:
 You're arguing that a laptop is essentially unusable
in a mobile capacity
 without a spare battery, spare power adapter, and
USB mouse? Funny, our
 salespeople do it all the time. With current models
hitting 5+ hours of
 battery life, none of those are -essential-.
 
 Yes, it is a minor point that we've spent too much
time on. Most people just
 have a really absurd view of what is
needed/necessary and what is
 optimal/nice-to-have.
 
 
 Greg
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:hardware-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of j maccraw
 Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 6:50 AM
 To: The Hardware List
 Subject: Re: [H] Consumer reports smokes crack

 Laptop implies mobile, which makes all of those
 absolutely necessary.
 Whatever, too much thought on too small a problem
T.


 Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
 Perhaps the reviewer considers those items to be
 essential to a
 serious laptop user. For example, if you travel
and
 use a laptop
 exclusively...they might be essential.

 Thane Sherrington wrote:
 At 07:58 AM 03/01/2007, j maccraw wrote:
 Certainly they are essential!
 Dictionary.com disagrees:
 es.sen.tial
 -adjective
 1. absolutely necessary; indispensable:
Discipline
 is essential in an
 army.

 The laptop would function fine without any of
 these. That makes them
 non-essential. Very nice to have, perhaps.
 Extremely useful. But not
 essential.

 T



 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
 http://mail.yahoo.com
 
 
 
 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


Re: [H] Here comes the terabyte hard drive

2007-01-07 Thread j maccraw
Downloaded content like music  video comes to mind.
Backup will be #2 
use for Blue-ray or HDDVD burners when the become
cheap enough.

Certainly not often or even in frequent 1 shot full
backup situation, 
but needs some degree of backup none the less. If my
100GB+ of Mp3's 
died I'd loose both time  money replacing them if not
for some degree 
of backups. So I incremental backup to DVD-R every few
months, full once 
a year or so.

In a few years households will have multi-TB NAS
setups (likely with 
built in high capacity discs burners or removable /or
spare HDD's for 
backups) simply because files is how all content is
going to end up 
and inaccessibility will be king. MP3  Video's like
TV shows/movies 
which are just easier to enjoy when stored centrally
and accessed from 
menus rather than digging out a CD or DVD disc.

Storage is cheap, buy a few 1TB drives, use one for
main storage, 
another for online backups, a 3rd for offline backups,
etc...

Greg Sevart wrote:
 Is there really 1.0TB of home user data that needs
to be backed up? I run
 nightly backups on my machine. Out of over 4TB,
there's only about 15GB that
 I consider essential enough to back up.
 
 On the commercial side, the problem already exists
with storage arrays of
 multiple TB or more. High-dollar LTO-3 autoloaders
can resolve the backup
 situation there.
 
 Greg
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:hardware-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dhs
 Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 4:56 PM
 To: The Hardware List
 Subject: Re: [H] Here comes the terabyte hard drive


 Nice news! But, has anybody thought about backup
apps for HD's this big?
 If I had a drive of 1TB, it would take me about a
week to do a backup with
 a
 dual P3-1Gz server!! LOL!!

 I'll wait for Seagate, although I've had very good
service from the
 Hitachi replacement
 drives in my server.  I do like the 7Kx series of
HDs from Hitachi.
 Maybe 'old' IBM drives, but, they are still very
strong HDs.
 Best,
 Duncan

 On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:36 , Winterlight
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 sent:

http://news.com.com/Here+comes+the+terabyte+hard+drive/2100-1041-
 6147409.html?part=dhttag=nl.e703
 Last year, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies
predicted hard-drive
 companies would announce 1 terabyte drives by the
end of 2006.
 Hitachi was only off by a few days.

 The company said on Thursday that it will come out
with a
 3.5-inch-diameter 1 terabyte drive for desktops in
the first quarter,
 then follow up in the second quarter with 3.5-inch
terabyte drives
 for digital video recorders, bundled with software
called
 Audio-Visual Storage Manager for easier retrieval
of data, and
 corporate storage systems.

