[H] Test Test

2007-02-18 Thread CW
Jim-

If we're having serious problems (this has gone on for weeks now) I can move 
the list temporarily until we get it sorted out.  


[H] PC Picture Links

2007-02-18 Thread CW
Whew!  Ok, I'll contact everyone who emailed me, if they've been bumped from 
the list (JRS, Veech, etc.) then we'll need to re-ad them.

Sending through another, just some pictures of a system build...

http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/928.jpg
http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/929.jpg
http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/934.jpg

Not totally done, but one I thought was nice.. two already OC'd 8800GTX/SLI 
QX6700/Tuniq/1kW PSU.. pretty.  Still need to put three more burners in it and 
a media reader, but it's coming along nice ;)

(figured I'd throw out more then just a test test)


Re: [H] PC Picture Links

2007-02-18 Thread Jeff Lane
How did everyone get knocked off, Chris? I think I am getting everything 
that has been sent, although not very much.


BTW that new PC is really impressive.wow... what a CPU cooler!

Jeff



Whew!  Ok, I'll contact everyone who emailed me, if they've been bumped 
from the list (JRS, Veech, etc.) then we'll need to re-ad them.


Sending through another, just some pictures of a system build...

http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/928.jpg
http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/929.jpg
http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/934.jpg

Not totally done, but one I thought was nice.. two already OC'd 
8800GTX/SLI QX6700/Tuniq/1kW PSU.. pretty.  Still need to put three more 
burners in it and a media reader, but it's coming along nice ;)


(figured I'd throw out more then just a test test)





Re: [H] PC Picture Links

2007-02-18 Thread CW
Not sure ;)  I'll message Jim, I think he's running the server at a colo or 
somewhere.  I spoke to him a while back and I think he was telling me it was 
several revisions back on Linux.

Yeah, I really like those kind of builds; I've got about four of them going at 
the moment.  Everyone keeps talking to me about Watercooling, and we've done 
some of that, but man.. talk about a hastle.  The tuniq may be the best thing 
I've seen for cooling.. it does a better job then most of the water cooling 
systems we've tried (Thermaltake Tribe / Zalman 1 / 2 / Gigabyte) and outside 
of a custom danger den kit, it's the best solution I've seen.  

And it's a hell of a lot less hassle and risk.  And so quiet.  

I should take some pictures of the AMD 4X4 box we've got up.. FX72*2 on a 
board.  That's a strange solution.. here's one thing to be said about it:  XP 
Performance on it SUCKS but Vista-64 performance with enough memory is pretty 
impressive.  The board is still too big, but as a server board, it's about 
everything you could ask for.

CW

-Original message-
From: "Jeff Lane" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:08:27 -0600
To: "The Hardware List" hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] PC Picture Links

> How did everyone get knocked off, Chris? I think I am getting everything 
> that has been sent, although not very much.
> 
> BTW that new PC is really impressive.wow... what a CPU cooler!
> 
> Jeff
> 
> 
> 
> > Whew!  Ok, I'll contact everyone who emailed me, if they've been bumped 
> > from the list (JRS, Veech, etc.) then we'll need to re-ad them.
> >
> > Sending through another, just some pictures of a system build...
> >
> > http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/928.jpg
> > http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/929.jpg
> > http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/934.jpg
> >
> > Not totally done, but one I thought was nice.. two already OC'd 
> > 8800GTX/SLI QX6700/Tuniq/1kW PSU.. pretty.  Still need to put three more 
> > burners in it and a media reader, but it's coming along nice ;)
> >
> > (figured I'd throw out more then just a test test)
> > 
> 
> 


Re: [H] PC Picture Links

2007-02-18 Thread Jeff Lane

I'll have to look at that next time I build a box.

We're the only one I have received today from the list and only the "bottom 
line" thread last couple of days.



Subject: Re: [H] PC Picture Links


Not sure ;)  I'll message Jim, I think he's running the server at a colo 
or somewhere.  I spoke to him a while back and I think he was telling me 
it was several revisions back on Linux.


Yeah, I really like those kind of builds; I've got about four of them 
going at the moment.  Everyone keeps talking to me about Watercooling, and 
we've done some of that, but man.. talk about a hastle.  The tuniq may be 
the best thing I've seen for cooling.. it does a better job then most of 
the water cooling systems we've tried (Thermaltake Tribe / Zalman 1 / 2 / 
Gigabyte) and outside of a custom danger den kit, it's the best solution 
I've seen.


And it's a hell of a lot less hassle and risk.  And so quiet.

I should take some pictures of the AMD 4X4 box we've got up.. FX72*2 on a 
board.  That's a strange solution.. here's one thing to be said about it: 
XP Performance on it SUCKS but Vista-64 performance with enough memory is 
pretty impressive.  The board is still too big, but as a server board, 
it's about everything you could ask for.


CW

-Original message-
>

How did everyone get knocked off, Chris? I think I am getting everything
that has been sent, although not very much.

