Re: ANNOUNCE: Haddock version 0.6
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:07:58 - "Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, they're binary incompatible I'm afraid. Oh, well... :) > The path is the path to the HTML files, and the filename is the name of > the .haddock file. They can be completely different, e.g. Of course. Silly me. Thanks, Juanma ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
Re: ANNOUNCE: Haddock version 0.6
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:01:00 -, "Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a new release of Haddock, version 0.6. Are interface files binary-incompatible with those of previous releases? With a Cygwin-compiled 0.6, I get an error: Fail: end of file Action: Data.Binary.getWord8 while trying to --read-interface a GHC 6.01 .haddock file (for example, ghc/doc/html/haskell98/haskell98.haddock). OTOH, haddock --html --dump-interface=doc\M1.haddock M1.hs haddock --html --read-interface=doc\,doc\M1.haddock M2.hs seems to work. And BTW, why it is necessary to write --read-interface=path,full-filename, i.e., why --read-interface=c:\ghc\doc\html\haskell98,c:\ghc\doc\html\haskell98.haddock instead of --read-interface=c:\ghc\doc\html\haskell98,haskell98.haddock ? Thanks, /L/e/k/t/u ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
Re: time since the epoch
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 19:55:47 +0100 Stefan Karrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've inserted 'convert = (uncurry cFromTai) . cToTai'. Great, thanks. > A fixed and checked version is appended and carbon copied to > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. What's haskell-libs-developers? I thought libraries' development was carried over on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (And shouldn't we be discussing Tai.lhs there, BTW :) I'm attaching a patch (diff -u2) with a few small changes: - 1%seconds_per_day -> 1 % seconds_per_day (otherwise GHC complains in -fglasgow-exts mode because it misinterprets it as an implicit parameter). - I've put a few _ here and there to silence warnings for unused arguments. - I've renamed a few variables because of "shadows an existing binding" warnings. - I've deleted a few internal definitions apparently not used (according to -Wall), like cumulated_month_length_after_february. - I've corrected a few typos. More coments: - I'm sending you the patch throw the Haskell list because previous attempts of sending to your e-mail address failed. - Are you very fond of the literate style? I ask because unlit'ing it would allow adding Haddock coments, which would be nice. - I'm not sure I like depending on a leapseconds table hardcoded in the source, even if it changes slowly. Wouldn't it be better to have the data in a file and load it through unsafePerformIO? (And isn't loading configuration data one of the few "good" examples of use of unsafePerformIO, after all? :) - I get a warning with -Wall: Warning: Defined but not used: TimeDiff, days_from_MJD2unixEpoch, days_from_unixEpoch2MJD', hours_per_day, isodelta, isomoveDHM, isomoveS, isomoveYM, libtaiEpoch, month_per_year, test, test2 Several of these are neither used nor exported. ??? Thanks, Juanma Tai.lhs.diff.bz2 Description: Binary data ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
Re: time since the epoch
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 17:36:11 +0100 Stefan Karrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > a while ago time calculation was subject on this list. > Now, I have a time library based on the TAI (international > atomic time) time scale. I get the following error with GHCi: Compiling Main ( Tai.lhs, interpreted ) Tai.lhs:450: Couldn't match `LeapSeconds' against `TAI' Expected type: LeapSeconds Inferred type: TAI In the first argument of `cFromTai', namely `taileap1' In the first argument of `cSecond', namely `(cFromTai taileap1 lst)' Tai.lhs:453: Couldn't match `LeapSeconds' against `TAI' Expected type: LeapSeconds Inferred type: TAI In the first argument of `cFromTai', namely `taileap2' In the first argument of `cSecond', namely `(cFromTai taileap2 lst)' Tai.lhs:472: Couldn't match `LeapSeconds' against `TAI' Expected type: LeapSeconds Inferred type: TAI In the first argument of `cFromTai', namely `taileap1' In the first argument of `cSecond', namely `(cFromTai taileap1 lst)' Tai.lhs:475: Couldn't match `LeapSeconds' against `TAI' Expected type: LeapSeconds Inferred type: TAI In the first argument of `cFromTai', namely `taileap2' In the first argument of `cSecond', namely `(cFromTai taileap2 lst)' Failed, modules loaded: none. Also, wouldn't make sense to add: cConvert :: (Calendar a, Calendar b) => a -> b cConvert = cFromTai . cToTai Or it is already there and I've missed it? Juanma ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
