Hello,
See this message:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.general/13145/
Your (initial) program should work in GHC 6.2. I actually find this feature useful,
but Simon apparently changed this when moving to GHC 6.4 and nobody complained...
Apparently not many people use this feature.
Cheers,
Bruno
On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 18:31:03 +, C Rodrigues wrote:
>This counterintuitive typechecking result came up when I wrote a wrapper
>around runST. Is there some limitation of HM with respect to type checking
>pattern matching?
>
>data X a b = X (a -> a)
>run :: forall a. (forall b. X a b) -> a -> a
>-- This definition doesn't pass the typechecker
>run (X f) = f
>-- But this definition works
>run x = (\(X f) -> f) x
>
>
>___
>Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
>http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