BTW that new PC is really impressive.wow... what a CPU cooler!

Jeff



> Whew!  Ok, I'll contact everyone who emailed me, if they've been bumped
> from the list (JRS, Veech, etc.) then we'll need to re-ad them.
>
> Sending through another, just some pictures of a system build...
>
> http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/928.jpg
> http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/929.jpg
> http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/934.jpg
>
> Not totally done, but one I thought was nice.. two already OC'd
> 8800GTX/SLI QX6700/Tuniq/1kW PSU.. pretty.  Still need to put three 
> more

> burners in it and a media reader, but it's coming along nice ;)
>
> (figured I'd throw out more then just a test test)
>








[H] CW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

2007-02-18 Thread Al


Hi Chris 


> http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/928.jpg
> http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/929.jpg
> http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/934.jpg

Very nice. Quite a nice setup, indeed.

So, while looking over the website, and coming across the rates page:
http://www.kctechheads.com/rates.html
I noticed a couple of minor anomalies. The Business Clients paragraph
sounds a little odd. May I suggest it say $$$ per hour  or $$$ hourly,
but not both:  $$$ per hourly. 

And the sentence:
After hours normal hours (9AM-7PM) billing rate ...
is a little odd sounding too.

I have learned so much from the list, and especially you over the years;
I wanted to try to give back.

Best wishes for you and yours,

al



RE: [H] PC Picture Links

2007-02-18 Thread James Maki
> -Original Message-
> From: CW

> Whew!  Ok, I'll contact everyone who emailed me, if they've 
> been bumped from the list (JRS, Veech, etc.) then we'll need 
> to re-ad them.
> 
> Sending through another, just some pictures of a system build...
> 
> http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/928.jpg
> http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/929.jpg
> http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/934.jpg
> 
> Not totally done, but one I thought was nice.. two already 
> OC'd 8800GTX/SLI QX6700/Tuniq/1kW PSU.. pretty.  Still need 
> to put three more burners in it and a media reader, but it's 
> coming along nice ;)
> 
> (figured I'd throw out more then just a test test)

I have been having trouble posting to the list recently. Is the system build
in a Thermaltake Armor Series VA8000BWS case? Looks VERY roomy. If this is
the Thermaltake, what do you think about the case? If not, what brand/model
is the case?

Thanks,

Jim Maki
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [H] PC Picture Links

2007-02-18 Thread tmservo
Yeah its an armor. We've been doing most lately in them. It is roomy and easy 
to work with. I like the psu mount a lot

We just sent out one in a silverstone tj09. Great case. But even for all the 
pros going for it I still think the armor is the most functional

CW

Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless  

-Original Message-
From: "James Maki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:01:38 
To:"'The Hardware List'" 
Subject: RE: [H] PC Picture Links

> -Original Message-
> From: CW

> Whew!  Ok, I'll contact everyone who emailed me, if they've 
> been bumped from the list (JRS, Veech, etc.) then we'll need 
> to re-ad them.
> 
> Sending through another, just some pictures of a system build...
> 
> http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/928.jpg
> http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/929.jpg
> http://www.kctechheads.com/pcbuild/934.jpg
> 
> Not totally done, but one I thought was nice.. two already 
> OC'd 8800GTX/SLI QX6700/Tuniq/1kW PSU.. pretty.  Still need 
> to put three more burners in it and a media reader, but it's 
> coming along nice ;)
> 
> (figured I'd throw out more then just a test test)

I have been having trouble posting to the list recently. Is the system build
in a Thermaltake Armor Series VA8000BWS case? Looks VERY roomy. If this is
the Thermaltake, what do you think about the case? If not, what brand/model
is the case?

Thanks,

Jim Maki
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [H] Test Test

2007-02-18 Thread Julian Zottl
What's going on with the list?  I haven't had any troubles.
Jim: If you're having troubles, let me know what I can do :)
Take care,
Julian-Original Message-From: "CW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 2/18/2007 6:28:58 PMTo: hardware@hardwaregroup.comSubject: [H] Test TestJim-If we're having serious problems (this has gone on for weeks now) I can move the list temporarily until we get it sorted out. 

Re: [H] CW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

2007-02-18 Thread Joe User
Hello Al,

Sunday, February 18, 2007, 10:43:15 PM, you wrote:

> So, while looking over the website, and coming across the rates page:
> http://www.kctechheads.com/rates.html
> I noticed a couple of minor anomalies. The Business Clients paragraph
> sounds a little odd. May I suggest it say $$$ per hour  or $$$ hourly,
> but not both:  $$$ per hourly. 

> And the sentence:
> After hours normal hours (9AM-7PM) billing rate ...
> is a little odd sounding too.

> I have learned so much from the list, and especially you over the years;
> I wanted to try to give back.

Since May of 2002, the client base for KCTechHeads has risen exponentially - as 
more people discover the benefits of IT staff "on-call" without the hastle.

hastle should be hassle.  http://www.kctechheads.com/cohistory.html




-- 
Regards,
 joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...