 The Deskstar 7K1000 will cost $399 when it comes
out. That comes to
 about 40 cents a gigabyte. Hitachi will also come
out with a similar
 750GB drive. Rival Seagate Technology will come
out with a 1 terabyte
 drive in the first half of 2007.





 This email scanned for Viruses and Spam by
ZCloud.net
 
 
 
 
 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


Re: [H] Consumer reports smokes crack

2007-01-07 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 04:50 PM 07/01/2007, j maccraw wrote:

Ok, I'll revisit this one last time. From experience,
these options are
necessities. Not in the sense that the laptop stops
functioning but in
the sense that it becomes hard to use the laptop in
both home  mobile
uses with major hassles  money loss.


I've been using laptop for slightly over two years with a single 
battery, power adapter, and touchpad.  I do a lot of work, and this 
configuration has never let me down.  Now I can imagine situations 
where these additions would be a necessity, but they are very 
specific and generally unusual (from the Consumer Reports average 
reader's standpoint.)  So yes, you have a point that in very specific 
situations these extras become essential but if one is going to do 
that, then the sky's the limit.  Consumer Reports is a magazine aimed 
at the average casual buyer - not the hard core user, who already 
knows what he needs.  So in this case they are wrong and they are 
misleading their subscribers.


T 


Re: [H] Consumer reports smokes crack

2007-01-07 Thread Anthony Q. Martin



Thane Sherrington wrote:

At 04:50 PM 07/01/2007, j maccraw wrote:

Ok, I'll revisit this one last time. From experience,
these options are
necessities. Not in the sense that the laptop stops
functioning but in
the sense that it becomes hard to use the laptop in
both home  mobile
uses with major hassles  money loss.


I've been using laptop for slightly over two years with a single 
battery, power adapter, and touchpad.  I do a lot of work, and this 
configuration has never let me down.  Now I can imagine situations 
where these additions would be a necessity, but they are very specific 
and generally unusual (from the Consumer Reports average reader's 
standpoint.)  So yes, you have a point that in very specific 
situations these extras become essential but if one is going to do 
that, then the sky's the limit.  Consumer Reports is a magazine aimed 
at the average casual buyer - not the hard core user, who already 
knows what he needs.  So in this case they are wrong and they are 
misleading their subscribers.


T


1) you cannot assume that because you use your LT a lot that you use it 
the same way as others who travel a lot do. Do you travel a lot?  Your 
needs are dictated by not only how much you use it but also by how you 
use it and how you PREFER to use it.  I think the reviewer simply has 
different notions or sensibilities than you do.


2) Consumer Reports is targeted to the consumerand some of those 
consumers may not be so average in all ways.  Some may look to CR to 
save time. The term essential as used in the article is just a typical 
misuse of a wordbut this is commonly done in language to day. I 
consider, in this case, essential to mean recommend or something to 
consider strongly. I think way too much is being made of this point.


Re: [H] Consumer reports smokes crack

2007-01-07 Thread Anthony Q. Martin




I've been using laptop for slightly over two years with a single 
battery, power adapter, and touchpad.  I do a lot of work, and this 
configuration has never let me down.  Now I can imagine situations 
where these additions would be a necessity, but they are very specific 
and generally unusual (from the Consumer Reports average reader's 
standpoint.)  So yes, you have a point that in very specific 
situations these extras become essential but if one is going to do 
that, then the sky's the limit.  Consumer Reports is a magazine aimed 
at the average casual buyer - not the hard core user, who already 
knows what he needs.  So in this case they are wrong and they are 
misleading their subscribers.




I just spent the last several minutes on consumerreports.org looking 
over their comments on laptop. I saw several pages of fairly decent 
comments on laptop. I no way would one get the impression that they are 
misleading anyone.  Overall, it seems to be fairly balanced and 
non-remarkable coverage.




Re: [H] trying to setup a second WAP

2007-01-07 Thread Gary VanderMolen
In order to see both routers (and modem) config screens,
I had to set the subnet mask of the first router to 255.255.0.0.

