Re: jchevm status?
Weldon, I have added patch update to the same JIRA. Recent version of jchevm and classlib is changed, so old version of the adapter no longer works. Archie, current version of jchevm has hard coded optimizations in configure.ac, it is difficult to debug the code with optimizations. When disabling optimizations in it (-O0) - there are compilation and execution problems. I have small fix for compilation problems and small dirty fix for execution. Interested? -- Ivan 2006/5/27, Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 5/22/06, Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Weldon Washburn wrote: > > Please hold off the check-in for a few days. I would like to try > > Ivan's mods on my machine to make certain they are complete. The > > intention is to reduce the chance of secondary patch-up check-ins and > > the related blizzard of emails. > > No problem.. I'll wait for both (a) your confirmation and (b) Sorry for the delay. I am looking at Ivan's mods now and hope to have results by the end of this weekend. Its been delayed by the MMTK project I am starting up. > Apache contributor license thingie. > > -Archie > > __ > Archie Cobbs *CTO, Awarix* http://www.awarix.com > > - > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Weldon Washburn Intel Middleware Products Division - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ivan Intel Middleware Products Division - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DRLVM] proposal to port MMTK to drlvm
I think starting with the jikesRVM code is very good idea. This is because we can see how the JVM currently interfaces with the MMTk package. I would say to download that source. On 5/27/06, Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Good point. Which MMTK code base should we work with? Where is it located? I know one version of MMTK is bundled with the Jikes source code. I do not know if it is the best version to start this project. There is a Jikes download link on the page: http://jikesrvm.sourceforge.net/download/index.shtml. The version on this page is jikesrvm-2.4.4.tar.gz. Does anybody know of a better version to start with? On 5/25/06, bootjvm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Weldon, > > Where can I find the MMTK source? I've not been > able to locate it where I thought it was supposed to > be on SourceForge. > > Thanks, > > > Dan Lydick > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: > > Date: 5/24/06 1:09:03 AM > > Subject: [DRLVM] proposal to port MMTK to drlvm > > > > Folks, > > > > There were several interesting email chains about Harmony VM and MMTK > > last year. This topic died in large part because there was no JVM. > > Since then, several JVMs have been donated. I volunteer to do an > > initial investigation of porting MMTK to the recent DRLVM donation. > > From a quick grep of the code, it appears that write barriers are only > > partially implemented. We will need to make write barriers functional > > before many of the features of MMTK can be used. Thoughts? > > > > Weldon > > > > > > > > -- > > Weldon Washburn > > Intel Middleware Products Division > > > > - > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- Weldon Washburn Intel Middleware Products Division - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Daniel Feinberg http://www.cs.unm.edu/~danielf - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: jchevm status?
On 5/22/06, Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Weldon Washburn wrote: > Please hold off the check-in for a few days. I would like to try > Ivan's mods on my machine to make certain they are complete. The > intention is to reduce the chance of secondary patch-up check-ins and > the related blizzard of emails. No problem.. I'll wait for both (a) your confirmation and (b) Sorry for the delay. I am looking at Ivan's mods now and hope to have results by the end of this weekend. Its been delayed by the MMTK project I am starting up. Apache contributor license thingie. -Archie __ Archie Cobbs *CTO, Awarix* http://www.awarix.com - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Weldon Washburn Intel Middleware Products Division - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DRLVM] proposal to port MMTK to drlvm
Good point. Which MMTK code base should we work with? Where is it located? I know one version of MMTK is bundled with the Jikes source code. I do not know if it is the best version to start this project. There is a Jikes download link on the page: http://jikesrvm.sourceforge.net/download/index.shtml. The version on this page is jikesrvm-2.4.4.tar.gz. Does anybody know of a better version to start with? On 5/25/06, bootjvm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Weldon, Where can I find the MMTK source? I've not been able to locate it where I thought it was supposed to be on SourceForge. Thanks, Dan Lydick > [Original Message] > From: Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Date: 5/24/06 1:09:03 AM > Subject: [DRLVM] proposal to port MMTK to drlvm > > Folks, > > There were several interesting email chains about Harmony VM and MMTK > last year. This topic died in large part because there was no JVM. > Since then, several JVMs have been donated. I volunteer to do an > initial investigation of porting MMTK to the recent DRLVM donation. > From a quick grep of the code, it appears that write barriers are only > partially implemented. We will need to make write barriers functional > before many of the features of MMTK can be used. Thoughts? > > Weldon > > > > -- > Weldon Washburn > Intel Middleware Products Division > > - > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Weldon Washburn Intel Middleware Products Division - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
