Re: [classlib] Uncertain behavior of new Socket(0.0.0.0, 1099);
Hello Geir,
I created new JIRA:
HARMONY-946
on this issue.
=
Warm Regards,
Victor Martynov,
Intel Middleware Product Division
On 7/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a bug. 0.0.0.0 should be all adapters, and is legit.
Can you file a JIRA?
Victor A Martynov wrote:
Hello Mikhail,
Here are the results of running the modified test:
---
import java.net.*;
public class Test {
public static void main(String args[]) throws Throwable {
ServerSocket ss = new ServerSocket(1099, 0,
InetAddress.getByName(0.0.0.0));
System.out.println(ss.getInetAddress());
Socket s = new Socket(0.0.0.0, 1099);
}
}
---
c:\testjava Test
/0.0.0.0
c:\testC:/Harmony/bin/ij -version
Apache Harmony DRLVM HEAD-4807 (2006-05-02), Windows/ia32/msvc 1310,
debug
c:\testC:/Harmony/bin/ij Test
/0.0.0.0
java.net.ConnectException: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:1099 - The address is not
available
at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
PlainSocketImpl.java:238)
at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
PlainSocketImpl.java:200)
at java.net.Socket.startupSocket(Socket.java:715)
at java.net.Socket.init(Socket.java:139)
at Test.main(Test.java:10)
=
Warm Regards,
Victor Martynov,
Intel Middleware Product Division
On 7/20/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add this line to the test to clarify the situation:
System.out.println(ss.getInetAddress());
I think that for PC with multiple network adapters serversocket IP
must be
specified manually.
On 7/20/06, Victor A Martynov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble with an application. This problem concerns
creating
java.net.Socket on host 0.0.0.0.
The test below illustrates this problem:
import java.net.*;
public class Test {
public static void main(String args[]) throws Throwable {
ServerSocket ss = new ServerSocket(1099);
Socket s = new Socket(0.0.0.0, 1099);
}
}
The output on RI and on Harmony differs:
c:\testjava Test
c:\testC:/Harmony/bin/ij Test
java.net.ConnectException: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:1099 - The address is not
available
at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
PlainSocketImpl.java:238)
at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
PlainSocketImpl.java:200)
at java.net.Socket.startupSocket(Socket.java:715)
at java.net.Socket.init(Socket.java:139)
at Test.main(Test.java:7)
I wonder whether it is a bug in RI or a bug in LUNI of Harmony?
=
Warm Regards,
Victor Martynov,
Intel Middleware Product Division
--
Mikhail Fursov
-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[classlib] Uncertain behavior of new Socket(0.0.0.0, 1099);
Hello,
I'm having trouble with an application. This problem concerns creating
java.net.Socket on host 0.0.0.0.
The test below illustrates this problem:
import java.net.*;
public class Test {
public static void main(String args[]) throws Throwable {
ServerSocket ss = new ServerSocket(1099);
Socket s = new Socket(0.0.0.0, 1099);
}
}
The output on RI and on Harmony differs:
c:\testjava Test
c:\testC:/Harmony/bin/ij Test
java.net.ConnectException: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:1099 - The address is not
available
at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
PlainSocketImpl.java:238)
at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
PlainSocketImpl.java:200)
at java.net.Socket.startupSocket(Socket.java:715)
at java.net.Socket.init(Socket.java:139)
at Test.main(Test.java:7)
I wonder whether it is a bug in RI or a bug in LUNI of Harmony?
=
Warm Regards,
Victor Martynov,
Intel Middleware Product Division
Re: [classlib] Uncertain behavior of new Socket(0.0.0.0, 1099);
Hello Mark,
I run the example on MS Windows XP, Harmony classlib+DRLVM dated 11 july
2006.
c:\testc:\Harmony\bin\ij -version
Apache Harmony DRLVM HEAD-4807 (2006-05-02), Windows/ia32/msvc 1310, debug
=
Warm Regards,
Victor Martynov,
Intel Middleware Product Division
On 7/20/06, Mark Hindess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 July 2006 at 15:34, Victor A Martynov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble with an application. This problem concerns creating
java.net.Socket on host 0.0.0.0.
What platform? Works for me on Linux (debian testing).
-Mark.
The test below illustrates this problem:
import java.net.*;
public class Test {
public static void main(String args[]) throws Throwable {
ServerSocket ss = new ServerSocket(1099);
Socket s = new Socket(0.0.0.0, 1099);
}
}
The output on RI and on Harmony differs:
c:\testjava Test
c:\testC:/Harmony/bin/ij Test
java.net.ConnectException: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:1099 - The address is not
available
at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
PlainSocketImpl.java:238)
at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
PlainSocketImpl.java:200)
at java.net.Socket.startupSocket(Socket.java:715)
at java.net.Socket.init(Socket.java:139)
at Test.main(Test.java:7)
I wonder whether it is a bug in RI or a bug in LUNI of Harmony?
