[app-bug] mx4j
Hello, Now some people in this list are trying to make ActiveMQ run on Harmony. ActiveMQ is based on MX4J [1] . MX4J 3.0.1 has 812 unit tests. Results of those tests: BEA WebLogic JRockit(TM) 1.4.2_04 JVM : 810 tests, 1 failure, 1 error (99.75%) Harmony DRLVM version 11.2.0 766 tests, 2 failures, 110 errors (85.38%) Maybe it's worth to consider MX4j JUnit tests first and then try to fix ActiveMQ? MX4J is used not only in ActiveMQ but in other apps like Tomcat as well. [1] http://mx4j.sourceforge.net -- Regards, Anton Luht, Intel Middleware Products Division - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [app-bug] mx4j
that's a great idea. Have you isolated any of the errors? geir On Aug 17, 2006, at 10:40 AM, Anton Luht wrote: Hello, Now some people in this list are trying to make ActiveMQ run on Harmony. ActiveMQ is based on MX4J [1] . MX4J 3.0.1 has 812 unit tests. Results of those tests: BEA WebLogic JRockit(TM) 1.4.2_04 JVM : 810 tests, 1 failure, 1 error (99.75%) Harmony DRLVM version 11.2.0 766 tests, 2 failures, 110 errors (85.38%) Maybe it's worth to consider MX4j JUnit tests first and then try to fix ActiveMQ? MX4J is used not only in ActiveMQ but in other apps like Tomcat as well. [1] http://mx4j.sourceforge.net -- Regards, Anton Luht, Intel Middleware Products Division - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [app-bug] mx4j
Not yet. I think that making minimal test cases from JUnit tests is simpler than making ones from an application though. I'm going to get down to it soon - I just wanted to discuss it before acting to make sure that nobody objects such approach. On 8/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that's a great idea. Have you isolated any of the errors? geir On Aug 17, 2006, at 10:40 AM, Anton Luht wrote: Hello, Now some people in this list are trying to make ActiveMQ run on Harmony. ActiveMQ is based on MX4J [1] . MX4J 3.0.1 has 812 unit tests. Results of those tests: BEA WebLogic JRockit(TM) 1.4.2_04 JVM : 810 tests, 1 failure, 1 error (99.75%) Harmony DRLVM version 11.2.0 766 tests, 2 failures, 110 errors (85.38%) Maybe it's worth to consider MX4j JUnit tests first and then try to fix ActiveMQ? MX4J is used not only in ActiveMQ but in other apps like Tomcat as well. [1] http://mx4j.sourceforge.net -- Regards, Anton Luht, Intel Middleware Products Division - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [app-bug] mx4j
On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Anton Luht wrote: Not yet. I think that making minimal test cases from JUnit tests is simpler than making ones from an application though. I'm going to get down to it soon - I just wanted to discuss it before acting to make sure that nobody objects such approach. Oh - when I've tallked about app oriented testing, I didn't mean we have to slap the app into a test framework, but rather that we go out and find 'real-world' software (which I lazily labeled applications) to help flush out bugs. So, yes, this is really great if you've used the mx4j test suite to find Harmony bugs, and if you turn them into tests for us. Go! geir On 8/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that's a great idea. Have you isolated any of the errors? geir On Aug 17, 2006, at 10:40 AM, Anton Luht wrote: Hello, Now some people in this list are trying to make ActiveMQ run on Harmony. ActiveMQ is based on MX4J [1] . MX4J 3.0.1 has 812 unit tests. Results of those tests: BEA WebLogic JRockit(TM) 1.4.2_04 JVM : 810 tests, 1 failure, 1 error (99.75%) Harmony DRLVM version 11.2.0 766 tests, 2 failures, 110 errors (85.38%) Maybe it's worth to consider MX4j JUnit tests first and then try to fix ActiveMQ? MX4J is used not only in ActiveMQ but in other apps like Tomcat as well. [1] http://mx4j.sourceforge.net -- Regards, Anton Luht, Intel Middleware Products Division - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [app-bug] mx4j
2006/8/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Anton Luht wrote: Not yet. I think that making minimal test cases from JUnit tests is simpler than making ones from an application though. I'm going to get down to it soon - I just wanted to discuss it before acting to make sure that nobody objects such approach. Oh - when I've tallked about app oriented testing, I didn't mean we have to slap the app into a test framework, But if the application fails in some way we need to minimize test case somehow... I think that Anton is talking about this situation. but rather that we go out and find 'real-world' software (which I lazily labeled applications) to help flush out bugs. So, yes, this is really great if you've used the mx4j test suite to find Harmony bugs, and if you turn them into tests for us. Go! geir On 8/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that's a great idea. Have you isolated any of the errors? geir On Aug 17, 2006, at 10:40 AM, Anton Luht wrote: Hello, Now some people in this list are trying to make ActiveMQ run on Harmony. ActiveMQ is based on MX4J [1] . MX4J 3.0.1 has 812 unit tests. Results of those tests: BEA WebLogic JRockit(TM) 1.4.2_04 JVM : 810 tests, 1 failure, 1 error (99.75%) Harmony DRLVM version 11.2.0 766 tests, 2 failures, 110 errors (85.38%) Maybe it's worth to consider MX4j JUnit tests first and then try to fix ActiveMQ? MX4J is used not only in ActiveMQ but in other apps like Tomcat as well. [1] http://mx4j.sourceforge.net -- Regards, Anton Luht, Intel Middleware Products Division - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Alexey A. Petrenko Intel Middleware Products Division - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [app-bug] mx4j
Alexey Petrenko wrote: 2006/8/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Anton Luht wrote: Not yet. I think that making minimal test cases from JUnit tests is simpler than making ones from an application though. I'm going to get down to it soon - I just wanted to discuss it before acting to make sure that nobody objects such approach. Oh - when I've tallked about app oriented testing, I didn't mean we have to slap the app into a test framework, But if the application fails in some way we need to minimize test case somehow... I think that Anton is talking about this situation. And I'm trying to agree! :) but rather that we go out and find 'real-world' software (which I lazily labeled applications) to help flush out bugs. So, yes, this is really great if you've used the mx4j test suite to find Harmony bugs, and if you turn them into tests for us. Go! geir On 8/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that's a great idea. Have you isolated any of the errors? geir On Aug 17, 2006, at 10:40 AM, Anton Luht wrote: Hello, Now some people in this list are trying to make ActiveMQ run on Harmony. ActiveMQ is based on MX4J [1] . MX4J 3.0.1 has 812 unit tests. Results of those tests: BEA WebLogic JRockit(TM) 1.4.2_04 JVM : 810 tests, 1 failure, 1 error (99.75%) Harmony DRLVM version 11.2.0 766 tests, 2 failures, 110 errors (85.38%) Maybe it's worth to consider MX4j JUnit tests first and then try to fix ActiveMQ? MX4J is used not only in ActiveMQ but in other apps like Tomcat as well. [1] http://mx4j.sourceforge.net -- Regards, Anton Luht, Intel Middleware Products Division - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