Gary VanderMolen


- Original Message - 
From: Chris Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'The Hardware List' hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 11:46 PM
Subject: FW: [H] trying to setup a second WAP


 
 It actually appears to be working now.  The first Linksys is giving out a
 192.168.1.x IP address, and I can get to the internet.  I can open up the
 config properties for the first router(192.168.1.1.  However, I can't reach
 the 192.168.2.1 router to make config changes.  Are you able to reach yours?



Re: [H] Consumer reports smokes crack

2007-01-07 Thread j maccraw
Considering many of the corps. I've deal with sent
their people out with 
batteries that hold no charge there are extremes at
both ends where you 
could still call it functional.

By my own admission functionality was lost as I would
gamble (and had it 
bite me a few times) rather than hassle with getting
at my PSU. Yet not 
so much by not having a mouse with me. Batteries I
stand fast on 
advising running in pairs as in your nuts if you
don't, but you can run 
with one.

I agree the problem is the word being used and
splitting hairs over it 
rather than seeing it for what it should be which is
strongly 
recommended as has been suggested.

Greg Sevart wrote:
 Can you not recognize that you are the exception,
not the norm? MOST users
 do not need a spare battery or PSU. Even our
salespeople, who do travel
 frequently, do not have these extras...and they do
just fine. Believe me, if
 they requested them, they would get them.
 
 You really make my point, though. Essential in this
context implies required
 to perform a job. By your own admission,
functionality is not lost; they
 merely make things easier and save some time---a
definitive nice-to-have.
 
 Greg
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:hardware-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of j maccraw
 Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 2:50 PM
 To: The Hardware List
 Subject: Re: [H] Consumer reports smokes crack

 Ok, I'll revisit this one last time. From
experience,
 these options are
 necessities. Not in the sense that the laptop stops
 functioning but in
 the sense that it becomes hard to use the laptop in
 both home  mobile
 uses with major hassles  money loss.

 
 
 
 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


Re: [H] trying to setup a second WAP

2007-01-07 Thread j maccraw
Likely then what you need is 255.255.252.0 mask if the
slave is 
192.168.2.1  master 192.168.1.1.

If their same subnet, then you have a kludge by
ignoring some of the 
network bits.



Gary VanderMolen wrote:
 In order to see both routers (and modem) config
screens,
 I had to set the subnet mask of the first router to
255.255.0.0.
 
 Gary VanderMolen
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Chris Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'The Hardware List'
hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 11:46 PM
 Subject: FW: [H] trying to setup a second WAP
 
 
 It actually appears to be working now.  The first
Linksys is giving out a
 192.168.1.x IP address, and I can get to the
internet.  I can open up the
 config properties for the first router(192.168.1.1.
 However, I can't reach
 the 192.168.2.1 router to make config changes.  Are
you able to reach yours?
 
 
 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


RE: [H] Pentium-M desktop motherboard

2007-01-07 Thread Greg Sevart
I think you mean Pentium 4-M...there are no P-M's at 3.06GHz.

Greg

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Ruset
 Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 9:29 PM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: [H] Pentium-M desktop motherboard
 
 Anybody know of a desktop motherboard that will accept a Pentium-M
 processor? I yanked a 3.06ghz Pentium-M from a dead Dell and would like
 to use it in some sort of desktop system.




Re: [H] Pentium-M desktop motherboard

2007-01-07 Thread Ben Ruset

Yes, sorry.

Greg Sevart wrote:

I think you mean Pentium 4-M...there are no P-M's at 3.06GHz.

Greg


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Ruset
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 9:29 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] Pentium-M desktop motherboard

Anybody know of a desktop motherboard that will accept a Pentium-M
processor? I yanked a 3.06ghz Pentium-M from a dead Dell and would like
to use it in some sort of desktop system.






Re: [H] Pentium-M desktop motherboard

2007-01-07 Thread lopaka
One of my servers is a 2 gig pentium-M using the AOpen i915GMm-HFS. Rock 
solid and stable with pretty good TV-output too.


lopaka
Anybody know of a desktop motherboard that will accept a Pentium-M 
processor? I yanked a 3.06ghz Pentium-M from a dead Dell and would 
like to use it in some sort of desktop system.