=
Warm Regards,
Victor Martynov,
Intel Middleware Product Division
--=_Part_57416_17500570.1153395298489--
-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [classlib] Uncertain behavior of new Socket(0.0.0.0, 1099);
Hello Mikhail,
Here are the results of running the modified test:
---
import java.net.*;
public class Test {
public static void main(String args[]) throws Throwable {
ServerSocket ss = new ServerSocket(1099, 0,
InetAddress.getByName(0.0.0.0));
System.out.println(ss.getInetAddress());
Socket s = new Socket(0.0.0.0, 1099);
}
}
---
c:\testjava Test
/0.0.0.0
c:\testC:/Harmony/bin/ij -version
Apache Harmony DRLVM HEAD-4807 (2006-05-02), Windows/ia32/msvc 1310, debug
c:\testC:/Harmony/bin/ij Test
/0.0.0.0
java.net.ConnectException: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:1099 - The address is not
available
at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
PlainSocketImpl.java:238)
at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
PlainSocketImpl.java:200)
at java.net.Socket.startupSocket(Socket.java:715)
at java.net.Socket.init(Socket.java:139)
at Test.main(Test.java:10)
=
Warm Regards,
Victor Martynov,
Intel Middleware Product Division
On 7/20/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add this line to the test to clarify the situation:
System.out.println(ss.getInetAddress());
I think that for PC with multiple network adapters serversocket IP must be
specified manually.
On 7/20/06, Victor A Martynov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble with an application. This problem concerns creating
java.net.Socket on host 0.0.0.0.
The test below illustrates this problem:
import java.net.*;
public class Test {
public static void main(String args[]) throws Throwable {
ServerSocket ss = new ServerSocket(1099);
Socket s = new Socket(0.0.0.0, 1099);
}
}
The output on RI and on Harmony differs:
c:\testjava Test
c:\testC:/Harmony/bin/ij Test
java.net.ConnectException: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:1099 - The address is not
available
at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
PlainSocketImpl.java:238)
at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
PlainSocketImpl.java:200)
at java.net.Socket.startupSocket(Socket.java:715)
at java.net.Socket.init(Socket.java:139)
at Test.main(Test.java:7)
I wonder whether it is a bug in RI or a bug in LUNI of Harmony?
=
Warm Regards,
Victor Martynov,
Intel Middleware Product Division
--
Mikhail Fursov
Re: [classlib] Uncertain behavior of new Socket(0.0.0.0, 1099);
Hello Mark,
I checked the behavior of the test on Linux. It seems that the problem
exists on MS Windows only:
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ uname -a
Linux server 2.6.5-7.145lxset1-smp #1 SMP Thu Jan 27 09:19:29 UTC 2005 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ Harmony/bin/ij -version
Apache Harmony DRLVM HEAD-4807 (2006-05-02), Linux/ia32/gcc 3.3.4, debug
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ Harmony/bin/ij Test
/0.0.0.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ java Test
/0.0.0.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
--
The fact that Windows and Linux version behavior is different makes me think
that it is a bug in LUNI rather than the bug in RI.
=
Warm Regards,
Victor Martynov,
Intel Middleware Product Division
On 7/20/06, Mark Hindess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 July 2006 at 15:34, Victor A Martynov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble with an application. This problem concerns creating
java.net.Socket on host 0.0.0.0.
What platform? Works for me on Linux (debian testing).
-Mark.
The test below illustrates this problem:
import java.net.*;
public class Test {
public static void main(String args[]) throws Throwable {
ServerSocket ss = new ServerSocket(1099);
Socket s = new Socket(0.0.0.0, 1099);
}
}
The output on RI and on Harmony differs:
c:\testjava Test
c:\testC:/Harmony/bin/ij Test
java.net.ConnectException: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:1099 - The address is not
available
at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
PlainSocketImpl.java:238)
at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
PlainSocketImpl.java:200)
at java.net.Socket.startupSocket(Socket.java:715)
at java.net.Socket.init(Socket.java:139)
at Test.main(Test.java:7)
I wonder whether it is a bug in RI or a bug in LUNI of Harmony?
=
Warm Regards,
Victor Martynov,
Intel Middleware Product Division
--=_Part_57416_17500570.1153395298489--
-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
