[Haskell-cafe] Nofib documentation

[Monique Louise]

Hi all.

 does anyone know where can I find a better documentation
for Nofib benchmark? Is there any reference which contains the
standard and slow inputs? In the CVS tree I just found the
standard/slow/fast outputs.

Thanks in advance,-- Monique Louise B.MonteiroMsc Student in Computer ScienceCenter of InformaticsFederal University of Pernambuco
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

[Haskell-cafe] O'Haskell

[Monique Louise]

Is there any project for extending GHC or any other Haskell compiler
with support to O'Haskell / any object-oriented Haskell extesion? That
could be very useful for improving Haskell interoperability with OO
languages.

Thanks in advance,

Monique Monteiro
-- 

Monique Louise B.Monteiro
Msc Student in Computer Science
Center of Informatics
Federal University of Pernambuco
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

[Haskell-cafe] How to debug GHC

[Monique Louise]

Hi, all,

  I'm developing a back end for GHC and I have the following problem:
my program is throwing an empty list exception due to head [] and I
need to compile GHC with -prof -auto-all in order to see the stack
trace when running it with +RTS -xc -RTS.  I changed the makefile but
the option +RTS -xc -RTS was not recognized as an available RTS option

 Does anyone have any idea about how I can do that ?

Thanks in advance,

-- 

Monique Louise B.Monteiro
Msc Student in Computer Science
Center of Informatics
Federal University of Pernambuco
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Re: [Haskell-cafe] How to debug GHC

[Monique Louise]

Thanks, Ketil, your suggestion really helped me ! Thanks to Claus for the tips !

On 4/26/05, Ketil Malde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Claus Reinke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  no direct answer to your question, but a general comment on the
  original problem (speaking from bad experience;-): things like
  head have no place in a Haskell program of any non-trivial size,
  because of their useless error messages.
 
 I must say I liked John Meacham's description of his magic
 underscore.  My solution to this problem is redefining the
 troublesome functions as cpp macros, e.g:
 
  #define BUG(C_,M_) (error (Program error - '++C_++' failed: ++M_++. 
 Location: '++__FILE__++' line ++show __LINE__))
  #define head (\xs - case xs of { (x:_) - x ; _ - BUG(head,empty 
 list)})
 
 Ideally, I think something like this should be the default behavior
 for these functions.
 
 -kzm
 
 PS: If anybody wants, I can mail my additional cpp definitions for 'head',
 'at' (array indexing, I couldn't work out how to redefine the bang),
 'read' and 'fromJust'.
 --
 If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
 
 


-- 

Monique Louise B.Monteiro
Msc Student in Computer Science
Center of Informatics
Federal University of Pernambuco
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

[Haskell-cafe] How to debug GHC

[Monique Louise de Barros Monteiro]

Hi, all,
 I'm developing a back end for GHC and I have the following problem:
my program is throwing an empty list exception due to head [] and I
need to compile GHC with -prof -auto-all in order to see the stack
trace when running it with +RTS -xc -RTS.  I changed the makefile but
the option +RTS -xc -RTS was not recognized as an available RTS option
Does anyone have any idea about how I can do that ?
Thanks in advance,

__
Monique Louise Monteiro
Mestranda em Ciencia da Computacao
Centro de Informatica - CIn - UFPE
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe